Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T00:34:21.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the socio-economic determinants of antenatal care utilization in Azerbaijan: evidence and policy implications for reforms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2010

Nazim N. Habibov
Nazim N. Habibov*
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, School of Social Work, University of Windsor, Ontario, Canada
*
*Correspondence to: Professor Nazim Habibov, School of Social Work, University of Windsor, 401 Sunset Avenue, Windsor, Ontario, N9B 3P4, Canada. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Azerbaijan is a country with one of the highest child mortality rates in the regions of Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. Drawing on the nationally representative Demographic and Health Survey, this study examines the utilization of antenatal care in Azerbaijan to identify the socio-economic determinants of the usage, and its frequency, timing and quality. Consequently, binomial logit, two ordered logit and negative binomial regression models are specified to estimate the effect of various socio-economic characteristics on the likelihood of utilization. Place of living is an important determinant of antenatal healthcare utilization in Azerbaijan. It is important in determining the likelihood of utilization, its timing and quality of care received, whereas it is not significant in the model predicting the frequency of antenatal utilization. Women’s education is also significant in three models out of four. Education is important in explaining the frequency and timing of utilization as well as the quality of services received, but it is not significant in predicting the likelihood of utilization. Wealth gradient is another important determinant of antenatal care utilization in Azerbaijan inasmuch as it is significant in explaining the likelihood of prenatal care utilization and its frequency. In addition, two variables, birth order and desirability of the last child or current pregnancy, are significant only in explaining the likelihood of utilization. Therefore, we confirm the findings of previous studies, which reported that the utilization of prenatal health care is a multistage process in which decisions are sequential. Although the same set of factors may affect decision-making at all stages, the effect of these factors is different at different stages. Implications for reforms in the healthcare sector to improve antenatal care utilization in Azerbaijan are provided and discussed.

Type
Articles
Information
Health Economics, Policy and Law , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , 16 March 2011 , pp. 175 - 203
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Academy of Preventive Medicine (APM) (2000), Kazakhstan Demographic and Health Survey 1999, Almaty, Kazakhstan: APM and Macro International Inc.Google Scholar
Angel-Urdinola, D.Jain, S. (2006), ‘Do Subsidized Health Programs in Armenia Increase Utilization among the Poor’? World Bank Policy Research Working Paper no. 4017. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, S.Gertler, P. (2008), ‘Empowering women to obtain high quality care: evidence from an evaluation of Mexico’s conditional cash transfer programme’, Health Policy and Planning, 24(1): 18–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baschieri, A.Falkingham, F. (2009), ‘Spatially disaggregated estimates of poverty in Azerbaijan: asset indices versus imputed welfare’, Journal of Economic and Social Measurement, 34(2): 87–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betley, M. (2004), ‘Public Expenditures in the CIS-7 Countries’, in C. Shiells and S. Sattar (eds), The Low-Income Countries of Commonwealth of Independent States. Progress and Challenges in Transition, Washington, DC: The International Monetary Fund: 109–140.Google Scholar
Bollen, K., Glanville, J.Stecklov, G. (2001), ‘Economic Status Proxies in Studies of Fertility in Developing Countries: Do The Measure Matter’? Measure Evaluation Working Papers, WP-01-38. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Celik, Y.Hotchkiss, D. R. (2000), ‘The socio-economic determinants of maternal health care utilisation in Turkey’, Social Science and Medicine, 50(12): 1797–1806.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2003), Eastern Europe and Eurasia Comparative Study Reproductive, Maternal and Child Health in Eastern Europe and Eurasia: A Comparative Report, CDC, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
