Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:59:05.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hegel’s Subjective Logic as a Logic for (Hegel’s) Philosophy of Mind

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2016

Paul Redding
Paul Redding*
Affiliation:
University of Sydney, [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

In the 1930s, C. I. Lewis, who was responsible for the revival of modal logic in the era of modern symbolic logic, characterized ‘intensional’ approaches to logic as typical of post-Leibnizian ‘continental philosophy’, in contrast to the ‘extensionalist’ approaches dominant in the British tradition. Indeed Lewis’s own work in this area had been inspired by the logic of his teacher, the American ‘Absolute Idealist’, Josiah Royce. Hegel’s ‘Subjective Logic’ in Book III of his Science of Logic, can, I suggest, be considered as an intensional modal logic, and this paper explores parallels between it and a later variety of modal logic—tense logic, as developed by Arthur Prior in the 1950s and 60s. Like Lewis, Prior too had been influenced in this area by a teacher with strong Hegelian leanings—John N. Findlay. Treated as an intensional (with an ‘s’) logic, Hegel’s subjective logic can be used as a framework for addressing issues of intentionality (with a ‘t’)—the mind’s capacity to be intentionally directed to objects. In this way, I suggest that the structures of his subjective logic can clarify what is at issue in the ‘Psychology’ section of the Encyclopaedia Philosophy of Subjective Spirit.

Type
Articles
Information
Hegel Bulletin , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , May 2018 , pp. 1 - 22
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Hegel Society of Great Britain 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, R. L. (2015), The Poverty of Conceptual Truth: Kant’s Analytic/Synthetic Distinction and the Limits of Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle (1984), ‘Posterior Analytics’, in J. Barnes (ed.), The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, vol. I. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Arnauld, A. and Nicole, P. (1996), Logic or the Art of Thinking: Containing, besides common rules, several new observations appropriate for forming judgment, trans. and ed. J. Vance Buroker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (first published 1662–1683).Google Scholar
Blackburn, P., di Rijke, M. and Venema, Y. (2001), Modal Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandom, R. (2014), ‘Some Hegelian Ideas of Note for Contemporary Analytic Philosophy’, Hegel Bulletin 35:1: 1–15.Google Scholar
Copeland, B. J. (2002), ‘The Genesis of Possible Worlds Semantics’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 3: 99–137.Google Scholar
Findlay, J. N. (1941), ‘Time: A Treatment of Some Puzzles’, Australasian Journal of Psychology and Philosophy 19:3: 216–235 (reprinted in Anthony Flew, Essays on Logic and Language. Oxford: Blackwell, 1951).Google Scholar
Findlay, J. N. (1955–6), ‘Some Merits of Hegelianism: The Presidential Address’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society New Series 56: 1–24.Google Scholar
Findlay, J. N. (1958), Hegel: A Re-examination. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Findlay, J. N. (1985), ‘My Life: 1903–1973’, in R. S. Cohen, R. M. Martin and M. Westphal (eds.), Studies in the Philosophy of J. N. Findlay. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Förster, E. (2012), The Twenty Five Years of Philosophy, trans. B. Bowman. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1968–), Gesammelte Werke. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Hintikka, J. (1962), Knowledge and Belief: An Introduction to the Logic of Two Notions. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Inwood, M. (2007), ‘Commentary’, in G. W. F. Hegel, Philosophy of Mind, trans W. Walace and A. V. Miller, revised with introudction and commentary by Michael Inwood. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. E. (1921), Logic: Part 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kneale, W. (1968), ‘Intentionality and Intensionality’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 42: 73–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kripke, S. (1963), ‘Semantical considerations on modal logic’, Acta Philosophica Fennica 16: 83–94.Google Scholar
Lenzen, W. (2004), ‘Leibniz’s Logic’, in D. M. Gabbay, J. Woods and A. Kanamori (eds.), Handbook of the History of Logic. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. I. (1918), A Survey of Symbolic Logic. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, C. I. (1930), ‘Logic and Pragmatism’, in G. P. Adams and W. P. Montague (eds.), Contemporary American Philosophy. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
McTaggart, J. M. E. (1908), ‘The Unreality of Time’, Mind 17: 457–474.Google Scholar
Prior, A. N. (1957), Time and Modality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Prior, A. N. (1967), Past, Present and Future. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Prior, A. N. (1968), ‘Intentionality and Intensionality’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 42: 91–106.Google Scholar
Prior, A. N. (2003), Papers on Time and Tense, ed. P. Hasle, P. Ohrstrom, T. Braüner and J. Copeland. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Prior, A. N. and Fine, K. (1977), Worlds, Times and Selves. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Ramsey, F. P. (1925), ‘Universals’, Mind 3:4: 401–417.Google Scholar
Redding, P. (1996), Hegel’s Hermeneutics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Redding, P. (2007), Analytic Philosophy and the Return of Hegelian Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Redding, P. (2016), ‘Subjective Logic and the Unity of Thought and Being: Hegel’s Logical Reconstruction of Aristotle’s Speculative Empiricism’, to appear in D. Edmunts and S. Sedgwick (eds.), Internationales Jahrbuch des Deutschen Idealismus vol. 12: Logic, forthcoming 2016.Google Scholar
Whitaker, C. W. A. (1996), Aristotle’s De Interpretatione: Contradiction and Dialectic. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1922), Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, trans. C. K. Ogden. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1958), The Blue and Brown Books. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Zalta, E. N. (1988), Intensional Logic and the Metaphysics of Intentionality. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar