Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:28:56.827Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Tradition of The Athenian Democracy A.D. 1750–1990

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2009

Mogens Herman Hansen
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

By 1994 no less than 2,500 years will have passed since Kleisthenes (in 507 B.C.) introduced democracy to Athens, and the anniversary will undoubtedly be celebrated by all nations that call themselves democracies, i.e., practically everywhere in the western world. But during the celebrations sceptics will probably ask at least two fundamental questions: first, how much do Athenian demokratia and modern democracy have in common and second, to what extent were modern democratic ideas and institutions shaped by looking back upon the ancient model? Was Athens the school not only of Hellas – as Perikles claimed in his funeral speach – but also of the political system and ideology that are universally accepted in the western world of today? Or, alternatively, is the Athenian example just one small piece in the great jigsaw puzzle that constitutes modern democracy and even a fairly unimportant piece, one of those elusive pieces that has nothing but sky or water on it and, accordingly, is almost impossible to place correctly?

Type
Research Article
Information
Greece & Rome , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , April 1992 , pp. 14 - 30
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1992

References

Notes

1. Andrewes, A., ‘Kleisthenes' Reform Bill’, CQ 27 (1977), 246–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ostwald, M., ‘The Reform of the Athenian State by Kleisthenes’, CAH IV (1988), pp. 306–7Google Scholar.

2. Thuc. 2.41.1.

3. Encyclopedia Britannica 15th edn. (1955), vol. 7 p. 182Google Scholar.

4. Thuc. 2.37. 1–3.

5. Cf. Thuc. 5.81.2, 8.38.3, 8.53.3, 8.89.2.

6. Cf. Gomme, A. W., A Historical Commentary on Thycydides II (Oxford, 1956), p. 108Google Scholar.

7. Hansen, M. H., Was Athens a Democracy? Popular Rule, Liberty and Equality in Ancient and Modern Political Thought, Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab. Historisk-Filosofiske Meddelelser 59 (1989)Google Scholar.

8. Cf., e.g., J. Rufus Fears in his ‘Preface’ to Connor, W. R., Hansen, M. H., Raaflaub, K. A., and Strauss, B. S., Aspects of Athenian Democracy (Copenhagen, 1990), pp. 4–5Google Scholar.

9. On Revolution (1963, Pelican edn 1973), p. 196.

10. Thuc. 2.37.1, 3.82.1; Arist, . Pol. 1307b23–24Google Scholar; Meiggs and Lewis, 40.

11. Gehrke, H.-J., Jenseits von Alhen und Sparta (Munich, 1986)Google Scholar.

12. Arist. Pol. 1286b20–22, 1291b7–13, 1296a22–23, 1301b39–40.

13. Grg. 515C–519A.

14. Chase, A. H., ‘The Influence of Athenian Institutions upon the Laws of Plato', HSCP 44 (1933), 131–92Google Scholar.

15. Pol. 299B–C.

16. Pol.1273b35–74a21.

17. Hansen, , The Athenian Democracy in the Age of Demosthenes (Oxford, 1991), pp. 69, 125, 301Google Scholar.

18. Polyb. 6.43.

19. On the revival of Arist. Pol. with Wilhelm of Moerbeke's Latin version c. 1250, cf. J. Aubonnet in the Bude edn. Vol. I (1968), pp. cxlviiff.

20. Les six livres de la république (1576), 2.1, 7 here quoted from Tooley's, translation (Oxford, 1951), pp. 51–52Google Scholar.

21. De Regimine Principum 16.

22. Defensor Pads 1.8.2–3.

23. Discorsi 1.2.3–4, 11–12.

24. De Give7.1, 5–7.

25. The Second Treatise of Government 132.

26. Commentaries 1.2.7.

27. ‘Government’ in Encyclopedia Britannica (1820), pp. 3–5.

28. Reinhold, M., ‘Eighteenth-Century American Political Thought1', in Classical Influences on Western Thought A.D. 1650–1870, ed. Bolgar, R. R. (Cambridge, 1979), pp. 225, 233Google Scholar, and passim.

29. Rawson, E., The Spartan Tradition in European Thought (Oxford, 1969), pp. 268–300Google Scholar; Reinhold (n. 28), pp. 228 et alibi.

30. Reprinted in M. Gauchet, De la liberté chez les modemes: écritspolitiques (Paris, 1980), pp. 494–5, 500,509.

31. Ibid. pp. 496, 500 with note 14. Cf. also his De I'esprit de conquête et de I'usurpation (1814), II.6 and 7.

32. Defence of the Constitutions of Government of the United States of America (1787–8) in Works (Boston, 1851), IV. 472–92Google Scholar.

