Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T16:57:36.371Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hegel on Addiction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2019

Katerina Deligiorgi
Katerina Deligiorgi*
Affiliation:
University of Sussex, [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to show how certain distinctive elements of Hegel's theory of action can provide a fresh philosophical perspective on the phenomenon of addiction. What motivates the turn to Hegel is a set of puzzles that arise out of contemporary medical and philosophical discussions of addiction. Starting with questions concerning ongoing attempts to define addiction, the paper examines the resources needed for addiction to be classed as a disorder, as it commonly is. Provisionally settling with the notion of akrasia, the paper turns to Hegel for a theory of agency that fills in the gaps of the account of akrasia used in the contemporary literature on addiction and helps resolve the puzzles that occasioned the paper.

Type
Articles
Information
Hegel Bulletin , Volume 40 , Special Issue 3: Hegel and the Philosophy of Action , December 2019 , pp. 398 - 424
Copyright
Copyright © The Hegel Society of Great Britain, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ameisen, O. (2008), The End of My Addiction: How One Man Cured Himself of Alcoholism. New York: Farrar Straus Giroux.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association. (1994), Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV. Fourth Edition. Arlington: American Psychiatric Association Publishing.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association. (2013), Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5®). Fifth Edition. Arlington: American Psychiatric Association Publishing.Google Scholar
Amodeo, M. (2015), ‘The Addictive Personality’, Substance Use and Misuse 50:8–9:1013–16.10.3109/10826084.2015.1007646Google Scholar
Becker, G. S. (1992), ‘Habits, Addictions, and Traditions’, Kyklos 45: 327–345.10.1111/j.1467-6435.1992.tb02119.xGoogle Scholar
Charland, L. C. (2002), ‘Cynthia's Dilemma: Consenting to Heroin Prescription’, American Journal of Bioethics 2:2: 37–57.10.1162/152651602317533686Google Scholar
Charland, L. C. (2011), ‘Decision-Making Capacity and Responsibility in Addiction’, in Graham, G. and Poland, J. (eds.), Addiction and Responsibility. London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Corrado, M. L. (1999), ‘Addiction and Responsibility’, Law and Philosophy 18:6: 579–88.Google Scholar
Deligiorgi, K. (2017), ‘Hegel's Moral Philosophy’, in Moyar, D. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook to Hegel. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Deligiorgi, K. (2019a), ‘The Good and the Actual’, in Honneth, A. and Christ, J. (eds.), Zweite Natur. Stuttgarter Hegel-Kongress 2017. Veröffentlichungen der Internationalen Hegel-Vereinigung (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Deligiorgi, K. (2019b), ‘The Idea of the Good’, in Gerhard, M. (ed.), Hegel-Jahrbuch (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Di Nucci, E. (2014), ‘Addiction, Compulsion, and Agency’, Neuroethics 7: 105–7.10.1007/s12152-013-9184-xGoogle Scholar
Eddy, N. B., Halbach, H., Isbell, H. and Seevers, M. H. (1965), ‘Drug Dependence: Its Significance and Characteristics’, Bulletin of the World Health Organization 32: 721–33.Google Scholar
Elster, J. (1999a), Strong Feelings: Emotion, Addiction, and Human Behavior. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/6498.001.0001Google Scholar
Elster, J. (ed.). (1999b), Addiction: Entries and Exits. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Everitt, B. J. and Heberlein, U. (2013), ‘Addiction’, Current Opinion in Neurobiology 23:4: 463–6.10.1016/j.conb.2013.07.003Google Scholar
Foddy, B. (2011), ‘Addiction and its Sciences–Philosophy’, Addiction 106: 25–31.10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03158.xGoogle Scholar
Friedman, M. (1974), ‘Explanation and Scientific Understanding’, Journal of Philosophy 71: 5–19.10.2307/2024924Google Scholar
Gombay, A. (1988), ‘Some Paradoxes of Counterprivacy’, Philosophy 63:244: 191–210.10.1017/S0031819100043369Google Scholar
Hammer, R. R., Dingel, M. J., Ostergren, J. E., Nowakowski, K. E. and Koenig, B. A. (2012), ‘The Experience of Addiction as Told by the Addicted: Incorporating Biological Understandings into Self-Story’, Culture, medicine and psychiatry 36:4: 712–34. doi:10.1007/s11013-012-9283-xGoogle Scholar
Heyman, G. (2009), Addiction: A Disorder of Choice. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.10.2307/j.ctvjf9xd9Google Scholar
