^{page 220 note 1} The Religious Aspect of Philosophy, p. v.

^{page 220 note 2} Ibid., p. 5.

^{page 220 note 3} Ibid., p. 18. The quotations are from the First Edition.

^{page 221 note 1} Ibid., p. 431.

^{page 221 note 2} Ibid., p. 434.

^{page 222 note 1} The Conception of God, p. 44.

^{page 222 note 2} Ibid., p. 43.

^{page 222 note 3} Ibid., p. 49.

^{page 222 note 4} Ibid., p. 50.

^{page 223 note 1} Ibid., p. 123.

^{page 223 note 2} Ibid., p. 137.

^{page 223 note 3} Ibid., p. 272.

^{page 223 note 4} Ibid., p. 292.

^{page 226 note 1} Vol. II, p. 418.

^{page 229 note 1} Loyalty represents the will side of love; love includes both spontaneous and volitional elements.

^{page 230 note 1} Op. cit., p. 192.

^{page 231 note 1} II, p. 51.

^{page 231 note 2} I, p. 54.

^{page 231 note 3} July, 1914.

^{page 232 note 1} I, p. 352.

^{page 232 note 2} It is unfortunate that, as Professor George F. Moore has pointed out to the writer, the term immanence, in its exact derivative sense, precludes transcendence. That which remains in a thing obviously cannot transcend it. Yet what can the theologian do in such a case but assert that meanings transcend terms?