No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Extract
The claim that Alexander the Paphlagonian is greater than his Macedonian namesake is perhaps hardly to be taken seriously, yet an ingenious pro-Paphlagonian might argue with justice that his Alexander ‘conquered’ a large part of the Roman Empire; that this conquest was almost bloodless; and that the story of it appeals to the sense of humour, which is more than can be said for the history of Philip's filibustering son.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Classical Association 1936
References
page 93 note 1 These now claim that this was not the real box, and are renewing their agitation.