Erci, B. (2003), ‘Barriers to utilization of antenatal care services in Turkey’, Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 35(3): 269–273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fan, L.Habibov, N. (2008), ‘Targeting social assistance benefits in Azerbaijan: what we can learn from a household survey?’, International Journal of Social Welfare, 17(4): 346–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fan, L.Habibov, N. (2009), ‘Determinants of maternity health care utilization in Tajikistan: learning from a national living standards survey’, Health & Place, 15(4): 952–960.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Falkingham, J. (2003), ‘Inequality and changes in woman’s use of maternal health-care services in Tajikistan’, Studies in Family Planning, 34: 32–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falkingham, J. (2004), ‘Poverty, out-of-pocket payments and access to health care: evidence from Tajikistan’, Social Science and Medicine, 58: 247–258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Filmer, D.Pritchett, L. (2001), ‘Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data – or tears: an application to educational enrollments in states of India’, Demography, 38(1): 115–132.Google ScholarPubMed
Fuller, W. (2009), Sampling Statistics, Hoboken, NJ: Willey Publication.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Government of Azerbaijan Republic (2003), State Programme on Poverty Reduction and Economic Development, Baku: Azerbaijan Republic.Google Scholar
Government of Azerbaijan Republic (2004), State Programme of Economic Development of Regions for the Years of 2004–2008, Baku: Azerbaijan Republic.Google Scholar
Government of Tajikistan (GoT) (2005), ‘Poverty reduction strategy paper’, Second Progress Report, Dushanbe: GRT.Google Scholar
Gotsadze, G., Bennett, S., Ranson, K.Gzirishvili, D. (2005), ‘Health care-seeking behaviour and out-of-pocket payments in Tbilisi, Georgia’, Health Policy and Planning, 20: 222–242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guo, Y., Feng, X., Shi, G., Wang, Y., Xu, L., Luo, H., Shen, J., Yin, H. (2009), An Impact Evaluation of the Safe Motherhood Program in China, New Dehli: Global Development Network. Global Development Network Working Paper Series no. 7.Google Scholar
Gwatkin, D., Rutstein, S., Johnson, K., Suliman, E., Wagstaff, A.Amouzou, A. (2007), Socio-Economic Differences in Health, Nutrition, and Population Within Developing Countries, Washington, DC: World Bank.Google ScholarPubMed
Habibov, N. (in press), ‘Hospitalization in Tajikistan: determinants of admission, length of stay and out-of-pocket expenditures. Results of a national survey’, International Journal of Health Planning and Management, doi:10.1002/hpm.972.Google Scholar
Habibov, N. (2009), ‘Determinants of out-of-pocket expenditures on prescribed medications in Tajikistan: implications for healthcare sector reform’, Journal of Health Organization and Management, 23(2): 170–182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Habibov, N.Fan, L. (2008), ‘Modelling antenatal health care utilization in Tajikistan using a two-stage approach: implications for policy and research’, Health Policy and Planning, 23(6): 443–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handa, S.Davis, B. (2006), ‘The experience of conditional cash transfers in Latin America and the Caribbean’, Development Policy Review, 24(5): 513–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houweling, T., Ronsmans, C., Camplbell, O.Kunst, A. (2007), ‘Huge poor-rich inequalities in maternity care: an international comparative study of maternity and child care in developing countries’, Bulletin of the World Health Organizations, 85: 745–754.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies (HUIPS) (2004), Turkey Demographic and Health Survey, 2003, Ankara, Turkey: HUIPS.Google Scholar
Levy, P.Lemeshow, S. (2008), Sampling of Populations: Methods and Applications, 4th edn, New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, S.Freese, J. (2006), Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata, College Station, TX: STATA Press Publication.Google Scholar
Kohler, U.Kreuter, F. (2008), Data Analysis Using Stata, 2nd edn, College Station, TX: Stata Press.Google Scholar
