No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 January 2009
MR. W. F. Witton's reconsiderations of grammatical rules, ‘invented’, as he suggests, ‘by some unimaginative medieval scholar’, must be welcome to all teachers and students of the classics. Modern readers, both in schoolroom and in lecture-hall, are less ready to exploit the ambiguities of ‘the exception proves the rule’ than were the medieval Schoolmen, and a reluctance to accept arbitrary laws without examining the credentials of the legislator is one of the more healthy symptoms of this hypercritical and sometimes anarchical age.
page 155 note 1 ‘Heresies III’, Greece and Rome for Oct. 1935, p. 49.Google Scholar
page 155 note 2 Olympians, vi. 141.Google Scholar
page 156 note 1 Essays and Addresses, p. 84.Google Scholar
page 156 note 2 Pind, . Ol. vi. 155.Google Scholar
page 156 note 3 Pythians, iv. 158.Google Scholar
page 156 note 4 Od. xi. 320.Google Scholar
page 156 note 5 l. 659.
page 157 note 1 Iph. in Taur., 1. 300.Google Scholar
page 157 note 2 Defined by Müller, Max, in Three Lectures on the Science of Language, trans. London 1891, lecture i, p. 27Google Scholar, as ‘what remains of a number of words after we separate their formative elements’, i.e. something very like ύλη without είλος.
page 158 note 1 Il. xix. 362.
page 158 note 2 ‘… resonant plangore cachinni’, 64, 274.Google Scholar
page 158 note 3 Stephanus connects the Latin gelu gelidus, i.e. the brightness of frost and later coldness. Stephanus has much more support for the brightness theory.
page 158 note 4 ll. 1175 sq.
page 159 note 1 A gloss in Hesychius brings out that both ἄνθος and γελα̃ν were first named from one strangely similar external characteristic: γελεĩν . . λάμπειν, ἀνθεĩν. Of course I am not denying that γελα̃ν often means to laugh. My point is that that meaning is only secondary and derivative to the brightness concept.