Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T12:24:49.852Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gibbon and the Clergy: Private Virtues, Public Vices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2011

Myron C. Noonkester
Myron C. Noonkester
Affiliation:
William Carey College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

When the inaugural volume of Edward Gibbon's Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire was published in February 1776, the English public greeted it with a mixture of veneration and anxiety. Many agreed that it was a classic work, but some critics, mostly clergy, questioned its treatment of Christianity. Scholars have approached the ensuing controversy from several angles: Gibbon's reticence reduced it, theologically speaking, to a sampling of doctrinal viewpoints; considered as a literary phenomenon, the controversy merely provoked Gibbon to relegate his opponents to literary oblivion; historiographically, it affirmed the subordination of religious to civil history and the application of philosophical principles to the study of early Christianity. Though each is valid, none of these approaches accounts sufficiently for the historical context in which the controversy occurred. Yet an appreciation of the historical context of the controversy is necessary if Gibbon's achievement and eighteenth-century England's perspective on the problem of Christian origins are to be understood. This article observes Gibbon as he perfected his approach to religion, pondered the criticisms of his opponents, and sought to vindicate himself. In contrast to previous appraisals, it emphasizes that Gibbon was an occasional polemicist, that the controversy affected him deeply, and that, judged by contemporary standards, his critics successfully exploited their advantages in the debate.

Type
Research Article
Information
Harvard Theological Review , Volume 83 , Issue 4 , October 1990 , pp. 399 - 414
Copyright
Copyright © President and Fellows of Harvard College 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Walpole, Horace, The Yale Edition of Horace Walpole's Correspondence (ed. Lewis, W. S., et al; 42 vols.; New Haven: Yale University Press, 1955) 28. 243Google Scholar. See also the index heading “Religion” in Craddock's, Patriciaindispensable Edward Gibbon: A Reference Guide (Boston: G. K. Hall, 1987) 472Google Scholar and the sources cited therein.

2 For the most recent and satisfying accounts see Craddock, Patricia, Edward Gibbon, Luminous Historian, 1772-1794 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989) 122–31Google Scholar; and Womersley, David, The Transformation of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988) esp. chap. 8Google Scholar.

3 McCloy, Shelby T., Gibbon's Antagonism to Christianity (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1933)Google Scholar.

4 Low, D. M., Edward Gibbon, 1737-1794 (New York: Random House, 1937) 263Google Scholar; and Norton, J. E., ed., A Bibliography of the Works of Edward Gibbon (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1940) 79Google Scholar.

5 Trevor-Roper, Hugh, “The Historical Philosophy of the Enlightenment,” in Besterman, T., ed., Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century (Geneva: Institut et Musée Voltaire, 1963) 27. 1667–87Google Scholar; Bowersock, Glen W., Clive, John, and Graubard, Stephen R., eds., “Edward Gibbon and the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire,” Daedalus 105 (1976) 1–251Google Scholar; and Jordan, David, Gibbon and His Roman Empire (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1971)Google Scholar.

6 Lionel Gossman has recently suggested the need for such an approach in a review in the Journal of Modern History 62 (1990) 131–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Sheffield, John Lord, ed., The Miscellaneous Works of Edward Gibbon (3 vols.; Dublin: P. Wogan, 1796) 1. 43Google Scholar.

8 Taylor, Henry (Thoughts on the Nature of the Grand Apostacy [London: J. Johnson, 1781] x)Google Scholar described Gibbon's approach as “nothing more than an innocent confusion of ideas and errors of judgment arising from the chaos of a heated imagination or perhaps too much learning.”

9 Gibbon's flirtation with Catholicism resembles the experience of Tindal, Toland, and Pope. See Clark, J. C. D., English Society, 1688-1832 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985) 280Google Scholar; and Loftus, Smyth, A Reply to the Reasonings of Mr. Gibbon (London: Williams and Bew, 1778) 115:Google Scholar “This is not the only instance in which I have found Deists favourable to popery.”

10 The title of the most recent analysis is suggestive: Parish, Richard, Pascal's Lettres Provinciates: A Study in Polemic (Oxford: Clarendon, 1989).Google ScholarGibbon, (Miscellaneous Works, 67)Google Scholar read Pascal once a year.

11 Evans, A. W., Warburton and the Warburtonians (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1932) 59, 275Google Scholar; Gibbon, , Miscellaneous Works, 3. 284–85Google Scholar.

