Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T01:20:24.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Aims of Alexander1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2009

P. A. Brunt
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Sir William Tarn wrote that ‘the primary reason why Alexander invaded Persia was, no doubt, that he never thought of not doing it; it was his inheritance’. The invasion had been planned and begun by Philip. It was, in name, a Panhellenic enterprise, to exact retribution for the devastation wrought by Xerxes in Greece and to liberate the Greeks of Asia Minor. These aims Alexander faithfully fulfilled. From the spoils of the Granicus he dedicated three hundred Persian panoplies to Athens' tutelary goddess; he sent back to Athens the statues of Harmo-dius and Aristogiton which Xerxes had carried off to Susa; and he excused the burning of Persepolis as a reprisal for the sack of Athens. The Panhellenic war was then over, and Alexander sent the Greek contingents home (A. iii. 19. 5). In general he freed the Greek cities of Asia from the control of satraps; they were to pay no taxes, to receive no garrisons and to live under their own laws. By expelling tyrants or oligarchs and setting up democratic governments, he not only removed the partisans of Persia from power but did homage to the growing tendency in Greece to equate freedom with democracy. The gratitude of the liberated cities was long-enduring; it was here that his cult survived into Roman times. In reality of course they were as much subject to his will as less privileged subjects. And to Greek cities that opposed him he was less accommodating. Halicarnassus and Aspendus, which certainly counted as Greek, were subjected to his satraps. They could be treated as disloyal to the Panhellenic cause, like the captive mercenaries who fought against him at the Granicus and who were sent back in chains to forced labour in Macedon. But Alexander was not always so merciless. He spared the mercenaries who were holding out against him on an island in the harbour of Miletus, and enlisted them in his own army; it would not have been easy to take the island by force. Sentiment and principle gave way to his own interests, as they always did.

Type
Research Article
Information
Greece & Rome , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , October 1965 , pp. 205 - 215
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 205 note 2 Polyb. iii. 6. 8 ff.; D. xvi. 89. 2; 91. 2; xvii. 24. 1; A. ii. 14. 4.

page 205 note 3 A. i. 16. 7; iii. 16. 7–8; 18. 11–12; vi. 30. 1.

page 205 note 4 Cf. Badian, , p. 169.Google Scholar

page 205 note 5 Jones, A. H. M., The Greek City from Alexander to Justinian (Oxford, 1940), ch. x.Google Scholar

page 205 note 6 Inschr. von Priene 108, 75Google Scholar; OGIS 3.Google Scholar

page 205 note 7 A. i. 23. 8; 27. 4. Halicarnassus Greek (contra Tarn, ii. 218)Google Scholar, Hdt. ii. 178; vii. 99.

page 206 note 1 A. i. 16. 6; 19. 6.

page 206 note 2 Polyb. iii. 6. 8ff.

page 206 note 3 The grant of privileges to Sidonians at Athens and the foundation of cults of Isis there (Tod 139; 189) are revealing.

page 206 note 4 Isocr. v. 107–8 (cf. Hdt. v. 20–22; viii. 137–9). Arrian's sources also distinguish Greeks and Macedonians, e.g. Ind. 18. 6–7 (Nearchus).Google Scholar

page 206 note 5 Aeschin. iii. 239 ff.; Dinarch, . i. 10Google Scholar; 18; Plut. Dem. 20Google Scholar; A. ii. 13. 6.

page 206 note 6 D. xvii. 9. 5; cf. 62 (Agis).

page 206 note 7 Some cities saw in Philip or Alexander a protector against powerful and aggressive neighbours, cf. Polyb. xviii. 14; thus Argos and Messene were pro-Macedonian from fear of Sparta, but they too rose against Macedon in the Lamian war, when Sparta was prostrate, as did the Thessalians (D. xviii. 11).

page 206 note 8 A. i. 18. 8; 29. 6; ii. 17, etc.

page 207 note 1 But see iv. 155; 183; 185; v. 124–6 (?).

page 207 note 2 But see iv. 181; xii. 103; ep. ix. 8.

page 207 note 3 iv. 131–3; 174; 182; 187; v. 9; 84–85; 107–8; 112; 120–2; 129–45.

page 207 note 4 A. ii. 14. 2.

page 207 note 5 A. i. 17. i and 7.

page 207 note 6 A. ii. 25.

page 208 note 1 D. xvii. 17. 2. For another view cf. Badian, , pp. 166 ff.Google Scholar

page 208 note 2 Cited in A. ii. 3. 7.

page 208 note 3 A. iii. 16. 9; 25. 1; vi. 3. 1, &c.

