Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T02:38:27.462Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Clarifying the role of values in cost-effectiveness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2016

Michael K. Gusmano*
Affiliation:
Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
Gregory Kaebnick
Affiliation:
Hastings Centre, Garrison, NY, USA
*
*Correspondence to: Michael Gusmano, Rutgers University, 112 Paterson Street, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA. Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Debate
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Becker, G., Murphy, K. and Philipson, T. (2007), ‘The value of life near its end and terminal care’. NBER Working Paper, http://www.nber.org/papers/w13333.Google Scholar
Brown, L. D. and Gusmano, M. K. (2013), ‘Evaluation in analytic theory and political practice’, Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, 38(6): 10731081.Google Scholar
Cutler, D. M., Long, G., Berndt, E. R., Royer, J, Fournier, A., Sasser, A. and Cremieux, P. (2007), ‘The value of antihypertensive drugs: a perspective on medical innovation’, Health Affairs, 26(1): 97110.Google Scholar
Elkin, S. (1982), ‘Review: market and politics in liberal democracy’, Ethics, 92(4): 720732.Google Scholar
MacLean, D. (1998), ‘The Ethics of Cost-Benefit Analysis: Incommensurable, Incompatible, and Incomparable Values’, in M. M. Carrow, R. P. Churchill and J. J. Cores (eds), Democracy, Social Values, and Public Policy, Westport, CT: Praeger, 107122.Google Scholar
Mandel, G. N. and Gathii, T. (2006), ‘Cost-benefit analysis versus the precautionary principle: beyond Cass Sunstein’s laws of fear’, University of Illinois Law Review, 2006(5): 10371080.Google Scholar
Maschke, K. and Gusmano, M. K. (2016), ‘Politics, values, and access to untested medical interventions: the case of stem cell treatments’, Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 41(5): forthcoming.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. C. (1986), ‘Philosophical origins of the economic valuation of life’, Milbank Quarterly, 64(1): 133155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schelling, T. C. (1968), ‘The Life You Save May be Your Own’, in S. B. Chaase (ed.), Problems in Public Expenditure Analysis, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 127176.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (1970a), Collective Choice and Social Welfare, San Francisco, CA: Holden-Day.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (1970b), ‘The impossibility of a paretian liberal’, Journal of Political Economy, 78: 152157.Google Scholar
Soltan, K. E. (1987), The Causal Theory of Justice, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Stokey, E. and Zeckhauser, R. (1978), A Primer for Policy Analysis, New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Stone, D. (2011), Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Reason, 3rd edn, New York, NY: W. W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
Ubel, P. A. (2015), ‘The importance of symmetry’. JAMA, 315(2): 133134.Google Scholar
Viscusi, W. K. (1993), ‘The value of risks to life and health’, Journal of Economic Literature, 31: 19121946.Google Scholar
Viscusi, W. K. and Aldy, J. E. (2003), ‘The value of a statistical life: a critical review of market estimates throughout the world’, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 27(1): 576.Google Scholar