Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T16:38:05.428Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The End of Orthodoxy and the Catholicism of Tomorrow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2011

Romolo Murri
Affiliation:
Rome

Extract

A well-known Roman Catholic review recently observed that modernism is not merely an internal difficulty of the Catholic church, but that the Protestant and Jewish bodies are likewise tormented and undermined by it. And the remark is certainly correct. For if, on the one hand, modernism tends to apply to the internal discipline and rites of the Roman church many of those reforms which the Protestants adopted from the beginning of the Reformation,—reforms rendered necessary by the changed conditions of the times, and today even more necessary than ever, —on the other hand it is profoundly modifying the very concept of revelation and making more and more difficult every kind of stability of doctrine and every regula fidei; so that Christianity itself, and the Jewish religion from which it comes, are to a large extent challenged by it and are in a measure associated with the church of Rome in one common defence. This defence, so far as it has any probability of success, thus tends to change not only the relation of these religions to the spirit of contemporary thought, but even their inter-relations, constraining them to abandon one or another of those positions which caused dissension and associating them under the protection of their common spiritual inheritance. Hence it will be worth while to consider briefly what conclusions are suggested by the most recent experience in this controversy, and what forecast we can make, not so much for the future of the individual churches as for a future of much greater interest, that, namely, of Christianity itself and of the religious consciousness among the nations of western civilization.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © President and Fellows of Harvard College 1912

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Of clericalism I have written at length elsewhere; see, for example, La politica clericale e la democrazia, Rome, 1909Google Scholar; and religione, Della, della chiesa e dello stato, Milan, 1910Google Scholar.

2 See the volume of P. Laberthonnière, Positivisme et catholicisme, in which a laborious attempt is made to soften the famous distinction between the thesis (the exclusive right of Catholicism) and the counter-thesis (religious liberty), in so far as it is justified by peculiar historical conditions and so made tolerable.

3 I have shown elsewhere that the eschatological announcement of the Christ has no internal and necessary connection with his moral doctrine, and that it could be the spontaneous and necessary form of a religious announcement which desired to surmount the peculiar contingencies of time and space and to place the human consciousness face to face with the absolute and the eternal, with a vigorous withdrawal from the contingent and the occasional.