Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T23:19:12.899Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Cultural Mission of Russian Orthodoxy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 August 2011

Robert P. Casey
Robert P. Casey
Affiliation:
Brown University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A generation ago the study of Russian church history was considered a highly specialized field. Outside Slavic lands little attention was paid to it and in Heussi's great compendium of church history the sections on Russia occupy hardly more than a page. Similarities and differences between Russian and Roman or Anglican theology interested enthusiasts for the restoration of unity between Eastern and Western Christianity and this led in some instances to serious historical study. The names of Palmer, Neale, Stanley and Fortescue in England, of Palmieri in Italy and d'Herbigny in France, not to mention other scholars associated with the excellent publications of the Pontifical Institute of Oriental Studies, are familiar in this connection. The Ecumenical Movement after 1918 effected a wider and better understanding of the Russian Church especially in England and America. No general and popular interest, however, was stimulated or sustained.

Type
Research Article
Information
Harvard Theological Review , Volume 40 , Issue 4 , October 1947 , pp. 257 - 275
Copyright
Copyright © President and Fellows of Harvard College 1947

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Cross, S. H., The Russian Primary Chronicle (Harvard Studies in Philology and Literature xii) Cambridge, Mass., 1930, p. 137Google Scholar. Slavic text in Polnoe Sobranie russkich Letopisei I. 1, 2nd ed., Leningrad, 1926, col. 26.

2 Cross, p. 151; P.S. col. 32.

3 Cross, p. 160; P.S. col. 47.

4 Cross, pp. 168–169; P.S. cols. 60–62.

5 Cross, p. 170; P.S. col. 63.

6 Cross, p. 205; P-S. cols. 118–119.

7 Cross, p. 226; P.S. col. 151.

8 Goetz, L. K., Das Kiever Höhlenkloster als Kulturzentrum des vormongolischen Russlands. Passau, 1907Google Scholar; Fedotov, G. P., The Russian Religious Mind. Cambridge, Mass., 1946, p. 142.Google Scholar

9 The text is found in three main recensions, each with some variants. Cf. D. I. Abramovich, Issledovanie o Kievo-Pecherskom Paterike kak literaturnom pamyatnike. (Izvestiya Otdeleniya russkovo yazyka i slovesnosti Akademii Nauk 1901. Kn. 3–5, 1931; Kievo-Pecherskii Paterik, Kiev, 1931; V. Yakovlev, Pamyatniki russkoi literatury xii; xiii vekov. St. Petersburgh 1872. A modern Russian translation has been made by M. Viktorova, Kievopecherskii Paterik. Kiev 1870.

10 J. B. L. 55(3), 1936, p. 196.

11 Golubinskii, E., Istoriya russkoi tserkvi I. i, Moscow, 1904, p. 731.Google Scholar

12 Hudzii, N. K., Istoriya drevnei russkoi literatury, Moscow, 1941, pp. 30 ffGoogle Scholar; Fedotov, p. 45; A. S. Archangelskii, K izucheniyu, drevne-russkoi literatury. St. Petersburgh, 1888.

13 Pomarev, A. I., Pamyatniki drevne-russkoi tserkovno-uchitelnoi literatury I, St. Petersburgh, 1894, pp. 48 ff.Google Scholar

14 Hudzii, op. cit., p. 86, cf. S. Lichachev Natsionalnoe samosoznanie drevnei Rusi. Moscow, 1945, p. 32; Fedotov, p. 84.

15 Op. cit. I. i, p. 844.

16 Ignatius Diaconus, Vita Nicephori (ed. de Boor), p. 149; F. Dvornik, Les légendes de Constantin et de Méthode vues de Byzance (Byzantino-slavica Supplementum I) Prague, 1933, p. 28.

17 Cross, p. 304.

18 II 1, p. 30.

19 II 1, p. 31.

20 Mansikaa, V., Zhitie Aleksandra Nevskavo (Pamyatniki drevnei pismenosti i iskusstva ccxxx) Moscow, 1913Google Scholar; Hudzii, op. cit., p. 198.

21 H. Schaeder, Moskau des dritte Rom. Hamburg, 1929; Chaev, N. S., Moskva-Tretii Rim, Istoricheskie Zapiski, A. N. S. S. S. R., vol. 17, Moscow, 1945.Google Scholar

22 Casey, R. P., Religion in Russia, New York 1946, p. 87.Google Scholar

23 Op. cit., p. 96.

24 Op. cit., p. 135.

25 Op. cit., p. 164.

26 Review of Religion, May 1944, p. 371.