33. De I'esprit des lois (edn. Garnier Paris, 1967), I. 12–15Google Scholar, 25, 48–49, 52, 54, 122; 11.107, 282.

34. ‘Démocratic’, Encyclopedic IV (1754), 816–18Google Scholar.

35. Discours sur les sciences et les arts in Oeuvres III (Pléiade edn. Paris, 1967), 10Google Scholar, 12, 56, (lettres)68, 81; Sur I'économie politique (ibid.), 246.

36. Pol. 1273b35–74a21.

37. Geschichte der Kunst des Altertums 1.4 (130–3).

38. Fragments, in Werke in fünf Bänden (1981), II.74Google Scholar, 77, 84.

39. Müller, Carl Otfried, Die Dorier (1824)Google Scholar.

40. Cf. Turner, F. M., The Greek Heritage in Victorian Britain (London, 1981), p. 187Google Scholar.

41. Démosthène (Paris, 1924)Google Scholar.

42. ‘Ein antikes System des Naturrechts’, Internationale Monatsschrift für Wissenschaft Kunst und Technik 11 (1916–1917), 82–102Google Scholar; Neustadt, E. and Röhm, G., Geschichte des Altertums (1924)Google Scholar; Hack, W., Geschichte der Griechen und Römer (1930)Google Scholar. Cf. the famous short story by Böll, Heinrich, ‘Wanderer, kommst du nach Spa…’ (1950)Google Scholar.

43. Aus einer alten Advokatenrepublik (Paderborn, 1916), pp. 1–4Google Scholar: ‘Advokaten gegen Könige.’

44. On Periklean Athens see Vol. 6 (1848), Part 2, Chapters 46–48, especially pp. 176–84 with a long quotation from Perikles' funeral oration and Grote's praise of Athenian democracy.

45. On Periklean Athens see Vol. 2 Chapter 19.1 (Périclès) and 3 (La Constitution athénienne), pp. 145–54 and 196–214 in the 1888 edition.

46. On Periklean Athens, see Vol. 2, Book 3, Chapter 3 (pp. 157–280): ‘Die Friedensjahre’.

47. History of Greece I. preface xvi; Mill, J. S., review of Grote, History of Greece VIII, Edinburgh Review Oct. 1853, in Collected Works of John Stuart Mill 9 (Toronto, 1978), pp. 323Google Scholar, 328.

48. Cf., e.g., Sartori, G., Democratic Theory (Westport, 1962), pp. 250–77Google Scholar; Held, D., Models of Democracy (Cambridge, 1987), pp. 13–35Google Scholar.

49. Arist, . Ath. Pol. 43–44Google Scholar.

50. Kellenberger, M., Die Landsgemeinden der Schweizerischen Kantone (Winterthur, 1965)Google Scholar.

51. Hansen, , ‘The Athenian Ecclesia and the Swiss Landsgemeinde’, The Athenian Ecclesia: a Collection of Articles 1976–83 (Copenhagen, 1983), pp. 207–26Google Scholar.

52. Sly, J. F., Town Government in Massachusetts 1620–1930 (Cambridge, Mass., 1930)Google Scholar.

53. Stout, S. H., The New England Soul (Oxford, 1986), p. 22Google Scholar.

54. Hansen (n. 17), pp. 197–9, 230–5.

55. Finlay, R., Politics in Renaissance Venice (London, 1980), pp. 141–2Google Scholar.

56. Najemy, J. M., Corporatism and Consensus in Florentine Electoral Politics 1280–1400 (Chapel Hill, 1982)Google Scholar.

57. Compare, for example, the voting procedure in the Athenian 5th-century courts, described by Boegehold, A. in Hesperia 32 (1963), 367–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar, with the procedure described in Waley, D., The Italian City-Republics (London, 1969), pp. 30–31Google Scholar.

58. Taylor, L. Ross, Roman Voting Assemblies (Ann Arbor, 1966), pp. 34–58Google Scholar.

59. Ehrenberg, V., ‘Losung', RE XIII.2 (1927), 1493–1504Google Scholar.

60. Letter from Alexander Hamilton to Gouverneur Morris of May 19th, 1777.

61. Palmer, R. R., ‘Notes on the Use of the Word “Democracy” 1789–99’, Political Science Quarterly 68 (1953), 203–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

62. Rights of Man, ed. Kuklick, B. (Cambridge, 1989), p. 170Google Scholar.

63. Roper, J., Democracy and its Critics: Anglo-American Democratic Thought in the Nineteenth Century (London, 1989)Google Scholar.