Magadi, M. A., Madise, N. J.Rodrigues, R. N. (2000), ‘Frequency and timing of antenatal care in Kenya: explaining the variations between women of different communities’, Social Science and Medicine, 51(4): 551–561.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matsumura, M.Gubhaju, B. (2001), ‘Women’s status household structure and the utilisation of maternal health services in Nepal’, Asia-Pacific Population Journal, 16(1): 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, Z., Mahendra, S., Kilaru, A.Ganapathy, S. (2001), ‘Antenatal care, care-seeking and morbidityin rural Karnataka, India: results of a prospective study’, Asia-Pacific Population Journal, 16(2): 11–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKee, M., Healy, J.Falkingham, J. (2002), Health Care in Central Asia, Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Miles-Doan, R.Brewster, K. L. (1998), ‘The impact of type of employment on women’s use of prenatal-care services and family planning in urban Cebu, the Philippines’, Studies in Family Planning, 29(1): 69–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montgomery, M., Gragnolati, M., Burke, K.Paredes, E. (2000), ‘Measuring living standards with proxy variables’, Demography, 37(2): 155–174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Scientific and Applied Center for Preventive Medicine (NCPM) (2006), Moldova Demographic and Health Survey 2005, Calverton, MA: NCPM and ORC Macro.Google Scholar
Nielsen, B., Hedegaard, M., Liljestrand, J., Thilsted, S. H.Joseph, A. (2001), ‘Characteristics of antenatal care attenders in a rural population in Tamil Nadu, South India: a community-based cross-sectional study’, Health and Social Care in the Community, 9(6): 327–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nisar, N.White, F. (2003), ‘Factors affecting utilization of antenatal care among reproductive age group women (15–49 years) in an urban squatter settlement of Karachi’, JPMA – Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, 53(2): 47–53.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, O., van Doorslaer, E., Wagstaff, A.Lindelow, M. (2008), Analyzing Health Equity Using Household Survey Data. A Guide to Techniques and Their Implementation, Washington: World Bank.Google Scholar
Paredes, I., Hidalgo, L., Chedraui, P., Palma, J.Eugenio, J. (2005), ‘Factors associated with inadequate antenatal care in Ecuadorian women’, International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 88(2): 168–172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rani, M., Bonu, S.Harvey, S. (2008), ‘Differential in the quality of antenatal care in India’, International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 20(1): 62–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rutstein, S.Johnson, K. (2004), The Wealth Index, Calverton, MA: ORC Macro.Google Scholar
Say, L.Raine, R. (2007), ‘A systematic review of inequalities in the use of maternal health care in developing countries: examining the scale of the problem and the importance of the context’, Bulletin of the World Health Organizations, 85: 812–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sepehri, A., Sarma, S., Simpson, W.Moshiri, S. (2008), ‘How important are individual, household and commune characteristics in explaining utilization of maternal health services in Vietnam?’, Social Science and Medicine, 67: 1009–1017.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sharma, B. (2004), ‘Utilisation of antenatal care services in Nepal’, Nepal Population Journal, 11(10): 79–97.Google Scholar
Simkhada, B., van Teijingen, E., Porter, M.Simkhada, P. (2008), ‘Factors affecting the utilization of antenatal care in developing countries: systematic review of the literature’, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 61(3): 244–260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
State Statistical Committee of Azerbaijan (SSC) and Macro International Inc. (2008), Azerbaijan Demographic and Health Survey 2006, Calverton, MA: SSC and Macro International Inc.Google Scholar
Sunil, T. S., Rajaram, S.Zottarelli, L. (2006), ‘Do individual and program factors matter in the utilization of maternal care services in rural India? A theoretical approach’, Social Science and Medicine, 62: 1943–1957.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trivedi, P. (2002), Patterns of Health Care Utilization in Vietnam: Analysis of 1997-98 Vietnam Living Standards Survey Data. Policy Research Working Paper no. 2775. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UNICEF (2000), Azerbaijan Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey 2000, Baku: UNICEF.Google Scholar
WHO (2005), World Health Report 2005, Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
World Bank (2003), Azerbaijan Republic Poverty Assessment (in two volumes), Volume II: The Main Report, Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank (2005a), Azerbaijan Health Sector Review Note (in two volumes), Volume I: Main Report, Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank (2005b), Azerbaijan Health Sector Review Note (in two volumes), Volume II: Background Papers, Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar