Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T16:56:33.916Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The special interdisciplinary contribution of institutional economics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2013

David Chinitz
David Chinitz*
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, School of Public Health, Hebrew University-Hadassah Jerusalem
*
*Correspondence to: David Chinitz, Hebrew University School of Public Health, PO Box 12272, Jerusalem 91220, Israel. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Special Section
Information
Health Economics, Policy and Law , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , July 2013 , pp. 387 - 396
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ariely, D. (2010), Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces that Shape Our Decisions, New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Bardach, E. (2011), A Practical Guide for Policy Analysis: The Eightfold Path to More Effective Problem Solving, Thousand Oaks: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, F.Jones, B. (1993), Agendas and Instability in American Politics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Blustein, J., Marmor, T. (1994), ‘Cutting Waste by Making Rules’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review 140:5.Google Scholar
Brown, L. D. (2010), ‘Pedestrian paths: why path-dependence theory leaves health policy analysis lost in space’, J Health Polit Policy Law, 35(4): 643–661.Google Scholar
Chinitz, D., Meislin, R.Grau, I. (2009), ‘Values, institutions and shifting policy paradigms’, Health Policy, 90: 37–44.Google Scholar
Hardin, R. (2006), Trust, Key Concepts, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Kahan, N. R., Kahan, E., Kitai, S.Chinitz, D. (2009), ‘The tools of an evidence based culture’, Acad Med, 84: 9–1225.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. (2011), Thinking-Fast and Slow Farrer, New York: Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Kingdon, J. (2010), Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies, 2nd edition, Chicago: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Klein, R.Day, P. (1998), ‘Rationing health care: the dilemma of choice’, Odyssey, 4(2): 8–13.Google Scholar
Lindblom, C. (1959), ‘The science of muddling through’, Public Administration Review, 19(2): 79–88.Google Scholar
Marmor, T. R.Klein, R. (2012), Politics, Health, Health Care, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Oberlander, J., Jacobs, J.Marmor, T. R. (2001), ‘State Policy Making and the Politics of Health Care Rationing: Lessons from Oregon’, in R. Hackey and Rocheforteds (eds), The New Politics of State Health Policy, Lawrence: University of Kansas Press, 207–226.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E.Walker, J. eds (2005), Trust and Reciprocity Interdisciplinary Lessons for Experimental Research, New York: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Pessali, H. F. (2006), The Metaphors of Transaction Cost Economics, Parana: Federal University of Brazil.Google Scholar
Porter, M. (2010), ‘Defining value in health care new’, New England Journal of Medicine, 363: 2477–2481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, M., Larson, S.Ingvar, M. (2012), ‘A new initiative to put outcomes measurement at the center of health reform’, Health Affairs Blog, October 31.Google Scholar
Schwartz, H. (2002), ‘Herbert Simon and behavior economics’, Journal of Socio Economics, 31: 181–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1951), Models of Bounded Rationality. Behavioral Economics and Business Organization, Vol. 2. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1978), ‘Rationality as process and product of thought’, Am Economic Rev, 68(2): 1–15.Google Scholar
Thaler, R. H.Sunstein, C. R. (2010), Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health Wealth and Happiness, London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Titmuss, R. M., Oakley, A.Ashton, J. (1997), The Gift Relationship: From Human Blood to Social Policy, New York: New Press.Google Scholar
Wildavsky, A. (1979), Spaking Truth to Power, Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Wilsford, D. (1994), ‘Path dependency, or why history makes it difficult but not impossible to reform health care systems in a big way’, Journal of Public Policy, 14(3): 251–283.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. (1975), Markets and Hierarchies, Analysis and Antitrust Implications, Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. (1980), ‘The organization of work’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1: 5.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. (1981), An Economist's View of Sacharrin, in R. Crandall and L. Lave (eds), The Scientific Basis of Health an Safety Regulation, Washington: Brookings, 131–151.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. (1993), ‘Calculativeness, trust, and economic organization’, Journal of Law and Economics, 36: 453–486.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. (2007), Transaction Cost Economics: an Introdcution. Economics Discussion Papers, Discussion Paper 2007-3.Google Scholar