Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T05:30:46.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stoic and Epicurean: A Post-War Commentary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2009

Extract

Amidst the conflict of opposing forces in these twenty years since the Armistice—social, political, literary, economic—one of the most acutely debated questions emerging from the tumult is, In what faith (if any) can an intelligent man and woman believe? The large popular demand for books on religion and its relation to art, psychology, reality, politics, and ethics, together with frequent written or broadcast pronouncements by responsible religious authorities, leave no doubt about the increased interest in non-material problems. Popular articles appear in the evening papers by deans, bishops, and laymen, and even sporting ‘stars’ appear in print with religious views. Furthermore, we hear the Voice of Under Thirty accompanying Nero amid the wreckage of ideals and faith, whose validity would seem to have died with Queen Victoria.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1939

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 92 note 1 Grigson, Geoffrey (‘Painting and Sculpture’) in The Arts To-day, pp. 74–5.Google Scholar

page 92 note 2 MacNeice, Louis, Eclogue for Christmas.Google Scholar

page 93 note 1 Idem, Circe.

page 93 note 2 Horace, , Od. I. xiv: 1. xi. 6.Google Scholar

page 96 note 1 Laertius, Diogenes, x. 38.Google Scholar

page 96 note 2 De rer. nat. i. 150.Google Scholar

page 96 note 3 Diog, . Laert, . x. 128.Google Scholar

page 96 note 4 Ibid. x. 132.

page 97 note 1 Ibid. X. 148.

page 97 note 2 Lucretius, , ii. 1090.Google Scholar

page 97 note 3 Ibid. v. 1129.

page 97 note 4 Ibid. i.62 ff.

page 97 note 5 Ibid. iii. 830

page 98 note 1 Diog, . Laert, . x. 123Google Scholar; Lucr, . ii. 646 ff.Google Scholar

page 99 note 1 Menander, ap. Plut, . De tranq. anim. 15, 4746Google Scholar; cf. Epict, . Diss. i. 14Google Scholar; Psalm 121; Seneca, Ep. 41, ‘a holy spirit residing in us’.

page 99 note 2 ‘A benefit consists not in the gift but in the mind of the giver’: Sen. De benef. i. 6. 2.

page 99 note 3 De clement, , i. 6.Google Scholar

page 99 note 4 Diog, . Laert, . vii. 87Google Scholar; Cicero, , De fin. iv. 14.Google Scholar

page 99 note 5 Aen. vi. 724Google Scholar; cf. Georg. iv. 221 ff.Google Scholar

page 100 note 1 Aurelius, Marcus, ii. 17 (tr. Long).Google Scholar

page 100 note 2 Ibid. v. 27.

page 100 note 3 Ibid. v. 27; hymn, Cleanthes', 1. 4Google Scholar; Acts, xvii. 28, 29Google Scholar; Plato, , Critias, 542.Google Scholar

page 100 note 4 Aurelius, Marcus, vi. 44Google Scholar: cf. ii. 1; vii. 31.

page 100 note 5 Ibid. i. 14 (Long).

page 100 note 6 Cf. Hearnshaw, F. J. C., Political Ideas, pp. 36–7.Google Scholar