Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T17:43:12.633Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Real Meaning of Sacral Manumission

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 August 2011

F. Sokolowski
F. Sokolowski
Affiliation:
Paris
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The problem of the manumission of slaves by sale to a divinity or by consecration has been studied by many scholars. Nevertheless the following questions still arise. What real sense had the sale? What characterizes the sale and the consecration respectively? How do they bring about one's liberty? What is a fictitious or trust sale? Do the several manumission procedures of Delphi, of central Greece, of Macedonia, of Asia Minor and of Syria reflect the same customs and traditions? Cameron, after discussing a number of inscriptions of Imperial times relating to sacral manumission, puts the following question: “It would be interesting to inquire whether this conception is to be regarded as having survived continuously with the institution from an early period in Greece, or as having been revived and strengthened by new social and religious influence after remaining dormant in a period in which sacral manumission was no more than a legal fiction.” I should like to try to answer this question.

Type
Research Article
Information
Harvard Theological Review , Volume 47 , Issue 3 , July 1954 , pp. 173 - 181
Copyright
Copyright © President and Fellows of Harvard College 1954

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Cameron, A., Harv. Theol. Rev. 1939, p. 153Google Scholar.

2 W. L. Westermann: Quarterly Bulletin of the Polish Institute of Arts and Sciences in America, II, 1943, p. 10 ff.; Proc. Am. Philos. Ass. 1948, p. 55 ff.; Am. Hist. Rev. 1945, p. 213 ff.

3 Westermann, W. L., Proc. Am. Philos. Ass. 1948, p. 56Google Scholar.

4 The Greek Law of Sale, Weimar, 1950, p. 185Google Scholar.

5 Harv. Theol. Rev. 1939, p. 148–149.

6 Cardinali, Rendc. Ace. Lincei, 1908, p. 165 ff. Ramsay, Cities and Bishoprics, I, p. 135, 147–148. L. Robert: Bull. Cor. Hel. 1928, p. 419, n. 3; Rev. Phil. 1929, p. 136, n.6; 1936, p. 140. A. Cameron, Stud. Buckler, p. 41.

7 SGDI (Samml. Gr. Dial. Inschr.) 1951, 2275.

8 SGDI 2275.

9 SGDI 2073.

10 SGDI 1975, 1979, 2073.

11 Arch. Delt. 1916, p. 221, B, 58.

12 Arch. Delt. 1916, p. 264.

13 SGDI 1694.

14 SGDI 2071.

15 SGDI 1723, 2019, 2140, 2156, 2158, 2159, 2163, 2171, 2186, 2190, 2225.

16 SGDI 2049, 2072, 2073.

17 SGDI 1971.

18 SGDI 1689. Cf. Westermann, W. L., Jour. Near Eastern Stud., 1946, p. 93Google Scholar ff.

19 SGDI 1717, 1811. Cf. Daux, G., Delphes au II et I siècles, Paris 1936, p. 615–619Google Scholar, 46 ff.

20 P. Koschaker, Abh. Sächs. Ak. 1934, p. 42, 46.

21 P. Koschaker, ibid. p. 69.

22 Euripides, Supp. 267. Cf. Schlesinger, E., Die griech. Asylie, Giessen, 1933, p. 33Google Scholar ff.

23 Wilamowitz, SB Berlin 1927, p. 169. SEG IX 72, §19.

24 SB Berlin 1927, p. 169.

25 Arch. Religionswiss. 1928, p. 48.

26 Lipsius, Das Altische Recht I, p. 180; II, p. 625.

27 M. Tod, A selection of Greek Historical Inscriptions, Vol. I, 36, I, 40 ff.

28 Prott-Ziehen, LGS II, 58, 81 ff. Cf. A. Wilhelm, Jahresh. Oest. 1940, p. 57–58, Beibl.

29 W. L. Westermann, Jour. Jur. Papyr. 1948, p. 9. ff.

30 W. L. Westermann, Jour. Near Eastern Stud. 1946, p. 94 ff.

31 Inscr. Cret. II, Dictynna, 3, 12.

32 SGDI I, 425. Cf. Inscr. Jur. Gr. II, p. 238.

33 A. Plassart, Mélanges Holleaux, p. 209. A. Calderini, La manumissione, p. 419–420.

34 Arch. Delt. 1916, p. 264, 1. 72 ff.

35 Westermann, W. L., Jour. Near Eastern Stud. 1946, p. 93Google Scholar.

36 Harv. Theol. Rev. 1939, p. 147, 149.

37 Monumenta Asiae Minoris Antiqua IV, 275 ff.

38 Cf. Zeitschr. Savigny-Stift., R. Abt., 1921, p. 175 ff.

39 Cf. Steinleitner, Die Beicht, p. 47, n.22; p. 52, n.25; p. 57, n.27; p. 59, n.32; p. 87, n.1.

40 Harv. Theol. Rev. 1939, p. 161 ff.