Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T15:02:57.235Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Celebrity Election versus Lottery Selection: A Reconsideration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2013

Get access

Abstract

In The Just State, Richard Dien Winfield has completed his exposition of the immanent logic of ethical life, the earlier parts of which are developed in his books The Just Economy, The Just Family, and Law in Civil Society. The purpose of his exposition is not to discuss isolated or miscellaneous topics pertaining to politics or ethics. Instead, his goal from the beginning has been to show objectively what justice looks like when it is fully embodied in a state's political and social institutions. The just state, as he presents it, is simply the largest possible political framework for maintaining equitable arrangements within a country's already established civil society, a framework that permits civil society to adjust to new contingencies as they arise, be they domestic or international. The purpose of the just state is to preserve, not to tamper with, the political and nonpolitical freedoms of its citizens. The essence of these freedoms is that they are all modes of self-determination, whereby what one does is freely determined by oneself and not by the arbitrary controlling authority of others. An individual whose life is determined by family, by tradition, or by commandment, is unfree. A state whose people are imposed on by a leadership class, or by any authority other than that of the people themselves, is likewise unfree. In order to establish freedom and justice, the citizens of a sovereign state must codetermine their own institutions. In accordance with this purpose, their institutions must be constructed in a particular way, which is the subject of The Just State.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Hegel Society of Great Britain 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Pearson Education, Inc. (2011), ‘National Voter Turnout in Federal Elections: 1960-2010’, <http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0781453.html>>Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J. E. (2011), ‘Of the 1%, by the 1%, for the 1%’, Vanity Fair, <http://www.vanityfair.com/society/features/2011/05/top-one-percent-201105>>Google Scholar
Winfield, R. D. (2005), The Just State: Rethinking Self-Government. Amherst: Humanity Books.Google Scholar
Winfield, R. D. (1998), The Just Family. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Winfield, R. D. (1995), Law in Civil Society. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Winfield, R. D. (1988), The Just Economy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar