Women in Roman Life and Letters1

F. E. Adcock

doi:10.1017/S0017383500008688

Women in Roman Life and Letters1

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 January 2009

F. E. Adcock

Article contents

Extract
References

Get access

Rights & Permissions

Extract

The infant community of Rome grew up with neighbours who conceded a fairly high place to women. Etruscan sepulchral art suggests as much; the tomb paintings of early Campania show the womenfolk spruce, dignified, and house-proud; the authoritarian rule of the Sabine mother was traditional. Granted that in certain places and at certain times women were taboo, in a sense ‘infectious’, to use Warde Fowler's word, yet in the home the Roman wife had never been banished to a gynaeceum. The Atrium, the heart of the Roman house, was the wife's territory as much as the husband's. Though every Roman household was a monarchy with the paterfamilias as king, the womenfolk were no more, if no less, his subjects than the sons. When the Roman husband carried his wife into the Atrium, and she spoke the sacramental words ‘ubi tu Gaius ibi ego Gaia’, she made a claim that, in its due sphere, was admitted. In this sphere the Roman husband was more at home than the Greek, who hated not to be out of doors in the daytime. In a speech which Tacitus writes for Valerius Messalinus there is the truly Roman phrase ‘revertentibus post laborem quod honestius quam uxorium levamentum?’—‘the relief of a wife's society’—a society, that is, to quote another phrase from the same passage, ‘consortium rerum secundarum adversarumque’. When Lucretius writes:

iam iam non domus accipiet te laeta, neque uxor optima nee dulces occurrent oscula nati praeripere et tacita pectus dulcedine tangent the adjectives carry a weight of feeling.

Type: Research Article
Information: Greece & Rome , Volume 14 , Issue 40 , January 1945 , pp. 1 - 11

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0017383500008688 [Opens in a new window]
Copyright: Copyright © The Classical Association 1945

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

^{page 1 note 2} Horace, , Od. iii. 6. 38–40.Google Scholar

^{page 1 note 3} Arm. iii. 34; see xii. 5. 5.

^{page 1 note 4} iii. 894–6.

^{page 2 note 1} Malcovati, , Orat. Rom. Frag. i, p. 313.Google Scholar

^{page 2 note 2} Suetonius, , Div. Iul. 6.Google Scholar

^{page 3 note 1} N.A. ii. 23.

^{page 3 note 2} Lls. 42–7 Ribbeck.

^{page 3 note 3} L. 326 Ribbeck.

^{page 3 note 4} de agri cultura 143.

^{page 3 note 5} Pictor, Fabiusap. Pliny, N.H. xiv. 89.Google Scholar

^{page 3 note 6} Malcovati, , op. cit. i, p. 213.Google Scholar

^{page 4 note 1} ‘Une ordalie par le poison à Rome’ in Cultes, mythes et religions, iii, pp. 254 ff.

^{page 4 note 2} Origines, frag. 114, Peter.

^{page 4 note 3} Polybius, xxxii. 12.

^{page 4 note 4} Frags. 3 and 4, Riese, p. 140.

^{page 5 note 1} Plutarch, , Cato Major 8.Google Scholar

^{page 5 note 2} Od. ii. 12. 17–20.

^{page 5 note 3} Cicéron et ses amis, p. 175.

^{page 5 note 4} Plutarch, , Lucullus, 6.Google Scholar

^{page 5 note 5} Malcovati, , op. cit. i, p. 190.Google Scholar

^{page 5 note 6} L. 87.

^{page 5 note 7} Od. iii. 24. 19–20.

^{page 5 note 8} 18.

^{page 5 note 9} Malcovati, , op. cit. i, pp. 240 f.Google Scholar

^{page 6 note 1} Bell. Cattt. 25.

^{page 6 note 2} Pomp. 55.

^{page 6 note 3} ad Attic. v. i.

^{page 7 note 1} Paraphrase by Fowler, W. Warde, Social Life at Rome in the Age of Cicero, pp. 166 f.Google Scholar

^{page 7 note 2} Aen. i. 46–7.

^{page 7 note 3} Aen. vii. 803 ff.

^{page 7 note 4} Aen. viii. 407 if.

^{page 7 note 5} Suetonius, , Calig. 23.Google Scholar

^{page 7 note 6} Ann. xiii. 45.

^{page 8 note 1} Agric. 6. 1.

^{page 8 note 2} Sat. vi. 434 ff.

^{page 8 note 3} See Charlesworth, M. P., Five Men, p. 42.Google Scholar

^{page 8 note 4} Ep. i. 16. 6.

^{page 8 note 5} Ep. iv. 19. 1–5.

^{page 9 note 1} C.I.L. v. 2. 7066.

^{page 9 note 2} C.I.L. vi. 3. 15696.

^{page 9 note 3} Paraphrased from Ep. i. 14.

^{page 9 note 4} de benef. iii. 16. 2.

^{page 9 note 5} Petronius, , Sat. 67.Google Scholar

^{page 9 note 6} Pliny, , N.H. ix. 117.Google Scholar

^{page 10 note 1} Dessau, I.L.S. 3513.Google Scholar

^{page 10 note 2} viii. 3.

^{page 10 note 3} Dig. iii. i. 5.

^{page 10 note 4} See on all this Abbott, F. F., Society and Politics in Ancient Rome, pp. 77 ff.Google Scholar

^{page 10 note 5} Tacitus, , Ann. xiii. 21.Google Scholar

^{page 11 note 1} Ant. Hel. 4. 3–4.

^{page 11 note 2} Ibid.Aur. 49. 6.

^{page 11 note 3} Dessau, , I.L.S. 442–4, and possibly 2438.Google Scholar

^{page 11 note 4} Ann. xii. 37. 6.

^{page 11 note 5} Dessau, , I.L.S. 4928–9.Google Scholar

^{page 11 note 6} C.I.L. vi. 3. 15346.

Article contents

Women in Roman Life and Letters1

Extract

Access options

References

Save article to Kindle

Save article to Dropbox

Save article to Google Drive

Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

You have entered the maximum number of contributors

Conflicting interests