No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 January 2009
The relationship of man to his domestic animals is an ever-fascinating study: they are so near to us, yet so remote, so like us, yet separated from us by an abyss. Of some we make pets; others we merely use, to work for us or to give us food or clothing. To each species we assign a character, and we like or dislike its members according to our prejudice. In studying a people, we cannot ignore their attitude towards the animals which form part of their daily lives.
The most revealing relationship is perhaps that between man and the domestic cat; but the cat does not seem to have been known in Greece Proper as a domestic animal; and although it was known in the Greek colonies of southern Italy by the fifth century b.c., it remained almost an Egyptian monopoly until Imperial Roman times. When the αϊλoυρoς in Greece is mentioned, apparently the polecat, the ancestor of our ferret, is meant. The horse and dog are good subjects for this study; but I pass them over for the present, the horse because too much is said of him, the dog because what is said is not particularly interesting. Many pleasant things are said of pigs by the Greeks, the pig being to them the type of clumsiness, bad temper, and stupidity as well as of uncleanliness; for instance, there is 
ς 
óἀ ῥóωv of a brutish fellow in refined surroundings; and the Chorus Leader's threat in the Lysistrata λ
σω τἠν ἐμαυτ
ς ν shows that the Greeks knew what it was to incur the wrath of a sow.
page 33 note 1 Jennison, George, Animals for Show and Pleasure in Ancient Rome, pp. 129–30.Google Scholar
page 33 note 2 Crates Com. Frg. 4.
page 33 note 3 Aristoph, . Lysistr. 684.Google Scholar
page 34 note 1 Xen, . Anab. 1. v. 2; 11. i. 6Google Scholar; Cyrop. 11. iv. 20.
page 34 note 2 Ps.-Plut., Sept. sap. conviv. 5.Google Scholar
page 34 note 3 e.g. vid. Aesopi fabulae ed. Halm, : the goat has 6 fables, sheep 7, horse 11, ox and bull 12, dog 26, donkey 27.Google Scholar
page 34 note 4 xi. 558 sqq.
page 34 note 5 Frg. 19.
page 34 note 6 Frg. 7.
page 35 note 1 Frg. 4.
page 35 note 2 v. 996.
page 35 note 3 ap. Stob. cvi. 8.
page 35 note 4 ap. Stob. xcviii. 8.
page 35 note 5 ap. Apostol. xii. 87a.
page 35 note 6 Suid. s.v.
page 35 note 7 Macart. Prov. vi. 31.
page 35 note 8 Diogenian. vii. 30.
page 35 note 9 Ep. 11. i. 200.
page 35 note 10 Diogenian. vii. 33 n.
page 35 note 11 Menand. 527.
page 35 note 12 Lucian, . Pseudol. 7.Google Scholar
page 35 note 13 Cratinus ap. Phot. Suid. Apostol. xii. 85.
page 35 note 14 Diogenian. vi. 100.
page 35 note 15 Philem. 188.
page 35 note 16 Apostol. xii. 75a.
page 35 note 17 Macart. iv. 14.
page 36 note 1 Menand. 402, 8.
page 36 note 2 Metamorph. iii. 24 sqq.
page 36 note 3 Suid., Phot., etc.
page 36 note 4 Zenob. v. 38; Hesych.
page 36 note 5 Aristoph. Ran. 186.
page 36 note 6 Paroem. app. ii. 29.
page 36 note 7 Crates Com. 36.
page 36 note 8 Apostol. iv. 53.
page 36 note 9 Apostol. vi. 51; Zenob. iii. 54; Suid.
page 36 note 10 Apostol. xii. 66a.
page 36 note 11 Aesop. fab. 339; Ps.-Plut, . Dec. orat. vit. viii, 848a.Google Scholar
page 36 note 12 191.
page 36 note 13 260c.
page 36 note 14 Frg. 331.
page 37 note 1 Menand. ap. Zenob. v. 39; Aesop. 190, Phot., Suid., Apostol. xii. 87.
page 37 note 2 Met. ix. 42.
page 37 note 3 Zenob. i. 74.
page 37 note 4 Aesop. fab. 238; Macart. vi. 32.
page 37 note 5 Paroem. app. iv. 25; cf. Aesop. 331; Babr. 131.
page 37 note 6 Chrysostom. ad Paul. Eph. 4.
page 37 note 7 Theophr. De sign. 41.
page 38 note 1 Aelian, . Hist. an. xii. 34.Google Scholar
page 38 note 2 Hdt. iv. 129.
page 38 note 3 22 sqq.
page 38 note 4 Aristoph. Ran. 159 et schol.
page 38 note 5 Athen. v. 200e, f.
page 38 note 6 Aesop. fab. 324, 324b.
page 38 note 7 Ovid, , Fast. i. 391, 440; vi. 345.Google ScholarLactant, . Instit. i. 21, 25 sqq.Google Scholar
page 38 note 8 Hesych. s.v. ἀνεμώτας.
page 38 note 9 Aesop, fab. 333b, 336; Apostol. xi. 89a.
page 38 note 10 Apostol. xvi. 19a, Aesop, fab. 333b.
page 38 note 11 Suid., Apostol. xii. 84.
page 38 note 12 Apostol. xii. 87.
page 39 note 1 Hdt. iv. 134–6.
page 39 note 2 Phot., Apostol. xvii. 43.
page 39 note 3 Apostol. xii. 79.
page 39 note 4 Apostol. x. 31.
page 39 note 5 Apostol. xii. 78a.
page 39 note 6 Cic. Pis. 73.
page 39 note 7 Paus. x. 29. 2.
page 39 note 8 Anab. v. viii. 3.
page 39 note 9 De vict. atten. 66.
page 39 note 10 Hdt. i. 133.
page 39 note 11 Poll. ix. 48; Hesych. s.v. μέμνων.
page 40 note 1 Aristot, . Hist. An. iii. 103.Google Scholar
page 40 note 2 Ps.-Hipp. i. 675; ii. 65, 93, 97, etc.
page 40 note 3 Plin. xi. 238; cp. Dio Cass. lxii. 28.
page 40 note 4 Diog. L. viii. 60.
page 40 note 5 Apostol. xii. 90.
page 40 note 6 1037.
page 40 note 7 Plut. Alex. 73.
page 40 note 8 Diog. L. vii. 185.
page 40 note 9 Plut. Ant. 65.
page 41 note 1 Plut. Quaest. Rom. 48.
page 41 note 2 Am. 11. vii. 15.