12 Hurd's reply is in Gibbon, , Miscellaneous Works, 1. 454–65Google Scholar. It includes a fragment of a rejoinder in Gibbon's hand. See also The Works of Richard Hurd, D. D. (8 vols.; London: T. Cadell and W. Davies, 1811) 5. 363–402Google Scholar.

13 Norton, J. E., ed., The Letters of Edward Gibbon (3 vols.; New York: Macmillan, 1956), 1. 351Google Scholar; 2. 13, 16, 140. He also employed this approach in the Decline and Fall. “Is this word profane in jest or in earnest? Why does he deal in such ambiguous modes of speech? Why abuse the gift of language, whose principle [sic] end is, to lay open, not to disguise, the sentiments of the soul?” (Milner, Joseph, Gibbon's Account of Christianity Considered [York: A. Ward, 1781] 17)Google Scholar.

14 Believer, A, “Remarks on Mr. Gibbon's Two Last Chapters,” Gentleman's Magazine 46 (10 1776) 441Google Scholar; “Articles of Intelligence,” Theological Miscellany 1 (1784) 142–43Google Scholar(as cited in Craddock, , Reference, 36)Google Scholar.

15 Womersley, , Transformation of Decline and Fall, chap. 8Google Scholar; Norton, , Letters, 2. 81Google Scholar.

16 Craddock, Patricia, Young Edward Gibbon: Gentleman of Letters, 1737-1772 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1982) 1Google Scholar.

17 On Gibbon's Jacobite background, see Low, , Edward Gibbon, 10.11.27. 28Google Scholar; and Craddock, , Young Edward Gibbon, 28, 46Google Scholar.

18 Gibbon, Edward, The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire (ed. Smeaton, Oliphant; 6 vols.; London: Everyman's Library, 1910) 1. 31Google Scholar. His comments on Cicero are ironic in light of his later predicament.

19 Norton, , Letters, 2. 100.Google ScholarClark, J. C. D. (English Society, 189)Google Scholar suggests that Gibbon was “born and educated in one political universe… [but] survived into another.” Craddock, (Luminous Historian, 70–73)Google Scholar expertly analyzes the chronology of Gibbon's realization of the extent of the problem. She suggests that only in June did he realize that there would be printed attacks.

20 Norton, , Letters, 2. 121-24, 141Google Scholar.

21 For reasons of context and manageability, this investigation is limited to British works published prior to 1788. For the intellectual environment that Gibbon's work entered see Hudson, Nicholas, Samuel Johnson and Eighteenth Century Thought (Oxford: Clarendon, 1988) esp. chaps. 1, 2, 7Google Scholar.

22 Gentleman's Magazine 46 (12 1776) 562Google Scholar. On the critical reaction, see Craddock, , Luminous Historian, 70–71Google Scholar.

23 Hayley, William, An Essay on History in Three Epistles to Edward Gibbon (London: J. Dodsley, 1780) 79:Google Scholar “Think not my verse means blindly to engage / In rash defence of thy profaner page /… She breathes an honest sigh of deep concern/ and pities Genius, when his wild career / Gives faith a wound or innocence a fear.”

24 Loftus, , A Reply, 71Google Scholar.

25 Chelsum, James, Remarks on the Last Two Chapters of Mr. Gibbon's History (Oxford: Clarendon, 1778) xiiGoogle Scholar.

26 Norton, , Letters, 2. 172Google Scholar.

27 Gibbon, , Miscellaneous Works, 1. 154, 155Google Scholar; Dalrymple, David, An Inquiry into the Secondary Causes Which Mr. Gibbon Has Assignedfor the Rapid Growth of Christianity (Edinburgh: Murray and Cochrane, 1786) esp. 14, 26, 30, 31Google Scholar. Gibbon commented, in a typical instance of social determinism, that Dalrymple, a jurist, was guilty of special pleading.

28 Modern scholarship anachronistically discounts the alien qualities of these authors.

29 See Clark, , English Society, 279–329Google Scholar.

30 Cf. Taylor, , Thoughts, 71Google Scholar; and Loftus, , A Reply, 197Google Scholar.

31 Gibbon, , Miscellaneous Works, 1. 108Google Scholar. The same may perhaps be said concerning his remarks about Oxford, which seek to mitigate the circumstances of his conversion.

