Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T06:57:41.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Organizational innovations and health care decentralization: a perspective from Spain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2007

GUILLEM LÓPEZ-CASASANOVAS
GUILLEM LÓPEZ-CASASANOVAS*
Affiliation:
Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
*
*Correspondence to: Professor Guillem López-Casasanovas, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona. Jaume I Building, Ramon Trias Fargas, 25–27. 08005 Barcelona, Spain. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Recent policy developments in public health care systems lead to a greater diversity in health care. Decentralization, either geographically or at an institutional level, is the key force, because it encourages innovation and local initiatives in health care provision. The devolution of responsibilities allows for a sort of ‘deconstruction’ of the status quo by changing both organizational forms and service provision. The new organizations enjoy greater freedom in the way they pay their staff, and are judged according to the results. These organizations may retain financial surpluses, develop ‘spin-off’ companies, and commission a range of specialized services (such as Diagnostic and Treatment Centres in UK) from providers outside the institutional setting in order to have more access to capital markets. However, this diversity may generate a feeling of a lack of commitment to a national health service and ultimately a loss of social cohesion. Through fiscal decentralization to regional authorities or planned delegation of financial agreements to providers, financial incentives are more explicit and may seem to place profit making above a commitment to better health care. An evaluation of the ‘myths and realities’ of the decentralization process is needed. Here, I offer an assessment of the ‘pros’ and ‘cons’ of the health care decentralization process in Spain, drawing on the experience of regional reforms from the pioneering organizational innovations implemented in Catalonia in 1981, up to the currently observed dispersion of health care spending per capita across the regions.

Type
Perspective
Information
Health Economics, Policy and Law , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , April 2007 , pp. 223 - 232
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, P. (2002), ‘Plus ça change, plus c’est la meme chose: to the internal market and back in the British National Health Service’, Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 1 (4).Google Scholar
Atlas, V.P.M (2005), Variaciones de prácticas Médicas en el Sistema Nacional de Salud, Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud.Google Scholar
Agustí, E. et al. (2006), “Applicación de un sistema de pago basado en la población en Cataluña',” in Ibern, P.(ed.) ‘Integración asistencial: fundamentos, experiencias y vias de avance, Colección Economia de la Salud y Gestión Sanitaria, Elsevier. Masson. Barcelona.Google Scholar
Diamond, P. and Giddens, A.(2005), The New Egalitarianism, Cambridge: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Fundacion Avedis Donabedian (2003), ‘Avaluació de les noves formes de gestió en Atenció primària’, mimeo for The Catalan Health Service.Google Scholar
Gibbons, R. (1998), ‘Incentives in organizations’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(4): 115–132.Google Scholar
González López-Valcárcel, B. and Barber, P. (2006), ‘Desigualdades territoriales en el Sistema Nacional de Salud (SNS) de España’, Documento de Trabajo Fundacion Alternativas Num. 90.Google Scholar
Horn, M.J. (1995), The Political Economy of Public Administration: Institutional Choice in Public Sector, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Grand, Julian and Crilly, T. (2004), ‘The motivation and behaviour of hospital trusts’, Social Science and Medicine, 58: 1809–1823.Google Scholar
López-Casasnovas, G. and Rico, A. (2003), ‘La descentralización, ¿parte del problema sanitario de su solución?’, Gaceta Sanitaria, 4(17): 319–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopez-Casasnovas, G., Costa-Font, J.and Planas, I. (2005), ‘Diversity and regional inequalities in the Spanish system of health care services’, Health Economics, 14: s221–235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moya-Ruiz, C., Peiró, S. and Meneu, S.(2002), ‘Effectiveness of feedback to physicians in reducing inappropriate use of hospitalization’, International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 14: 305–312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ponsà, J.A.et al. (2003), ‘Avaluació de la reforma de l’atenció primària i de la diversificació de la provisió de serveis’, Annals de Medicina, 86(4).Google Scholar
Rey, P. and Rey, J. (2006), ‘La financiación sanitaria autonómica: un problema sin resolver’, Documento de Trabajo 100, Madrid Fundación Alternativas.Google Scholar
Sánchez, M. (2006), “Informe sobre la situación de la salud y los servicios sanitarios de las Comunidades Autónomas” Revista Salud 2000. Federación de Asociaciones para la Defensa de la Sanidad Pública, 109. Nov: 5–13.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. (1975), Markets and Hierarchies, New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. (1996), The Mechanisms of Governance, New York: The Free Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar