Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:00:21.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Commitment and Critical Inquiry*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2011

Elisabeth Schüssler Fiorenza
Elisabeth Schüssler Fiorenza
Affiliation:
Harvard Divinity School
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

We are called together here to mark the beginning of a new school year with a symbolic act—a convocatio. As cultural anthropologists tell us, such ritual symbolic acts function simultaneously to induct participants into the common lifeworld of a community and to hold up to them shared values and visions. The convocation address provides an opportunity to reflect critically on the ritual act itself and on the shared visions and values it embodies. Such exploration can uncover tensions and contradictions in how the community sees itself and the world, contradictions that provide openings and challenges for change. By reflecting on these tensions I seek to display the first step in a feminist theological practice. The inclusion of the previously excluded as theological subjects, I argue, calls for a paradigm shift from a value-detached scientism to a public rhetoric, from a hermeneutical model of conversation to a practical model of collaboration.

Type
Research Article
Information
Harvard Theological Review , Volume 82 , Issue 1 , January 1989 , pp. 1 - 11
Copyright
Copyright © President and Fellows of Harvard College 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Kuhn, Thomas S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962) passim.Google Scholar

2 “Toward a Critical Theological Education,” Harvard Divinity Bulletin 17 (1986) 6–9Google Scholar, and “Toward an American Public Theology,” ibid. 18 (1987) 4–6, 10. See also his “The Scholarly Vocation: Its Future Challenges and Threats,” ATS Theological Education 24:1 (1987) 86–101.Google Scholar

3 See, e.g., Lloyd, Genevieve, The Man of Reason: “Male” and “Female” in Western Philosophy (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984), and my “The Politics of Otherness: Biblical Interpretation as a Critical Praxis for Liberation” (forthcoming).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 See, e.g., his The Power of the Poor in History (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 1983) passim.Google Scholar

5 Lorde, Audre, Sister Outsider (Trumansburg, NY: Crossing, 1984) 110–13.Google Scholar

6 See also Collins, Patricia Hill, “Learning from the Outsider Within: The Sociological Significance of Black Feminist Thought,” Social Problems 33 (1986) 14–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 For a fuller development of the notion of biblical studies as rhetorical, see my Society of Biblical Literature presidential address, “The Ethics of Interpretation: Decentering Biblical Scholarship,” JBL 107 (1988) 3–17Google Scholar, reprinted in the Harvard Divinity Bulletin 18:3 (1988).Google Scholar

8 Farley, Edward, The Fragility of Knowledge: Theological Education in the Church and the University (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1988).Google Scholar

9 See, e.g., Hartsock, Nancy, “Rethinking Modernism: Minority vs. Majority Theories,” Cultural Critique 1 (1987) 187–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Alcoff, Linda, “Cultural Feminism versus Poststructuralism: The Identity Crisis in Feminist Theory,” Signs 13 (1988) 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10 See, e.g., Harvard President Derek Bok's report for 1986–87 to the Board of Overseers which was issued in April 1988.

11 Geertz, Clifford, “The Way We Think Now: Toward an Ethnography of Modern Thought,” in idem, Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology (New York: Basic Books, 1983) 147–63.Google Scholar

12 Stendahl, Krister, “The Bible as Classic and the Bible as Holy Scripture,” JBL 103 (1984) 10.Google Scholar

13 See also Koester's, Helmut Convocation address “The Divine Human Being,” HTR 78 (1985) 243–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14 For the importance of pluralism in theological articulation, see Eck, Diana L., “Darsana: Hinduism and Incarnational Theology,” Harvard Divinity Bulletin 17 (1987) 10–11Google Scholar, and in theological education, see Miles, Margaret R., “Hermeneutics of Generosity and Suspicion: Pluralism and Theological Education,” ATS Theological Education 23 (1987) 34–52.Google Scholar

15 Kaufman, Gordon D., “Nuclear Eschatology and the Study of Religion,” JAAR 51 (1983) 13.Google Scholar

16 Christ, Carol P., The Laughter of Aphrodite: Reflections on a Journey to the Goddess (Boston: Beacon, 1987) 214.Google Scholar

17 McFague, Sally, Models of God: Theology for an Ecological Nuclear Age (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1987).Google Scholar