Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T15:34:12.023Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Contributions of Martin Bucer to the Reformation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2011

Hastings Eells
Hastings Eells
Affiliation:
Ohio Wesleyan University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is a common fallacy to regard great movements in history as the work of one great prophet, to think that he alone changed the current of human events by the force of a single dynamic personality. As a matter of fact, great movements, such as the Reformation, have been produced because an unusually large number of prophets arose at the same time. Though the names of only a few have been illumined by fame, the deeds of the rest were just as necessary for the success of the movement.

Type
Research Article
Information
Harvard Theological Review , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , January 1931 , pp. 29 - 42
Copyright
Copyright © President and Fellows of Harvard College 1931

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 A. Erichson, Martin Butzer, Strasbourg, 1891, p. 1.

2 Ibid.

3 M. Bucer, Verantwortung, Strasbourg, 1528, p. aiij; J. W. Baum, Capito und Butzer, Elberfeld, 1860, p. 90.

4 Bucer, Verantwortung, aiij ff.

5 Ibid.; Toepke, G., Die Matrikel der Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, 1884 ff., p. 509Google Scholar.

6 Baum, 94.

7 Horawitz, A. and Hartfelder, K., Briefwechsel des Beatus Rhenanus, Leipzig, 1886, p. 106Google Scholar.

8 Stähelin, R., Briefe aus der Reformationszeit, Basel, 1887, p. 20Google Scholar.

9 Thesaurus Baumianus (a manuscript collection in the Bibliothèque universitaire et régionale de Strasbourg) I, 144; Bucer, Verantwortung, b, e; Stähelin, 13; Baum, 120; G. Anrich, Martin Bucer, Strasbourg, 1914, p. 11.

10 Corpus Reformatorum: Ulrich Zwinglis Werke, 1904 ff., VIII, 81.

11 Baum, A., Magistrat und Reformation in Strassburg bis 1529, Strasbourg, 1887, pp. 29 ffGoogle Scholar.

12 Ibid. 79–80.

13 Anrich, 104.

14 Cf. Anrich, 36–37; Gerbert, C., Geschichte der Strassburger Sectenbewegung zur Zeit der Reformation 1524–1534, Strasbourg, 1889, p. xGoogle Scholar.

15 Schiess, T., Briefwechsel der Brüder Ambrosius und Thomas Blaurer 1509–1568, Freiburg i. Br. 1908 ff., I, 553Google Scholar; Thesaurus Baumianus, XII, 129–132.

16 Rōhrich, T. W., Mittheilungen aus der Geschichte der evangelischen Kirche des Elsasses, Strasbourg, 1855, I, 187 ffGoogle Scholar.

17 Erichson, A., Die Calvinische und die Altstrassburgische Gottesdienstordnung, Strasbourg, 1894, pp. 12, 29Google Scholar; Reu, J. M., Quellen zur Geschichte des kirchlichen Unterrichts, Gütersloh, 1904, I, part I, 23, 67, 90Google Scholar.

18 Erichson, 7–9.

19 Schmidt, C., La Vie et les Travaux de Jean Sturm, Strasbourg, 1855, p. 32Google Scholar.

20 Thesaurus Baumianus, II, 213.

21 Ibid.

22 Mentz, F., Bibliographische Zusammenstellung der gedruckten Schriften Butzer's, Strasbourg, 1891, nos. 12, 14, 20Google Scholar.

23 H. Eells, ‘The Genesis of Martin Bucer's Doctrine of the Lord's Supper,’ Princeton Theological Review, XXIV, 232 ff.

24 Ibid. 242 ff.

25 Ibid.

26 Corpus Reformatorum: Melanchthonis Opera, 1854 ff., 11, 109.

27 M. Bucer, Scripta Anglicana, Basel, 1577, p. 613.

28 Ibid. 642

29 Ibid. 611.

30 Ibid. 621

31 Ibid. 636.

32 Ibid. 617

33 Ibid. 637.

34 Ibid. 639.

35 Ibid. 666.

36 Ibid. 640.

37 Ibid.

38 Ibid. 614.

39 Ibid. 703.

40 Ibid. 704.

41 Ibid. 617.

42 Ibid. 701.

43 Ibid. 643, 674, 660.

44 Ibid. 665.

45 Virck, H., Winckelmann, O., and Bernays, J., Politische Correspondenz der Stadt Strassburg im Zeitalter der Reformation, Strasbourg, 1882 ff., I, 504, 512 ffGoogle Scholar.

46 Enders, E. L., Dr. Martin Luther's Briefwechsel, Kalw and Stuttgart, 1884 ff., X, 237–238Google Scholar.

47 Bucer, Scripta Anglicana, 649–651; Walch, J. G., Dr. Martin Luthers Sämmtliche Schriften, St. Louis, 1901, XVII, 2093Google Scholar.

48 Bucer, Scripta Anglicana, 653; Walch, XVII, 2095–2097, 2110.

49 Schiess, II, 88.

50 E. Arbenz and H. Wartmann, Die Vadianische Briefsammlung der Stadtbibliothek St. Gallen (Mittheilungen zur vaterländischen Geschichte), VII, 75–78; Original Letters Relative to the English Reformation, Cambridge, 1846, II, 524–525Google Scholar.

51 Walch, XVII, 308.

52 Bucer, M., Etliche gesprech vom Nürnbergischen fridestand, Strasbourg, 1539, see pp. Aii, Biii, C, CiiiGoogle Scholar; Eii, F, Mii, Oiii; Lenz, M., Briefwechsel Landgraf Philipp's des Grossmüthigen von Hessen mit Bucer, Leipzig, 1880 ff., I, 68–78, 90–93Google Scholar.