32 Ibid., 1. 31-43.

33 Loftus, , A Reply, 234Google Scholar; and Chelsum, , Remarks, xiv, xv:Google Scholar “It has necessarily been rendered incapable of the mornaments of stile; and it has been his duty to attend rather to matter than to words.”

34 Monthly Review 55 (07 1776) 44Google Scholar.

35 Mossner, Ernest Campbell and Ross, Ian Simpson, eds., The Correspondence of Adam Smith (Oxford: Clarendon, 1977) 189Google Scholar; Annual Register of World Events 19 (1776) 237Google Scholar(as cited in Craddock, , Reference, 4–5)Google Scholar.

36 Womersley, , Transformation, 109Google Scholar.

37 Taylor, , Thoughts, iGoogle Scholar. This criticism complemented criticisms of the Frenchness of Gibbon's style: Monthly Review 64 (03 1781) 224Google Scholar and (June 1781) 448; C, B., “Strictures on the Style of Mr. Gibbon,” Gentleman's Magazine 56 (11 1786) 919Google Scholar.

38 McCloy, , Gibbon's Antagonism, 164Google Scholar.

39 Milner, , Gibbon's Account, 3Google Scholar.

40 Chelsum, , Remarks, xi, xiiGoogle Scholar. See also Loftus, , A Reply, 2Google Scholar.

41 Taylor, , Thoughts, 43, 44, 70Google Scholar. “You have laboured to raise a sneer, where you durst not risk an argument” (Travis, George, Letters to Edward Gibbon, esq. [2d ed.; London: C. F. and J. Rivington, 1785] 351–52). On the “test of ridicule” seeGoogle ScholarHudson, , Samuel Johnson, 29–33Google Scholar.

42 Chelsum, , Remarks, xiii.Google ScholarVindex, , “Testimonials for G. M.,” Gentleman's Magazine 54 (11 1784) 565Google Scholar.

43 Boswell, James, The Life of Johnson (ed. Hill, G. B; rev. L. F. Powell; 6 vols.; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1934-1950) 2. 9Google Scholar.

44 Davis, H. E., An Examination of the Fifteenth and Sixteenth Chapters of Mr. Gibbon's History (London: J. Dodsley, 1778) 1–284Google Scholar. That is what several of Gibbon's critics desired. Apthorp, East, Letters on the Prevalence of Christianity (London: J. Robson, 1778) 15, 16, 64, 65Google Scholar. Chelsum, James (A Reply to Mr. Gibbon's Vindication [Winchester: Robbins and Gilmour, 1785] 131, 132)Google Scholar assumes a tradeoff between embellishment and truth.

45 Norton, , Letters, 1. 14-23, 25-34, 37-56, 58–68Google Scholar.

46 Monthly Review 59 (09 1778) 199Google Scholar.

47 Duncombe, John, Select Works of the Emperor Julian (2 vols.; London: J. Nichols for T. Cadell, 1784) 1. xxxivGoogle Scholar.

48 “Further Character of Mr. Davis,” Gentleman's Magazine 54 (07 1784) 516Google Scholar.

49 “Mr. Gibbon Vindicated against Mr. Davis,” Gentleman's Magazine 54 (Suppl.) 968–69Google Scholar.

50 Chelsum, , Remarks, iv-10, 67-106, 232Google Scholar; Milner, , Gibbon's Account, 20Google Scholar; and Apthorp, , Letters, 191, 194:Google Scholar “We know, my friend, from whose quiver this shaft is borrowed.”

51 Apthorp, , Letters, 194–99Google Scholar; Carnochan, W. B., Gibbon's Solitude (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1987) 79, 80, 203nGoogle Scholar; Chelsum, , Remarks, 13–31Google Scholar.

52 Milner, , Gibbon's Account, 34. It is ironic that Gibbon's modern admirers have assumed that he did not attack “real” ChristianityGoogle Scholar.

53 Chelsum, , Reply, 14, 72, 106Google Scholar.

54 Chelsum, , Reply, 20-23, 62–67Google Scholar; Davis, H. E. and Chelsum, James, “Misrepresentations of Mr. Gibbon Exposed,” Gentleman's Magazine 52 (04 1782) 181Google Scholar. Richard Porson agreed. See “Strictures on Mr. Travis,” Gentleman's Magazine 58 (10 1788) 875Google Scholar.