Hoffman, J. and Froemke, S. (eds). (2007), Addiction: Why Can't They Just Stop? New York: St Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Hyman, J. (2015), Action, Knowledge, and Will. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198735779.001.0001Google Scholar
Hyman, S. E. and Malenka, R. (2001), ‘Addiction and the Brain: The Neurobiology of Compulsion and Its Persistence’, Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2: 695–703.10.1038/35094560Google Scholar
Jaffe, J. H. (1975), ‘Drug Addiction and Drug Abuse’, In Louis S., Goodman and Alfred, Gilman, eds, The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. Fifth edition. Macmillan: New York. Pp. 284–324.Google Scholar
Kitcher, P. (1981), ‘Explanatory Unification’, Philosophy of Science 48:4: 507–31.10.1086/289019Google Scholar
Leshner, A. I. (1997), ‘ Addiction Is A Brain Disease, And It Matters’, Science 278: 45–47.10.1126/science.278.5335.45Google Scholar
Mann, M. (1958), Marty Mann's New Primer on Alcoholism: How People Drink, How to Recognize Alcoholics, and What to do About Them. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Mele, A. R. (1996), ‘Addiction and Self-Control’, Behavior and Philosophy 24: 99–117.Google Scholar
Mele, A. R. (2009), ‘Weakness of the Will and Akrasia’, Philosophical Studies 150:3: 391–404.10.1007/s11098-009-9418-2Google Scholar
Modell, J. G., Glazer, F. B., Cyr, L. and Mounts, J. M. (1992), ‘Obsessive and Compulsive Characteristics of Craving for Alcohol in Alcohol Abuse and Dependence ’, Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 16:2: 272–74.10.1111/j.1530-0277.1992.tb01375.xGoogle Scholar
National Council on Alcoholism and Drug Dependence. ‘NCADD History’. http://www.ncadd.org/images/stories/PDF/history_charts_60_years_1944_2004.pdf http://www.williamwhitepapers.com/pr/AddictionTreatment&RecoveryInAmerica.pdfGoogle Scholar
Neulin, D. B. (2001), ‘The self-perceived survival ability and reproductive fitness (SPFit) theory of substance use disorders’, Addiction 97: 427–45.10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00021.xGoogle Scholar
Nozick, R. (1997), ‘Coercion’ in Socratic Puzzles. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Orsi, F. (2010), ‘The Guise of the Good’, Philosophy Compass 10:10: 714–24.10.1111/phc3.12256Google Scholar
Pickard, H. (2012), ‘The purpose in chronic addiction’, AJOB Neuroscience 3:2: 40–49.10.1080/21507740.2012.663058Google Scholar
Quelquejeu, B. (1972), La volonté dans la philosophie de Hegel. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Roberts, L. W. (2002), ‘Addiction and Consent’, American Journal of Bioethics 2:2: 58–60.10.1162/152651602317533767Google Scholar
Shaffner, K. F. (1967), ‘Approaches to Reduction’, Philosophy of Science 34: 137–47.10.1086/288137Google Scholar
Shelby, C. (2016), Addiction: A Philosophical Perspective. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Stoker, M. (1979), ‘Desiring the Bad: An Essay in Moral Psychology’, The Journal of Philosophy 76:12: 738–53.10.2307/2025856Google Scholar
Sussman, D. (2009), ‘For Badness Sake’, The Journal of Philosophy 106:11: 613–28.10.5840/jphil20091061129Google Scholar
Velleman, J. D. (1999), The Possibility of Practical Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vohs, K. D. and Baumeister, R. F. (2009), ‘Addiction and Free Will’, Addict Res Theory 17:3: 231–35.10.1080/16066350802567103Google Scholar
Wallace, R. J. (1999), ‘Addiction as Defect of the Will: Some Philosophical Reflections’, Law and Philosophy 18:6: 621–54.Google Scholar
Watson, G. (1977), ‘Skepticism about Weakness of the Will’, Philosophical Review 86:3: 316–39.10.2307/2183785Google Scholar
Watson, G. (1999), ‘Excusing Addiction’, Law and Philosophy 18:6: 589–619.Google Scholar
Williams, B. (1985), Ethics and The Limits of Philosophy. London: Fontana Press.Google Scholar
Yaffe, G. (2002), ‘Recent Work on Addiction and Responsible Agency’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 30:2: 178–221.10.1111/j.1088-4963.2001.00178.xGoogle Scholar
Yeomans, C. (2015), The Expansion of Autonomy: Hegel's Pluralistic Philosophy of Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199394548.001.0001Google Scholar
Zellner, M. R, Watt, D. F., Solms, M. and Panskeep, J. (2011), ‘Affective neuroscientific and neuropsychoanalytic approaches to two intractable psychiatric problems: Why depression feels so bad and what addicts really want’, Neuroscience and Behavioural Reviews 35: 2000–8.10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.01.003Google Scholar