Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T01:10:04.354Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sculpting God: An Exchange (2)*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2011

John N. Jones
Affiliation:
Yale University

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Observations
Copyright
Copyright © President and Fellows of Harvard College 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Jones, John N., “Sculpting God: The Logic of Dionysian Negative Theology,” HTR 89 (1996) 367 n. 53.Google Scholar

2 As I mentioned in “Sculpting God” (366, n. 44), for Dionysius, one cannot “know” (in the usual sense of the term) what transcends being or does not exist. As I failed to indicate, however, the converse does not hold true; as the case of angels shows, not all beings can be known.

3 , Pseudo-Dionysius, The Divine Names 1.5, 593c.Google Scholar

4 Salvatore R. C. Lilla discusses the various uses of one example of negation–“infinitude”–in The Notion of Infinitude in Ps.-Dionysius Areopagita,” JTS 31 (1980) 93103Google Scholar.

5 This calls our attention to the importance of epistemological concerns in Christian Neoplatonist thought. See Gersh, Stephen, From Iamblichus to Eriugena: An Investigation of the Prehistory and Evolution of the Pseudo-Dionysian Tradition (Leiden: Brill, 1978), esp. pp. 261–82Google Scholar.

6 , Jones, “Sculpting God,” 356.Google Scholar