Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T14:44:05.259Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Miltonic Light on Professor Denys Page's Homeric Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2009

Douglas Young
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In his sprightly volume The Homeric Odyssey (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1955; originally the Mary Flexner Lectures at Bryn Mawr College, Pennsylvania), Professor Denys Page favoured the public with what he terms (p. 149) a few points of interest from his notes on the vocabularies of the Iliad and the Odyssey. Listing words and phrases found in the Iliad but rarely or never in the Odyssey, and vice versa, he concludes (p. 157) ‘that the two poems were composed and transmitted in separate regions of Hellas’.

Type
Research Article
Information
Greece & Rome , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , March 1959 , pp. 96 - 108
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1959

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 I am not convinced by his Chapter V. Homer could not leave his hero with an unsettled blood-feud.

1 See his article, ‘In Defence of Homer’, Greece & Rome, Second Series, iii (1956), 123.Google Scholar