Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T14:16:43.216Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Choice policies in Northern European health systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2012

Karsten Vrangbaek ,
Ruth Robertson ,
Ulrika Winblad ,
Hester Van de Bovenkamp  and
Anna Dixon
Karsten Vrangbaek*
Affiliation:
Director of Research, AKF Danish Institute of Governmental Research and University of Copenhagen, Denmark
Ruth Robertson
Affiliation:
Senior Research Associate, The Commonwealth Fund, USA
Ulrika Winblad
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Sweden
Hester Van de Bovenkamp
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Anna Dixon
Affiliation:
Director of Policy, The King's Fund, London, UK
*
*Correspondence to: Karsten Vrangbaek, Director of Research, AKF Danish Institute of Governmental Research, Købmagergade 22, 1150 København K, Denmark. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper compares the introduction of policies to promote or strengthen patient choice in four Northern European countries – Denmark, England, the Netherlands and Sweden. The paper examines whether there has been convergence in choice policies across Northern Europe. Following Christopher Pollitt's suggestion, the paper distinguishes between rhetorical (discursive) convergence, decision (design) convergence and implementation (operational) convergence (Pollitt, 2002). This leads to the following research question for the article: Is the introduction of policies to strengthen choice in the four countries characterised by discursive, decision and operational convergence? The paper concludes that there seems to be convergence among these four countries in the overall policy rhetoric about the objectives associated with patient choice, embracing both concepts of empowerment (the intrinsic value) and market competition (the instrumental value). It appears that the institutional context and policy concerns such as waiting times have been important in affecting the timing of the introduction of choice policies and implementation, but less so in the design of choice policies. An analysis of the impact of choice policies is beyond the scope of this paper, but it is concluded that further research should investigate how the institutional context and timing of implementation affect differences in how the choice policy works out in practice.

Type
Articles
Information
Health Economics, Policy and Law , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , 05 January 2012 , pp. 47 - 71
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Appleby, K., Harrison, T.Devlin, N. (2003), What is the Real Cost of More Patient Choice?, London: The King's Fund, Available from: http://www.kingsfund.org.uk/publications/what_is_the_real.html [accessed 11 October 2011].Google Scholar
Arrow, K. J. (1963), ‘Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care’, The American Economic Review, 53(5): 941–973.Google Scholar
Bal, R. (2008), De nieuwe zichtbaarheid: sturing in tijden van marktwerking, Rotterdam: Erasmus MC.Google Scholar
Bal, R.Zuiderent-Jerak, T. (2011), ‘The practice of markets: are we drinking from the same glass?’, Health Economics, Policy and Law, 6(1): 139–145.Google Scholar
Blank, R.Burau, V. (2010), Comparative Health Policy, 3rd edition, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Boonen, L. H. H. M., Laske-Aldershof, T.Schut, F. T. (2009), Het effect van CQ-informatie op de keuze voor een zorgverzekeraar, Rotterdam: iBMG Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Borst, E. (2001), Met zorg kiezen: De toerusting van patiënten en consumenten in een vraaggestuurde zorg, Den Haag: Ministerie van VWS.Google Scholar
Bouckaert, G.Pollitt, C. (2000), Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boyce, T., Dixon, A., Fasolo, B.Reutskaja, E. (2010), Choosing a High-Quality Hospital: The Role of Nudges, Scorecard Design and Information, London: The King's Fund.Google Scholar
British Medical Association (2009), ‘BMA launches “Look after our NHS” ’. Press release [online] (2009), available from: http://web2.bma.org.uk/pressrel.nsf/wlu/SGOY-7SLHBC?OpenDocument&vw=wfmms [accessed 11 October 2011].Google Scholar
Cooper, Z. N., Gibbons, S., Jones, S.McGuire, A. (2009a), Does Hospital Competition Save Lives? Evidence from the Recent English NHS Choice Reforms, London: LSE, Available at: http://personal.lse.ac.uk/gibbons/Papers/Does%20Hospital%20Competition%20Save%20Lives%20Dec%2009.pdf [accessed 11 October 2011].Google Scholar
Cooper, Z. N., McGuire, A., Jones, S.Le Grand, J. (2009b), ‘Equity, waiting times and NHS reforms: retrospective study’, British Medical Journal, 339: b3264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Damman, O. C. (2010), Public Reporting About Healthcare Users’ Experiences: The Consumer Quality Index, Tilburg: Universiteit van Tilburg.Google Scholar
