Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T16:24:18.296Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Paulsen on Augustine: An Incorporeal or Nonanthropomorphic God?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2011

Kim Paffenroth
Kim Paffenroth
Affiliation:
University of Notre Dame
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes & Observations
Information
Harvard Theological Review , Volume 86 , Issue 2 , April 1993 , pp. 233 - 235
Copyright
Copyright © President and Fellows of Harvard College 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Paulsen, David L., “Early Christian Belief in a Corporeal Deity: Origen and Augustine as Reluctant Witnesses,” HTR 83 (1990) 105–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Ibid., 105.

3 In addition to these theoretical errors, there are the practical shortcomings of Paulsen's use of the Pusey translation of Augustine, more than one hundred and fifty years old, and of not citing quotations from Augustine with the standard book and section numbers.

4 Paulsen, “Corporeal Deity,” 114.

5 Augustine Confessions (trans. Ryan, John K.; Garden City: Doubleday, 1960)Google Scholar 5.20 (pp. 127–28); my emphasis.

6 Ibid., 3.12 (p. 85).

7 Ibid., 5.20 (p. 128).

8 Ibid., 5.19 (p. 127).

9 See Watson, Gerard, Saint Augustine. Soliloquies and Immortality of the Soul (Warminster: Aris & Phillips, 1990) 12Google Scholar: “He [Augustine] had been told as a child that God was a spirit and therefore did not act as we with our bodies act…. Was there any reality other than body of some sort? It seemed the more honest course to go along with the Manichaean view that God i s in some sense a body composed of fine and luminous matter.… It seemed to him more honest to think that ‘anything not a body is nothing whatsoever.’ This was the position which the Stoics and Epicureans had felt themselves forced to take against the ‘spiritualism’ of Plato and Aristotle six hundred years before.”