No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Theodicy, Tragedy, and Soteriology: The Legacy of Schleiermacher
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 June 2011
Extract
Despite the dilution of contemporary ethical substance by the triumph of the therapeutic, the problem of evil continues to bite. A postwar optimism that saw in technology a potential solution for every problem has been overtaken and eclipsed by a pessimism which now perceives the same technology as threatening the existence and survival of human life. The current mood has a tragic strain manifesting itself in some secular negative theodicies that see “life as unfair” and the universe run by a malevolent creator. Theology and philosophy of religion have not been entirely insulated from such perceptions. There has been considerable discussion of, and dissatisfaction with, traditional theologies and theodocies, which have prompted further investigation and search for alternatives. Two popular and widely read texts manifest the contemporary theological mood. John Hick and Paul Ricoeur discuss and criticize the classical Augustinian scheme as a theodicy. When the classical scheme is taken critically as an account of evil, it is seen to contain serious antinomies. Hence both Hick and Ricoeur seek an alternative account of evil.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © President and Fellows of Harvard College 1984
References
1 See Heilbroner, Robert, Inquiry into the Human Prospect (Norton, 1983).Google Scholar
2 See Goldman, William, The Princess Bride (New York: Ballantine Books, 1973)Google Scholar, and Vonnegut, Kurt, Cat's Cradle (New York: Delacourte Press, 1963).Google Scholar
3 Evil and the God of Love (New York: Harper & Row, 1978).Google Scholar
4 The Conflict of Interpretations (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1974).Google Scholar See “The Hermeneutics of Symbols,” a summary of the argument of Ricoeur's book, The Symbolism of Evil (trans. E. Buchanan; Boston: Beacon).
5 Schleiermacher, Friedrich, Der christliche Glaube (ed. Redeker, Martin; Berlin: De Gruyter, 1978)Google Scholar; translated as The Christian Faith (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1978).Google Scholar
6 See Williams, Robert R., Schleiermacher the Theologian (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1978).Google Scholar
7 Schleiermacher, Der christliche Glaube, §§ 40, 72.
8 Hick, Evil and the God of Love, 273.
9 Ibid., 195–98.
10 Ibid., 330, 336, 340.
11 Ibid., 351.
12 Ibid., 350.
13 Ibid., 15.
14 Hegel, G. W. F., Phenomenology of Spirit (trans. Miller, ; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977) 364–74.Google Scholar
15 Ricoeur, “Original Sin, A Study in Meaning,” in Conflict of Interpretations, 280ff.
16 Ibid., 281, 345, 351, 370.
17 Ibid., 314.
18 Ricoeur, “Guilt, Ethics and Religion,” in Conflict of Interpretations, 439.
19 Schleiermacher, Der christliche Glaube, §§ 11; 61.5; 68.3; 63; 65.
20 Ibid., § 81.4.
21 See above, 402–03.