Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T00:59:40.094Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The interplay between central and sub-central levels: the development of a systemic standard based programme for governing medical performance in Denmark

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2009

KARSTEN VRANGBAEK
KARSTEN VRANGBAEK*
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
*
*Correspondence to: Karsten Vrangbæk, Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, DK-1353 København K, Denmark. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper analyses the introduction of a systemic standards based programme for governing medical performance in Denmark. The programme combines clinical, organisational, and patient related standards and measures, and contains both external evaluation and self-assessment based on standards. The substance of the programme is new compared to the previous decentralised or professionally driven state of affairs that was based on a largely voluntary introduction of clinical standards, combined with a case-by-case evaluation of malpractice incidents. The programme strengthens hierarchy-based forms of governance; these co-exist with salient components of network-based governance as well as some elements of market-based governance. Institutional and contextual factors are important in explaining why a systemic standards based programme emerged as a result of the policy negotiation processes. In particular, the programme reflects stronger governance ambitions from the government in response to claims of a relative decline in the quality of the regional health services. However, the actual design is mediated by institutionalised negotiation processes among the state, decentralised authorities, and health professionals.

Type
Articles
Information
Health Economics, Policy and Law , Volume 4 , Issue 3: Governing Medical Performance: A Comparative Analysis of Pathways of Change , July 2009 , pp. 305 - 327
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amtsrådsforeningen (2001), National landsdækkende kvalitetspolitik, Notat. Maj 2001, København:Google Scholar
Bundgaard, U. and Vrangbæk, K. (2007), ‘Reform by coincidence? Explaining the policy process of structural reform in Denmark’, Scandinavian Political Studies (in press).Google Scholar
Heinskou, T. (2005), ‘Akkreditering som ledelsesstrategi’ (Accreditation as management strategy), Ugeskrift for Læger, 5(167): 536–538.Google Scholar
Jespersen, P. K. (2005), Mellem profession og management. Ledelse i danske sygehuse, København: Handelshøjskolens forlag.Google Scholar
Knudsen, J. L., Fugleholm, A. M. and Kjærgård, J. (2004), ‘Kvalitetsvurdering i sundhedsvæsenet I. Beslutningen om Den Danske kvalitetsmodel’ (Quality assessment in Danish health care. The decision process behind the systemic standards based programme), Ugeskrift for læger. 166(19).Google ScholarPubMed
NBoH website, The National Board of Health, http://www.sst.dk/.Google Scholar
Pedersen, K. M. (2005), Sundhedspolitik (Health Politics), Odense: Syddansk Universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
Power, M. (1997), The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Regeringen and Amtsrådsforeningen (2001), Aftale mellem Regeringen og Amtsrådsforeningen den 15.Juni 2001 om amternes økonomi i 2002, København: Regeringen og Amtsrådsforeningen (Budget agreement between the Government and the Association of County Councils (2001)).Google Scholar
Røvik, K. A. (1998), Moderne organisasjoner: trender i organisasjonstenkningen ved tusenårsskiftet (Modern Organisations. Trends at the Turn of the Century), Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.Google Scholar
Strukturkommissionen (2004), Betænkning nr. 1434 January 2004, Final Report from the Government's Structural Commission.Google Scholar
Sundhedsstyrelsen (2001a), Kvalitetsvurdering i sundhedsvæsenet, Del A. Forslag til en national model, København: Sundhedsstyrelsen.Google Scholar
Sundhedsstyrelsen (2001b), Kvalitetsvurdering i sundhedsvæsenet, Del B. Baggrund for forslag til en national model, København: Sundhedsstyrelsen.Google Scholar
Sundhedsstyrelsen (2004), Den Danske Kvalitetsmodel for Sundhedsvæsenet. Modelbeskrivelse, Version 1.3, København: Sundhedsstyrelsen (The Danish Quality Assessment Program: Program Description).Google Scholar
Vallgårda, S. and Krasnik, A. (2007), Sundhedsvæsen og Sundhedspolitik, Copenhagen: Munksgaard Danmark (Health System and Health Policy).Google Scholar
Vrangbæk, K. and Christiansen, T. (2005), ‘Health policy in Denmark. Leaving the decentralized welfare path?’, Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law. 30(1–2): 29–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vrangbæk, K. and Røpke, S. (2007), ‘Den Danske kvalitetsmodel for sundhedsvæsenet. Regulering, politik og profession’ (The Danish Quality Assessment Program. Regulation, politics and profession), Økonomi og Politik (in press).Google Scholar