64. Constitution de la Conféderation Suisse du 12 Septembre 1848.

65. Cf. de Tocqueville's report of 15th Jan. 1848 on the subject of M. Cherbuliez' book entitled On Democracy in Switzerland, printed as Appendix II in Mayer's, J. P. edition of De la démocratic en Amérique (New York, 1966), p. 740Google Scholar.

66. Cf, e.g., the entry ‘Democracy’ in the 1lth edn. of Encyclopedia Britannica VIII (1910), pp. 1–2Google Scholar and in International Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences (1968), pp. 112–21.

67. Even as late as 1847 Grote, George could still write in his History of Greece IV. 346: ‘Democracy happens to be unpalatable to most modern readers.’Google Scholar

68. Holden, B., The Nature of Democracy (London, 1974), p. 2Google Scholar.

69. Holden (n. 68), pp. 140–6.

70. Campbell, B., ‘Paradigms lost: Classical Athenian Politics in Modern Myth’, History of Political Thought 10 (1989), 189–213Google Scholar; Finley, M. I., Democracy Ancient and Modern (New Brunswick, N.J., 2nd ed. 1985), pp. 33–37Google Scholar.

71. Hansen (n. 17), p. 313.

72. Mill, J. S., Considerations on Representative Government (1861), p. 197Google Scholar.

73. Bentham, J., A Fragment on Government (1776), 2.34 with note 2Google Scholar.

74. Arterton, F. Chr., Teledemocracy: Can Technology protect Democracy? (Washington, 1987)Google Scholar.

75. Barber, B. J., Strong Democracy: Participatory Democracy for a New Age (Berkeley, 1984), pp. 239–40, 268, 272, 273–8Google Scholar.

76. McLean, I., Democracy and New Technology (Cambridge, 1989), pp. 157–61Google Scholar.

77. Rights of Man (n. 62), p. 170.

78. Parker, H. T., The Cult of Antiquity and the French Revolutionaries (Chicago, 1937), p. 76 with n. 7 et alibiGoogle Scholar.

79. Holden, B., Understanding Liberal Democracy (Oxford, 1988), p. 28Google Scholar.

80. Arist, . Pol. 1310a28–33Google Scholar. Hansen (n. 7), pp. 3, 25–28.

81. Isok. 7.20.

82. Above n. 77.

83. An Essay on Government(1820), ed. Shields, C. V. (New York, 1955), p. 55Google Scholar.

84. Pappe, H. O., ‘The English Utilitarians and Athenian Democracy’, in , Bolgar (n. 28), p. 296Google Scholar.

85. Plan of Parliamentary Reform (1817) in The Works of Bentham 10 (London, 1839), p. 438Google Scholar: ‘This bugbear word democracy.’

86. Hanson, R. L., ‘Democracy’, in Political Innovation and Conceptual Change, ed. Ball, T., Farr, J., and Hanson, R. L. (Cambridge, 1989), pp. 78–9Google Scholar.

87. E.g., John C. Calhoun and George Fitzhugh. The only intellectual who focused on Athens was, apparently, Hugh Swinton Legare: cf. Briggs, W. W. Jr., ‘Classical Influence in the Southern Response to the Constitution’, unpublished paper read in Boston in 09 1989Google Scholar.

88. De la démocratie en Amérique Vol. 2, Part 2, Chapter 1.

89. ibid. Vol. 2, Part 1, Chapter 15: ‘Pourquoi l'étude de la littérature grecque et latine est particulièrement utile dans les sociétés démocratiques.’

90. The title of Vol. 2, Part 1, Chapter 2 is: ‘Pourquoi les peuples démocratiques montrent un amour plus ardent et plus durable pour l'égalité que pour la liberté.’

91. La démocratie (Paris, 1860), p. 7Google Scholar [= de Tocqueville, 2.2.1, but without the modifications].

92. Conze, W., ‘Demokratie', Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe I (Stuttgart, 1972), pp. 885–6Google Scholar.

93. Gervinus, Georg Gottfried, Einleitung in die Geschichte des neunzehnten Jahrhunderts (Leipzig, 1853)Google Scholar.

94. Germania 11.

95. Montesquieu (n. 33), 1.170.

96. History of Greece IV.345; VI.18O.

97. On Liberty (1859), Chapter 1 (pp. 19–20 in the Prometheus Books edn.).

98. La cité antique (Paris, 1864), 3.7Google Scholar.