Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:12:26.359Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response to our critics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2015

Alex Voorhoeve ,
Trygve Ottersen  and
Ole Fritjof Norheim
Alex Voorhoeve*
Affiliation:
Philosophy, Logic, and Scientific Method, London School of Economics, UK
Trygve Ottersen
Affiliation:
Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Norway
Ole Fritjof Norheim
Affiliation:
Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Norway
*
*Correspondence to: Alex Voorhoeve, Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE, UK. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Special Section
Information
Health Economics, Policy and Law , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , January 2016 , pp. 103 - 111
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brock, D. (2003), ‘Separate spheres and indirect benefits’, Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, 1: 1–12.Google Scholar
Claxton, K., Martin, S., Soares, M., Rice, N., Spackman, E. and Hinde, S. (2013), ‘Methods for the Estimation of the NICE Cost Effectiveness Threshold’, Final Report, CHE Research Paper, Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York.Google Scholar
Littlejohns, P. and Chalkidou, K. (2015), ‘Information will be the key to successful implementation’, Health Economics, Policy and Law, this issue.Google Scholar
Morris, S., Sutton, M. and Gravelle, H. (2005), ‘Inequity and inequality in the use of health care in England: an empirical investigation’, Social Science & Medicine, 60(6): 1251–1266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prakongsai, P., Palmer, N., Uay-Trakul, P., Tangcharoensathien, V. and Mills, A. (2009), ‘The implications of benefit package design: the impact on poor thai households of excluding renal replacement therapy’, Journal of International Development, 21(2): 291–308.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1999), A Theory of Justice, 2nd rev edn, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rumbold, B. and Wilson, J. (2015), ‘Reasonable disagreement and the generally unacceptable: a philosophical analysis of making fair choices’, Health Economics, Policy and Law, this issue.Google Scholar
Tamire Woldemariam, A. (2015), ‘The administrator’s perspective’, Health Economics, Policy and Law, this issue.Google Scholar
Teerawattananon, Y., Mugford, M. and Tangcharoensathien, V. (2007), ‘Economic evaluation of palliative management versus peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis for end-stage renal disease: evidence for coverage decisions in Thailand’, Value in Health, 10: 61–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weale, A. (2015), ‘The path from nowhere?’, Health Economics, Policy and Law, this issue.Google Scholar
WHO (2010), ‘Thailand: health care for all, at a price’, Bull World Health Organ, 88: 84–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WHO (2014), ‘Making Fair Choices on the Path to Universal Health Coverage’, Final Report of the WHO Consultative Group on Equity and Universal Health Coverage, Geneva.Google Scholar