Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:15:26.460Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Knowledge, Power and System in Hegel and Foucault: The Hegelian Impact on Foucault’s Theories of Power

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2018

Giovanni Vallebona  and
Bernadette Weber
Giovanni Vallebona
Affiliation:
University of Genoa, [email protected], [email protected]
Bernadette Weber
Affiliation:
University of Genoa, [email protected], [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The following article will broach the issue of the relation between Hegel and Foucault based on the binomial knowledge-power. While for Hegel human knowledge comes with the development of consciousness, for Foucault the possibility of knowledge is articulated within a phenomenology of power. While for Hegel Bildung leads spirit to self-consciousness, Foucault initially considers formation to be connected to a forced correction. At first Foucault studies the problem of formation in view of the dynamics of power, as a faculty of repression; later he underlines that the exchange between the sovereign and the advisor positively influences the decisions of the latter, as well as their personal growth. Foucault points out the connection between truth and freedom, and emphasizes the fundamental role of parresia as a force to break the system of power relations.

Type
Articles
Information
Hegel Bulletin , Volume 39 , Special Issue 2: Hegel and Twentieth-Century French Philosophy , October 2018 , pp. 260 - 279
Copyright
© The Hegel Society of Great Britain 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Catucci, S. (2008), Introduzione a Foucault. Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, H. L. and Rabinow, P. (1989), La ricerca di Michel Foucault. Analitica della verità e storia del presente. Milan: Ponte Alle Grazie.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (2003), L’ermeneutica del soggetto. Corso al Collège de France 1981-82, trans. M. Bertani. Milan: Feltrinelli.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (2004), L’ordine del discorso, trans. A. Fontana, M. Bertani and V. Zini. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (2009a), Bisogna difendere la società, Corso al Collège de France 1975-76 , ed. M. Bertani and A. Fontana. Milan: Feltrinelli.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (2009b), Il Coraggio della verità. Il Governo di Sé e degli altri II, Corso al Collège de France 1984, ed. M. Galzignam. Milan: Feltrinelli.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (2014a), ‘Follia e discorso’, in J. Revel (ed.) and G. Costa (trans.), Archivio Foucault, Vol. I: interventi colloqui testimonianze, 1961-70 . Milan: Feltrinelli.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (2014b), Potere e strategie. Milano-Udine: Mimesis.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (2014c), Sorvegliare e Punire. Nascita della Prigione, trans. A. Tachetti. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (2015), Nascita della Biopolitica, Corso al Collège de France 1978–79, trans. M. Bertani and V. Zini. Milan: Feltrinelli.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (2016a), La società punitiva. Corso al Collège do France 1972–73, ed. D. Borca and P. A. Rovatti. Milan: Feltrinelli.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (2016b), Il coraggio della verità. Il governo di sé e degli altri II. Corso al Collège de France (1984). Milano: Feltrinelli.Google Scholar
Pöggeler, O. (2006), ‘Selbstbewusstsein als Leitfaden der Phänomenologie des Geistes’, in D. Köhler and O. Pöggeler (eds.), Phänomenologie des Geistes. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Schnädelbach, H. (2002), Hegel, trans. F. Ferraresi. Bologna: Mulino.Google Scholar
Ricken, F. (2013), Etica generale, ed. A. Campodonico. Milano: Vita Pensiero.Google Scholar