Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T06:51:19.491Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

NFIB vs Sebelius: the political expediency of the Roberts court

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2013

Michael K. Gusmano
Michael K. Gusmano*
Affiliation:
Associate Professor of Health Policy and Management, New York Medical College, NY, USA
*
*Correspondence to: Dr Michael K. Gusmano, New York Medical College and The Hastings Center, 515 Munger Hall, Valhalla, NY 10524, USA. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Special Section
Information
Health Economics, Policy and Law , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , January 2013 , pp. 119 - 124
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Casillas, C. J., Enns, P. K.Wohlfarth, P. C. (2011), ‘How public opinion constrains the U.S. Supreme Court’, American Journal of Political Science, 55(1): 74–88.Google Scholar
Cohn, J. (2012), ‘Is the Court's legitimacy really at stake?’, The New Republic, April 2, http://www.tnr.com/blog/jonathan-cohn/102254/supreme-court-obamacare-legitimacy-mandate-bush-gore# [29 October 2012].Google Scholar
Durr, R. H., Martin, A. D.Wolbrecht, C. (2000), ‘Ideological divergence and public support for the supreme court’, American Journal of Political Science, 44(4): 768–776.Google Scholar
Klarman, M. J. (2004), ‘Brown at 50’, University of Virginia Law School Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper Series, Paper 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, E. (2012), ‘Unpopular Mandate: Why do politicians reverse their positions?’, The New Yorker, June 25, http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2012/06/25/120625fa_fact_klein [25 October 2012].Google Scholar
Liptak, A.Kopicki, A. (2012), ‘Approval rating for justices hits just 44% in new poll’, New York Times, June 8: A1.Google Scholar
Metzger, G. E., Morrison, T. W., Pincus, A. J. 2012. ‘Brief of Constitutional Law Scholars as Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioners’, In the Supreme Court of the United States, No. 11–398.Google Scholar
Nicholson, S. P.Howard, R. M. (2003), ‘Framing support for the supreme court in the aftermath of Bush v. Gore’, The Journal of Politics, 65(3): 676–695.Google Scholar
Tau, B. (2012), ‘Toobin: Health Law ‘Looks Like it's Going to be Struck Down’ ’, Politico, March 27, http://www.politico.com/politico44/2012/03/toobin-health-law-looks-like-its-going-to-be-struck-118811.html [28 October 2012).Google Scholar