Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 August 2011
The study of Isidore falls roughly into three periods, mediaeval, when the text was used principally for catenae and florilegia, sixteenth-and-seventeenth-century, when it was published and a rudimentary historical account of Isidore worked out from it and from the better-known testimonia, and modern. Of the modern period the outstanding works have been H. Niemeyer's account of Isidore's life and writings, Capo's, Turner's and Lake's studies establishing the relationships of the major western MSS, and the recent work of Dom Andreas Schmid, Die Christologie Isidors von Pelusium, which, by its account of the history of the text, marks a new period in the study. Besides these works, the past fifty years have seen considerable collection of parallels between Isidore's letters and passages in classical or early Christian authors, as well as several detailed discussions of the content of the letters. These discussions have uniformly been undistinguished expositions of the obvious, and the largest collection of parallels, that of L. Bayer, merited the crushing review it was given by K. Fuhr and has since been considerably supplemented by articles which individually, however, are minor.
1 Reprinted in Migne, PG 78.
2 V. inf. notes 8, 9 and 13.
3 Freiburg i.d. Schweiz, 1948 (Paradosis II).
4 Isidors von Pelusium klassische Bildung, Paderborn, 1915Google Scholar (Forsch. zur. chrl. Lit.-u.-Dogmengesch. 13.2).
5 In Berl. Phil. Wochensch. 36 (1916) 1164Google Scholar ff.
6 130 (1906) 109ff.; this I know only from Lebon's comments, v. note 7.
7 In Rev. d'hist. eccl. 13 (1912) 414f.
8 Further Notes on the MSS of Isidore of Pelusium, Jnl. of Theolog. Studies 6 (1905) 270ff.
9 The Letters of St. Isidore of Pelusium, Jnl. of Theolog. Studies 6 (1905) 70ffGoogle Scholar.
10 CSCO, Syri, vol. 6, p. 182.
11 Diss. inaug. de Isidore Pel., Göttingen, 1737, pp. 15ffGoogle Scholar.
12 I am glad to have this conclusion as to Isidore's practice confirmed by the remarks of A. D. Nock in a letter of Dec. 23, 1953, as to the general practice of ancient letter writers: ‘There can be little doubt that any ancient who wrote elaborate letters kept the equivalent of a carbon. You will remember … how one correspondent of Jerome heard from others of a letter by Jerome to him before he received it. The line between formal publication and private interchange was a good deal less clear then than now, cf. my remarks in the forthcoming number of Gnomon.’
13 De S. Isidori Pel. epistularum recensione, Studi It. di Fil. Class, 9 (1901) 449ff.
14 E.g. the small collections in Marc. gr. 495 and 525, already listed by Zanetti, Graeca Marci Bibliotheca, Venice, 1740. 495 is of the 14th c, 525 of the 15th.
15 T. Moschonas, Kataloge tes Patriarchikes Bibl., I, Alexandria, 1945.
I., and Sakkelion, A., Kat. ton Cheirographon tes Ethinkes Bibl., Athens, 1892Google Scholar. Spyridon, and Eustratiades, S., Cat. of the Gk. MSS in the Library of the Laura, Cambridge, 1925Google Scholar (Harv. Theol. Studies, XII).
Eustratiades, S. and Arcadios, , Cat. of the Gk. MSS in the Library of the Monastery of Vatopedi, Cambridge, 1924Google Scholar (Harv. Theol. Studies XI).
Lambros, S., Cat. of the Gk. MSS on Mt. Athos, Cambridge, 2 v., 1895 and 1900Google Scholar.
A. Papadopoulos-Kerameus, Hierosolymitike Bibl., Petrograd, 4 v., 1891–1915. Vladimir, Cat. of the Patriarchal Library in Moscow (title in Russian), Moscow, 1894.
Sakellion, I., Patmiake Bibliotheke, Athens, 1890Google Scholar.
Gardthausen, V., Cat. cod. graec. Sinaiticorum, Ox., 1886Google Scholar.
16 Répertoire des Bibliothèques, Paris, 1948Google Scholar (Publs. de l'Inst. de recherche … des textes, I).
17 No. 114 of Bk. I and no. 212 of Bk. II in Migne, PG 78.
18 GAL IV.106, n.i.
19 Libanius, ed. Foerster, XI.570.
20 Cat. cod. MSS Bibl. Reg. Bavaricae, ad no. 270, fol. 154 v.
21 So D. Balanos, Isidoros ho Pel., Athens, 1922, p. 36.