53 M. Bucer, Vom tag zu Hagenaw, 1548; Hering, C. W., Geschichte der kirchlichen Unionsversuche seit der Reformation bis auf unsere Zeit, Leipzig, 1836, p. 41Google Scholar.

54 M. Bucer, Von den einigen rechten wege, 1545, p. 87; Lenz, I, 189; Arbenz and Wartmann, v, 633.

55 Bucer, Von den einigen, 56–62; W. V. Gulick, Johannes Gropper, 1906, pp. 68–69.

56 H. Eells, “The Origin of the Regensburg Book,’ Princeton Theological Review, XXVI, 363–366.

57 E. Doumergue, Jean Calvin, Lausanne, 1899 ff., II, 617–619; Blatter, A., Die Thätigkeit Melanchthons bei den Unionsversuehen 1539–1541, Bern, 1899, p. 54Google Scholar; Bucer, Von den einigen, 39; Corpus Reformatorum, IV, 86–88.

58 Lenz, III, 18–19; M. Bucer, Alle Handlungen, 1541, p. 26.

59 Corpus Reformatorum, IV, 253, 547; P. Vetter, Die Religionsverhandlungen auf dem Reichstage zu Regensburg, 1541, 1889, p. 1.

60 H. Eells, ‘The Origin of the Regensburg Book,’ Princeton Theological Review, XXVI, 363 ff.

61 Brieger, T., De Formulae Concordiae Ratisbonensis origine atque indole, Halle, 1870, pp. 16 ff., 65Google Scholar; J. Eck, Apologia, Cologne, 1542, p. eiii.

62 Cf. M. Bucer, Abusum ecclesiasticorum, Strasbourg, 1541.

63 Cf. Hering, 120.

64 Lenz, I, 189; Thesaurus Baumianus, XIII, 136; Schiess, II, 104, 124; Corpus Reformatorum; Calvini Opera Omnia, 1866 ff., XI, 456.

65 Varrentrapp, C., Hermann von Wied und sein Reformationsversuch in Köln, Leipzig, 1878, pp. 51, 131–133Google Scholar; Gulick, 87–89, 92.

66 Gulick, 92.

67 Varrentrapp, 142–143.

68 M. Bucer, Was in Namen zu Bonn, 1543; M. Bucer, Die ander verteydigung, 1543; K. and Krafft, W., Briefe und Documente aus der Zeit der Reformation im 16. Jahrhundert, Elberfeld, 1873, pp. 56, 59Google Scholar.

69 Krafft, 56, 59; Bucer, Die ander verteydigung, preface; Virck, Winckelmann, and Bernays, III, 408.

70 Lenz, II, 121 ff.; Raynaldus, Annales Ecclesiastici, XXXIII, Lucca, 1755, xxi ff.; J. Sleidan, De Statu Religionis et Reipublicae Carolo Quinto Caesare Commentarii, 1557, p. 245.

71 Lenz, II, 121–125, 128, 130, 138, 145, 147; Thesaurus Baumianus, XIII, 160; XIV, 24; Corpus Reformatorum, V, 100; Krafft, 64; Varrentrapp, 157.

72 Thesaurus Baumianus, XIII, 149; Krafft, 88; Corpus Reformatorum, V, 113; Varrentrapp, 176; M. Bucer, Von Gottes Gnaden … bedenken, 1543; Jacobs, H. E., The Lutheran Movement in England, Philadelphia, 1890, p. 227Google Scholar.

73 Corpus Reformatorum, V, 113; Krafft, 80.

74 Varrentrapp, 205–208.

75 Cf. Schiess, II, 112,117,160 ff., 206–207; Corpus Reformatorum, V, 103; Thesaurus Baumianus, XIV, 87, 110, 115.

76 M. Bucer, Ein warhaffter berichte vom Colloquio zu Regenspurg, Strasbourg, 1546; M. Bucer, Disputata Eatisbonae, 1548; F. Roth, ‘Der offizielle Bericht von den Evangelischen zum Regensburger Gespräch Verordneten,’ Archiv für Reformationsgeschichte, V, 1.

77 Schiess, II, 702; Anrich, 108.

78 Schiess, II, 702, 703, 720, 735; Calvini Opera, XIII, 5, 49.

79 Calvini Opera, XIII, 197–199; Erichson, 63; Original Letters, II, 538.

80 Calvini Opera, XIII, 355.

81 A. E. Harvey, Martin Bucer in England, Marburg, 1906.

82 Bucer, Scripta Anglicana, 456–503, 681–683, 705–710, 862; Original Letters, II, 544; Harvey, 131–134, 141–159.

83 Cf. Burnet, G., The History of the Reformation of the Church of England, New York, 1843, II, 248Google Scholar.

84 Thesaurus Baumianus, XX, 179; Harvey, 29 and n. 1, 110, 122; Original Letters, H, 543 ff.; Corpus Reformatorum, VII, 732; Calvini Opera, XIII, 355.

85 Harvey, 91 and n. 4.

86 Cf. above, note 82.

87 Bucer, Scripta Anglicana, 456–503.

88 Calvini Opera, XIII, 357.

89 Bucer, Scripta Anglicana, 915–933.

90 Ibid. 935–936.

91 Cf. Milton, J., The Prose Works of John Milton, London, 1848, IH, 274Google Scholar; T. M. Lindsay, ‘Martin Bucer and the Reformation,’ Quarterly Review, vol. 220, p. 116.

92 J. Sturm, Erinnerungsschrift, Neustatt a.H., 1581, p. 35; Büchsenschütz, L., Histoire des Liturgies en Langue allemande dans l’Église de Strasbourg au XVIe Siècle, Paris, 1900, p. 114Google Scholar.

93 Cf. facsimile in Mentz, G., Handscriften der Reformationszeit, Bonn, 1912, Table 23bGoogle Scholar.