Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T11:39:20.250Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

NoγaemiΘ—A Note on “An Arabian Trinity”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2011

G. W. Bowersock
Affiliation:
Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Observations
Copyright
Copyright © President and Fellows of Harvard College 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The papyrus actually shows , but Littmann, E.apud F. Preisigke, Namenbuch (1922), col. 512 notes that this should be read as Νοαιμαθ (= Nuʿaimat).Google Scholar

2 Cantineau, J., Le nabatéen I (1930) 4849Google Scholar. When ay does not constitute a diphthong, αε in Greek is possible: e.g., ʿyd produces ’Ἀεδος,, Wuthnow, H., Die semitischen Menschennamen in griechischen Inschriften und Papyri des vorderen Orients (1930)Google Scholar 13. Cf. Arabic ʿâʿ idha. See also Cantineau, , Le nabatéen II (1932) 129.Google Scholar

3 This postscript gives me an opportunity also to rectify my error in referring to Dominique Sourdel by a feminine pronoun. I was misled by his ambiguous prénom but now know better.