Department of Health (DH) (2003), Building on the Best: Choice Responsiveness and Equity in the NHS, London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
DH (2004), The NHS Improvement Plan: Putting People at the Heart of Public Services, London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
DH (2009a), The National Health Service Constitution, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
DH (2010b), ‘Report on the National Patient Choice Survey’, England – February 2010, available from: http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsStatistics/DH_116958 [accessed 11 October 2011].Google Scholar
Dixon, A.Le Grand, J. (2006), ‘Is greater patient choice consistent with equity? The case of the English NHS’, Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 11(3): 162–166.Google Scholar
Dixon, A., Robertson, R., Appleby, J., Burge, P., Devlin, N.Magee, H. (2010a), Patient Choice: How Patients Choose and How Providers Respond, London: The King's Fund.Google Scholar
Dixon, A., Robertson, R.Baal, R. (2010b), ‘The experience of implementing choice at point of referral: a comparison of the Netherlands and England’, Health Economics, Policy and Law, 5(3): 295–317.Google Scholar
Dorgelo, A., Hekkink, C. F.Bakx, J. C. H. (2008), Kennissynthese kiezen in de zorg: Preferenties en Competenties van Zorggebruikers, Woerden: NIGZ.Google Scholar
Enthoven, A. C. (1978), ‘Consumer choice health plan: a national health insurance proposal based on regulated competition in the private sector’, The New England Journal of Medicine, 298: 709–720.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Enthoven, A. C.Kronick, R. (1989), ‘A consumer-choice health plan for the 1990s: universal health insurance in a system designed to promote quality and economy’, New England Journal of Medicine, 320(1): 29–37.Google Scholar
Fredriksson, M.Winblad, U. (2008), ‘Consequences of a decentralised healthcare governance model: measuring regional authority support for patient choice in Sweden’, Social Science & Medicine, 67(10): 271–279.Google Scholar
Friele, R. D., Albada, A.Sluijs, E. (2006), Patiënten over hun rechten in de gezondheidszorg: een overzichtsstudie, Utrecht: Nivel.Google Scholar
Greener, I., Mills, N., Powell, M., Doheny, S. (2006), ‘How did Consumerism get into the NHS? An Empirical Examination of Choice and Responsiveness in NHS Policy Documents’. ESRC Cultures of Consumption, Working Paper no. 29, available at: www.consume.bbk.ac.uk/working_papers/GreenerOctober20061.doc [accessed 12 October 2011].Google Scholar
Grit, K., Van de Bovenkamp, H.Bal, R. (2008), Positie van de zorggebruiker in een veranderend stelsel. Een quick scan van aandachtspunten en wetenschappelijke inzichten, Rotterdam: iBMG.Google Scholar
Helderman, J.-K., Schut, F. T., Van der Grinten, T. E. D.Van de Ven, W. P. M. M. (2005), ‘Market-oriented health care reforms and policy learning in the Netherlands’, Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 30(1–2): 189–210.Google Scholar
Hood, C. (1991), ‘A public management for all seasons?’, Public Administration, 69: 3–19.Google Scholar
Immergut, E. (1992), Health Politics, Interests and Institutions in Western Europe, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kettl, D. (2000), The Global Public Management Revolution: A Report on the Transformation of Governance, Washington: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, I., Jespersen, P. K., Dent, M.Neogy, I. (2009), ‘Medicine and management in a comparative perspective: the case of Denmark and England’, Sociology of Health and Illness, 31(5): 642–658.Google Scholar
Klink, A. (2009a), Ruimte en rekenschap voor zorg en ondersteuning, Den Haag: Ministerie van VWS.Google Scholar
Klink, A. (2009b), Brief naar aanleiding van Algemeen Overleg governance in de zorg, Den Haag: Ministerie van VWS.Google Scholar
Labour (2001), Ambitions for Britain. Labour's manifesto 2001. Avaliable at: http://www.pixunlimited.co.uk/pdf/news/election/labourmanifesto1.pdf [accessed 12 October 2011].Google Scholar
Le Grand, J. (2007), The Other Invisible Hand: Delivering Public Service through Competition and Choice, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lipsky, M. (1983), Street Level Bureaucracy: The Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services, New York: Russell Sage Foundation Publications.Google Scholar
Lynn, L. (2006), Public Management: Old and New, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Martinsen, D.Blomquist, P. (2009), ‘The European Union: Single Market Pressures’, in J. Magnussen, K. Vrangbæk and R. B. Saltman (eds), Nordic Health Care Systems. Recent Reforms and Current Policy Strategies, Berkshire: McGraw Hill, Open University Press, 294–316.Google Scholar
Mazmanian, D.Sabatier, P. (1981), Effective Policy Implementation, Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, K., Osborne, S. P.Ferlie, E. (eds) (2002), New Public Management: Current Trends and Future Prospects, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Naylor, C.Gregory, S. (2009), Independent Sector Treatment Centres, London: The King's Fund.Google Scholar
