Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:21:26.339Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hegel and Bataille on Sacrifice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2018

W. Ezekiel Goggin*
Affiliation:
University of Chicago and University of California, [email protected]; [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

In Georges Bataille’s view, the Hegelian interpretation of kenotic sacrifice as passage from Spirit to the Speculative Idea effaces the necessarily representational character of sacrifice and the irreducible non-presence of death. But Hegel identifies these aspects of death in the fragments of the 1800 System. In sacrificial acts, subjectivity represents its disappearance via the sacrificed other, and hence is negated and conserved. Sacrifice thus provides the representational model of sublation pursued in the Phenomenology as a propaedeutic to Science. Bataille’s critique clarifies the fragments of the 1800 System, contextualizing Hegel’s rehabilitation of kenotic sacrifice in the Phenomenology. Bataille’s poetics parodies Hegelian kenosis via repetition of material difference, enacting an ecstatic temporality which Hegel perhaps suppresses as the condition of his system. Finally—if Bataille is correct in his assessment—the system would be subjected to a reversal, with radical implications for the philosophy of religion.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© The Hegel Society of Great Britain 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ameriks, K. (2000), Kant and the Fate of Autonomy: Problems in the Appropriation of the Critical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Balthasar, H. U. V. (1991), The Glory of the Lord: A Theological Aesthetics 5, trans. B. McNeil, J. Riches and O. Davis. San Francisco: Ignatius.Google Scholar
Baugh, B. (2003), French Hegel: From Surrealism to Postmodernism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bubbio, P. D. (2014), Sacrifice in the Post-Kantian Tradition: Perspectivism, Intersubjectivity, and Recognition. Albany: SUNY.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1973), Speech and Phenomena, and Other Essays on Husserl’s Theory of Signs, trans. D. Allison. Evanston IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1978), Writing and Difference (reprint edition), trans. A. Bass. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Förster, E. (2017), The Twenty-Five Years of Philosophy: A Systematic Reconstruction, trans. B. Bowman. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1984), Hegel: The Letters, trans. and ed. C. Butler. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1993), The Difference between Fichte’s and Schelling’s System of Philosophy , trans. W. Cerf and H. S. Harris. Albany: SUNY.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (2011), Natural Law: The Scientific Ways of Treating Natural Law, Its Place in Moral Philosophy, and Its Relation to the Positive Sciences of Law, trans. T. M. Knox. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Hölderlin, F. (1986), ‘Judgment and Being’, trans. P. Adler, Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 11:1: 1718.Google Scholar
Hollier, D. (1992), Against Architecture: The Writings of Georges Bataille, trans. B. Wing. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (2015), Critique of Practical Reason (2nd edition), trans. M. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kendall, S. (2007), Georges Bataille. London: Reaktion.Google Scholar
Kojève, A. (1980), Introduction à la lecture de Hegel: Leçons sur la Phénoménologie de l’Esprit professées de 1933 à 1939 à l’École des Hautes Études, ed. R. Queneau. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. (1990), The Twilight of the Idols and the Anti-Christ: Or How to Philosophize with a Hammer (reissue edition), ed. M. Tanner, trans. R. J. Hollingdale. London: Penguin.Google Scholar