Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:30:13.684Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Clement of Alexandria and Secret Mark: The Score at the End of the First Decade

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2011

Morton Smith
Morton Smith
Affiliation:
Columbia University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Late Spring of 1982 will see the tenth anniversary of the full publication of Clement's letter and its gospel fragments. Accordingly, this seems an appropriate occasion to review the discussion of them to date. The following review is based on about 150 published items that have come to my attention. No doubt some have been missed, but I trust these are representative.

Type
Research Article
Information
Harvard Theological Review , Volume 75 , Issue 4 , October 1982 , pp. 449 - 461
Copyright
Copyright © President and Fellows of Harvard College 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Achtemeier, P., review, JBL 93 (1974) 625–28.Google Scholar
Beardslee, W., review, Int 28 (1974) 234–36.Google Scholar
H. D. Betz, response to Fuller, see Fuller.Google Scholar
Brown, R., “The Relation of ‘The Secret Gospel of Mark’ to the Fourth Gospel”, CBQ 36 (1974) 466–85.Google Scholar
Bruce, F., The ‘Secret’ Gospel of Mark (E. Wood Lecture 1974) London: Athlone Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Donfried, K., “New-Found Fragments of an Early Gospel”, Christian Century 90 (1973) 759–60.Google Scholar
Fitzmyer, J., “How to Exploit a Secret Gospel”, America 128 (1973) 570–72. See my reply and his, printed by the editors of America under the title, “Mark's ‘Secret Gospel’?”, 129 (1973) 64–65.Google Scholar
Frend, W., “A New Jesus?” New York Review of Books 20 (9 Aug 1973) 34–35.Google Scholar
Fuller, R., Longer Mark: Forgery, Interpolation, or Old Tradition? (Center for Hermeneutical Studies, Colloquy 18) ed. luellner, W.; Berkeley: Center for Hermeneutical Studies, 1975. This contains responses by a dozen scholars, of which some are mere notes, but the following deserve notice: H. D. Betz, 17–18; E. Hobbs, 19–25; S. Johnson, 26–28; H. Koester 29–32; A. Kolenkow, 33–34; C. Murgia, 35–40; D. Schmidt, 41–45; M. Shepherd, 46–52; M. Smith, 12–15.Google Scholar
Grant, R., “Morton Smith's Two Books”, ATR 56 (1974) 58–65.Google Scholar
Hanson, R., Review, JTS 25 (1974) 513–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
E. Hobbs, response to Fuller (see Fuller).Google Scholar
van der Horst, P., “Het ‘Geheime Markusevangelie’”, NedThTs 33 (1979), 27–51.Google Scholar
Johnson, S., “The Mystery of St. Mark”, History Today 25 (1975) 89–97.Google Scholar
S. Johnson, response to Fuller (see Fuller).Google Scholar
Kee, H., review, JAAR 43 (1975) 326–29.Google Scholar
Koester, H., review, AHR 80 (1975) 620–22.Google Scholar
H. Koester, response to Fuller (see Fuller).Google Scholar
A. Kolenkow, response to Fuller (see Fuller).Google Scholar
Kümmel, W.“Ein Jahrzent Jesusforschung (1965–1975)”, ThR n.s. 40 (1975) 298–303.Google Scholar
MacRae, G., “Yet Another Jesus”, Commonweal 99 (1974) 417–420.Google Scholar
Merkel, H., “Auf den Spuren des Urmarkus?” ZTK 71 (1974) 123–44. See my reply, “Merkel on the Longer Text of Mark”, ZTK 72 (1975 133–50.Google Scholar
Mullins, T., “Papias and Clement and Mark's Two Gospels”, VC 30 (1976) 189–92.Google Scholar
C. Murgia, response to Fuller (see Fuller).Google Scholar
Musurillo, H., “Morton Smith's Secret Gospel”, Thought 48 (1974) 327–31.Google Scholar
Parker, P., “An early Christian cover-up?” New York Times Book Review (22 July 1973) 5.Google Scholar
Parker, P.“On Professor Morton Smith's Find at Mar Saba”, ATR 56 (1974) 53–57.Google Scholar
Petersen, N., review, Southern Humanities Review 8 (1974) 525–31.Google Scholar
Pomilio, M., “Il frammento di Mar Saba Un Vangelo Segreto?” Studi Cattolici 21 (1978) 10–16.Google Scholar
Quesnell, Q., “The Mar Saba Clementine: A Question of Evidence”, CBQ 37 (1975) 48–67. See my reply, “On the Authenticity of the Mar Saba Letter of Clement”, CBQ 38 (1976) 196–99, and Quesnell's “A Reply to Morton Smith”, ibid., 200–203.Google Scholar
Reese, J., review, CBQ 36 (1974) 434–35.Google Scholar
Richardson, C., review, TS 35 (1974) 571–77.Google Scholar
D. Schmidt, response to Fuller (see Fuller).Google Scholar
M. Shepherd, response to Fuller (see Fuller).Google Scholar
Skehan, P., review, CHR 60 (1974) 451–53.Google Scholar
M. Smith, responses, see Fitzmyer, Fuller, Merkel, Quesnell.Google Scholar
Trevor-Roper, H., “Gospel of Liberty”, (London) Sunday Times (30 June 1974)) 15.Google Scholar
Trocmé, E., “Trois critiques au miroir de l'évangelie selon Marc”, Rhphr 55 (1975) 289–95.Google Scholar
Wink, W., “Jesus as Magician”, USQR 30 (1974) 3–14. See also the papers cited in n. 19 and the papers by Koester and Talley mentioned in the terminal note.Google Scholar