North, D. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change and Econonomic Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pedersen, K. M. (2005), Loven om frit sygehusvalg. In Sundhedspolitik, Odense: Syddansk Universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (2000), ‘Increasing returns, path dependence and the study of politics’, American Political Science Review, 92(4): 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollitt, C. (2002), ‘Clarifying convergence: striking similarities and durable differences in public management reform’, Public Management Review, 4(1): 471–492.Google Scholar
Pressman, J. L.Wildawsky, A. (1973), Implementation: how great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland; or, Why it's amazing that Federal programs work at all, this being a saga of the Economic Development Administration as told by two sympathetic observers who seek to build morals on a foundation of ruined hopes, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Saltman, R. B.von Otter, C. (1992), Planned Markets and Public Competition, Bristol: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Schäfer, W., Kroneman, M., Boerma, W., van den Berg, M., Westert, G., Deville, W.van Ginneken, E. (2010), ‘The Netherlands: health system review’, Health Systems in Transition, 12(1): 1–229.Google Scholar
Schippers, E. (2011), Zorg die werkt: de beleidsdoelstellingen van de minister van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport (VWS), Den Haag: Ministerie van VWS.Google Scholar
Secretaries of State for Health, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland (1989), Working for Patients, London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Socialstyrelsen. National Board of Health and Welfare (2005), Var vårdas patienten? En analys av patientströmmar mellan landstingen – studie omfattande patientregistret 1998–2002, Stockholm: Socialstyrelsen.Google Scholar
Stevens, S. (2004), ‘Reform strategies for the English NHS’, Health Affairs, 23(3): 41–44.Google Scholar
Trappenburg, M. (2008), Genoeg is genoeg. Over gezondheidszorg en democratie, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Tweede Kamer (Parliamentary Proceedings) (2006–2007), 28439 no. 98. Evaluatie Kwaliteitswet zorginstellingen (evalution quality act health care institutions).Google Scholar
Van de Bovenkamp, H. M. (2010), The Limits of Patient Power: Examining Active Citizenship in Dutch Health Care Dissertation, Rotterdam: Erasmus Universiteit.Google Scholar
Van de Bovenkamp, H., Quartz, J., Weggelaar-Jansen, A. M.Bal, R. (2011), Guiding Quality Work in European Hospitals. QUASER, Rotterdam: iMBG.Google Scholar
Van de Ven, W. P. M. M.Schut, F. T. (2008), ‘Universal mandatory health insurance in the Netherlands: a model for the United States?’, Health Affairs, 27(3): 771–781.Google Scholar
Van der Grinten, T. E. D. (2006), Zorgen om beleid: over blijvende afhankelijkheden en veranderende bestuurlijke verhoudingen in de gezondheidszorg, Rotterdam: Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Van der Kraan, W. G. M. (2006), Vraag naar vraagsturing: een verkennend onderzoek naar de betekenis van vraagsturing in de Nederlandse gezondheidszorg, Rotterdam: Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Vrangbæk, K. (1999) ‘Markedsorientering i sygehusfeltet’, PhD Dissertation, University of Copenhagen, Political Science, No. 4, København: Institut for Statskundskab, Københavns Universitet.Google Scholar
Vrangbæk, K., Stoop, A.Berg, M. (2005), ‘Theory and practice of waiting time data as a performance indicator in health care: a case study from the Netherlands’, Health Policy, 73(1): 41–51.Google Scholar
Vrangbæk, K.Beck, M. (2004), ‘County level responses to the introduction of DRG rates for “extended choice” hospital patients in Denmark’, Health Policy, 67(1): 25–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilsford, D. (1994), ‘Path dependency, or why history makes it difficult but not impossible to reform health care systems in a big way’, Journal of Public Policy, 14(3): 251–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winblad, U. (2008), ‘Do Physicians care about patient choice?’, Social Science & Medicine, 67(10): 1502–1511.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winblad, U.Ringard, A. (2009), ‘Meeting Rising Public Expectations: the Changing Role of Patients and Citizens’, in J. Magnussen, K. Vrangbæk and R. B. Saltman (eds), Nordic Health Care Systems: Recent Reforms and Current Policy Strategies, Berkshire: McGraw Hill, Open University Press, 126–150.Google Scholar
Winblad, U., Andersson, C. (2011). ‘Vilken information behöver patienter och medborgare för att välja vårdgivare och behandling? Patienters och medborgares behov av kvalitetssäkrad och lättillgänglig information’, Rapport, Institutionen för folkhälso- och vårdvetenskap, Uppsala Universitet, Uppsala.Google Scholar