Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:51:08.914Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Evil One: A Development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2011

John Edwards Le Bosquet
Affiliation:
Boulder, Colorado

Extract

It is proposed in this paper to consider, largely from the standpoint of the philosophy of religion, one religious idea: the idea of a power or powers of evil, or, to grasp the whole in one symbol, the idea of the Evil One. Such a discussion should have its interest. The idea of the Evil One, or the Devil as we commonly call him, is perfectly familiar to the average person. There is no need therefore of any elaborate definings. One has only to note that by the Evil One is meant that force or power which is constitutionally—on principle, one might say, if that phrase did not seem a bit out of place—the champion and fosterer of chaos and discord and calamity, of evil and harm and wickedness in general. Or, to put it negatively,—as we perhaps more often think of it,—the Devil is the leader of the opposition as regards the hopeful, the progressive, the divine, with all the meaning which may be packed into that last word.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © President and Fellows of Harvard College 1912

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For this sketch of Zoroastrianism I am largely indebted to E. Lehmann, in Chantepie de la Saussaye, Religionsgeschichte, 3d edition.

2 See Gunkel, Genesis, 2d edition, pp. 17–19.

3 Bousset, Die Religion des Judenthums im neutestamentlichen Zeitalter, p. 331.

4 1 Corinthians 10 20, 21, cf. 1 Timothy 4 1.

5 1 13, 14.

6 Because this type of philosophy is less known than it should be among theologians, let me quote here from Professor Perry, himself a realist, in his book, Present Philosophical Tendencies, p. 329. “Realism … rejects the doctrine that things must be good. … The universe, or collective totality of being, contains things good, bad, and indifferent. … It is the practical function of intelligence, not to read goodness into the facts, but to lay bare the facts in all their indifference and brutality.”