55 Chelsum, , Reply, 53, 54Google Scholar; Dalrymple, , An Inquiry, 30, 31Google Scholar.

56 Watson, Richard, An Apology for Christianity (Cambridge: J. Archdeacon, 1776) chaps. 1–5Google Scholar; Apthorp, (Letters, 351)Google Scholar doubts that any religious establishment can be changed by human means.

57 Milner, , Gibbon's Account, 52, 53Google Scholar.

58 Taylor, , Thoughts, 78, 121Google Scholar; Dalrymple, , An Inquiry, 14, 26, 30, 31Google Scholar. Priestley, Joseph, An History of the Corruptions of Christianity (2 vols.; Birmingham: Piercey and Jones for J. Johnson, 1782) 2. 444Google Scholar; Loftus, , A Reply, 99–100Google Scholar.

59 Norton, , Letters, 2. 120Google Scholar.

60 Loftus, , A Reply, 2–3Google Scholar; Hayley, , An Essay, 158nGoogle Scholar; Critical Review 42 (12 1776) 465Google Scholar.

61 See Low, , Gibbon, 230–31Google Scholar; and Boswell, , The Life of Johnson, 2. 447–48Google Scholar.

62 Norton, , Letters, 2. 48Google Scholar.

63 Ibid., 3. 118, 216.

64 Gibbon, , Miscellaneous Works, 2. 28Google Scholar.

65 Ibid., 3. 313-91.

66 Gossman, Lionel, The Empire Unpossess'd (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981) 117Google Scholar.

67 Norton, , Letters, 2. 203Google Scholar.

68 Milner, , Gibbon's Account, viGoogle Scholar.

69 Chelsum, (Reply, 30)Google Scholar replied that though he was wrong about Suidas, that did not materially affect the point he was making against Middleton.

70 Priestley, Joseph, Letters to a Philosophical Unbeliever (Birmingham: Pearson and Hollason, 1787) 199Google Scholar; Norton, , Letters, 2. 320–23Google Scholar; Gibbon, , Miscellaneous Works, 2. 96–103Google Scholar.

71 Norton, , Letters, 2. 129, 261, 294, 295Google Scholar.

72 Gibbon, , Miscellaneous Works, 2. 84Google Scholar.

73 Critical Review 51 (03 1781) 169Google ScholarPubMed.

74 Norton, , Letters, 2. 266Google Scholar.

75 Ibid., 3. 100.

76 Gibbon (ibid., 2. 259) jokingly referred to himself as the “profane historian.”

77 Gibbon, , Miscellaneous Works, 1. 153–56Google Scholar.

78 Newman, John Henry, Essays and Sketches (3 vols.; London: Longmans, Green, 1948) 2. 217Google Scholar; Gibbon, Edward, The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire (5 vols.; ed. Milman, H. H.; New York: Thomas Y. Crowell, 1845) 1. 508nGoogle Scholar.

79 “Directions in the Reading of History,” European Magazine and London Review 14 (07 1788) 7Google Scholar(as cited in Craddock, , Reference, 46)Google Scholar.

80 “Review of The Decline and Fall, Vols. 4-6,” Critical Review 66 (07 1788) 35Google Scholar.

81 Milner, , Gibbon's Account, viiiGoogle Scholar. Cf. William Disney's sermon cited in McCloy, , Gibbon's Antagonism, 149, 150Google Scholar.

82 Monthly Review 64 (04 1781) 294Google Scholar.

83 Monthly Review 64 (04 1781) 448Google Scholar; Carnochan, , Gibbon's Solitude, 112Google Scholar; Gibbon, , Miscellaneous Works, 2. 83Google Scholar.

84 Gibbon, , Decline and Fall, 6. 546.Google ScholarCarnochan, (Gibbon's Solitude, 82)Google Scholar calls this “negotiation.”

85 Gibbon, , Decline and Fall, 1. 431Google Scholar.

86 Ibid., 1. 101.

87 Treveleyan, G. O., The Life and Letters of Lord Macaulay (2 vols.; London: Longmans, Green, 1876) 2. 284–85Google Scholar.

88 Hayley, , An Essay, 79Google Scholar; Monthly Review 68 (06 1783) 488Google Scholar.

89 Gibbon, , Miscellaneous Works, 1. 153Google Scholar.