Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T15:00:34.446Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hegel and Religion: Avoiding Double Truth, Twice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2013

David Kolb
David Kolb*
Affiliation:
Philosophy Bates College, [email protected], www.dkolb.org
Get access

Abstract

When I was first studying Hegel, I encountered quite divergent readings of his views on religion. The teacher who first presented Hegel to me was a Jesuit, Quentin Lauer at Fordham University, who read Hegel as a Christian theologian providing a better metaphysical system for understanding the doctrines of the Trinity and Incarnation. When I studied at Yale University, Kenley Dove read Hegel as the first thoroughly atheistic philosopher who presented the conditions of thought without reference to any foundational absolute being. Meanwhile, also at Yale, John Findlay read us a deeply Neo-Platonic Hegel who taught about absolute forms held in a cosmic mind. In giving my own reading, I want to talkabout the ways Hegel redefines both metaphysics and religion. I would like to approach these issues by way of the medieval controversy over double truth, which was a previous conflict between religion and science.

In the thirteenth century, Aristotle's scientific and philosophical texts were becoming available in European universities from the Muslims in Spain. These texts offered a well-argued, systematic, and more comprehensive scientific view of the universe and its god. Reading Aristotle, people quickly realised that his ideas contradicted some Christian (and Muslim) doctrines. For example, Aristotle argued that the world could not have had a beginning in time, while the religious revelations told of a first moment of divine creation. Aristotle's obscure treatment of the active intellect seemed to argue that there was no individual immortal soul, while the revelations spoke of individual survival after death. And Aristotle's god, the totally self-absorbed first mover, the pure actuality, seemed useless for religious purposes.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain , Volume 33 , Issue 1 , Spring/Summer 2012 , pp. 71 - 87
Copyright
Copyright © The Hegel Society of Great Britain 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aquinas, T., Summa Contra Gentiles, Summa Theologica, De Ente et Essentia, available online in Latin and English at <www.aquinasonline.com/Texts/>..>Google Scholar
Aristotle, (1960), Metaphysics, ed. and trans. Tredennick, Hugh. Loeb Classical Library, Aristotle XVII–XVIII. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Burbidge, J. W. (1996), Real Process. How Logic and Chemistry Combine in Hegel's Philosophy of Nature. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Burbidge, J. W. (2007), Hegel's Systematic Contingency. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, J. P. (1983) ‘Why I am not a Nominalist’ Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 24:1:93–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, J.P. and Rosen, G. (1997), A Subject with no Object. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Donagan, A. (1988), Spinoza. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Donagan, A. (1996), ‘Spinoza's Theology’, in Garrett, Don (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 343–82.Google Scholar
Eklund, M. (2011), ‘Fictionalism’, in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, <http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/fictionalism>.Google Scholar
French, P. and Wettstein, H. (2001), Midwest Studies in Philosophy Volume XXV: Figurative Language. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Goethe, J. W. (1978), Elective Affinities, trans. Hollingdale, R. J.. London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
Halper, E. (1998). ‘The Logic of Hegel's Philosophy of Nature: Nature, Space and Time’, in Houlgate 1998: 29–49 (also available online at (<http://www.gwfhegel.org/Nature/eh.html>).).' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Halper,+E.+(1998).+‘The+Logic+of+Hegel's+Philosophy+of+Nature:+Nature,+Space+and+Time’,+in+Houlgate+1998:+29–49+(also+available+online+at+().>Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1952), Philosophy of Right, trans. Knox, T. M.. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1959), Die Enzyclopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften (1830). Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1969), The Science of Logic, trans. Miller, A.. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1975), Hegel's Aesthetics: Lectures on Fine Art, trans. Knox, T. M.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1977), Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. Miller, A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1984–87), Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion, ed. Hodgson, P. C., trans. Brown, R. F., Hodgson, P. C., and Stewart, J. M., 3 vols. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1985), Introduction to the Lectures on the History of Philosophy, trans. Knox, T. M. and Miller, A. V.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1988), Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion, One Volume Edition, The Lectures of 1827, ed. Hodgson, P. C., trans. Brown, R. F., Hodgson, P. C., and Stewart, J. M., with the assistance of Harris, H. S.. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1991 confirm date), Hegel's Philosophy of Nature: Encyclopaedia of the Philosophical Sciences (1830), Part II, trans. Miller, A. V.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1991a), The Encyclopaedia Logic, trans. Geraets, T. F., Suchting, W. A., and Harris, H. S.. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (2010), Philosophy of Mind: A revised version of the Wallace and Miller translation, ed. and trans. Inwood, M.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Houlgate, S. (ed.) (1998), Hegel's Philosophy of Nature.Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1995), Opus Postumum, ed. Förster, E. and Rosen, M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (2004), Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science, ed. Friedman, M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kolb, D. (1987), The Critique of Pure Modernity: Hegel, Heidegger, and After. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kolb, D. (2008), ‘Darwin Rocks Hegel: Does Nature Have a History?’, Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 57: 97–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolb, D. (2010), ‘The Necessities of Hegel's Logics’, in Nuzzo 2010: 40–60.Google Scholar
Nadler, S. (2002), Spinoza's Heresy: Immortality and the Jewish Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nuzzo, A. (ed.) (2010), Hegel and the Analytic Tradition. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Pinkard, T. (2000), Hegel: A Biography. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Plato, , (1993) The Sophist. White, N. P. trans. Indianapolis: Hackett Google Scholar
Spinoza, B. (2005), Ethics, trans. Curley, E.. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Stanley, J. (2001), ‘Hermeneutic Fictionalism’, in French and Wettstein 2001: 36–71.Google Scholar
Winfield, R. (1998), ‘Space, Time and Matter: Conceiving Nature Without Foundations’, in Houlgate 1998: 51–68.Google Scholar
Winfield, R. (1998a or 2008??), ‘How Should Essence Be Determined? Reflections on Hegel's Two Divergent Accounts’, International Philosophical Quarterly 48.2, Issue 190: 187–199.Google Scholar
Yablo, S. (1998), ‘Does Ontology Rest on a Mistake?’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Suppl. vol. 72: 229–6. (check pages)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yablo, S. (2001), ‘Go Figure: A Path Through Fictionalism’, in French and Wettstein 2001: 72–102.Google Scholar