page 208 note 4 A. ii. 7. 3; 14. 7; iii. 3. 4; v. 3. 1; 29. 1. The story in Callisthenes (Jacoby, , Fragm. d. griech. Hist. no. 124) F 31Google Scholar that the Pamphylian sea miraculously receded to allow Alexander's march past Mount Climax was in all histories of Alexander (Jos. Ant. Jud. ii. 348)Google Scholar, cf. A. i. 26. 2, and obviously found favour with him.

page 208 note 5 A. ii. 7. 6; 12. 5; 14. 8–9; iii. 9. 6; P. 34.

page 208 note 6 Contrast A. ii. 14. 5 with iii. 22. 1; vi. 29, &c.

page 208 note 7 A. i. 12. 1.

page 209 note 1 Ehrenberg, V., Alexander and the Greeks (Oxford, 1938), ch. ii.Google Scholar

page 209 note 2 A. ii. 26. 3; iv. 21. 3; vi. 6. 3; 24. 3.

page 209 note 3 A. i. 18; ii. 17; iii. 9. 1 and 4; but Arrian's own reflections in iii. 10. 3–4 illustrate how Alexander's conduct should not be interpreted, in view of the evidence in 10. 2.

page 209 note 4 A. ii. 16; iii. 3; iv. 28; 30. 4; v. 2; 3. 2; vi. 3. 4–5; 14. 2; vii. 20 (all from Ptolemy or Aristobulus or both). Tarn ii. 45 dismisses A. v. 2 as a mere logos of the inferior tradition, but wrongly; the first section in oratio recta guarantees what follows down to section 7 in oratio obliqua as coming from one or both of the main sources (cf. ii. 12. 3–6 for their account in the form of a logos in oratio obliqua); in section 7 a change of source is explicit.

page 209 note 5 Tarn, ii. 51 ffGoogle Scholar. wrongly ascribing the tradition to Clitarchus.

page 209 note 6 A. vi. 24. 2 f., cf. Strabo, xv. 1. 5Google Scholar. On the Gedrosian march cf. Strasburger, H., Hermes lxxx (1952), 456 ffGoogle Scholar. A. vi. 21. 3–22. 3; 23. 1–24. 1; 27. 1 come from an official, apologetic source (presumably Ptolemy) which rationalized Alexander's motives and minimized the disaster; 22. 4–8 from Aristobulus, and 24. 1–26. 5 either from him or, as Strasburger argues, from Nearchus, a reliable source whichever view be adopted, whose account agreed with all others and with modern travellers' descriptions of the desert; Strasburger reckons that Alexander lost three-fourths of the army that went with him.

page 210 note 1 Strabo, xvii. 1. 43 (Callisthenes)Google Scholar, cf. Tarn, ii. 353 ff.Google Scholar

page 210 note 2 Tarn, 's objections (ii. 348 ff.)Google Scholar cannot stand against the texts of Pindar he cites and Hdt. ii. 42; 55. A Greek could not be certain of the true name of Zeus, cf. Aesch. Agam. 160 ff.Google Scholar

page 210 note 3 P. 33.

page 210 note 4 Strabo, xvii. I. 43.Google Scholar

page 210 note 5 Balsdon, J. P. V. D., Historia i (1950), 353 ff.Google Scholar

page 210 note 6 See esp. Dinarch, . i. 94Google Scholar; Hyper, , contra Dem. 31Google Scholar; epitaphios 21Google Scholar (on which cf. Bickermann, E., Athenaeum xli (1963), 70 ff.Google Scholar; in my view the present ἀναγκαόμεθα relates not to Athens, but to Greece generally, or rather cities not yet freed).

page 211 note 1 Bickermann, E., CPh. xlv (1950), 43 (review of Tarn).Google Scholar

page 211 note 2 A. v. 3. 1.

page 211 note 3 A. vii. 20. 1; Strabo, xvi. 1. 11Google Scholar; cf. Pearson, L., Lost Histories of Alexander the Great (New York, 1960), 184.Google Scholar

page 211 note 4 Diels, , Fragm. d. Vorsokratiker 16 B 114.Google Scholar

page 211 note 5 μεταλλάττειν, OGIS 4; D. xviii 56. 2.

page 211 note 6 D. xviii. 60–61; Plut. Eumenes 13.Google Scholar

page 211 note 7 Suet. Caes. 88.Google Scholar

page 212 note 1 A. vi. 15. 5; 17. 1–2, &c.

page 212 note 2 Persian rule had once extended to the Indus (Hdt. iv. 44; A. Ind. 1), not beyond; nor in Alexander's time so far (Strabo, xv. 1. 26)Google Scholar; even the Indus country was no longer known, A. vi. 1; Ind. 20; 32.

page 212 note 3 A. iv. 15. 5–6; v. 26 (but the reliability of this speech is called in grave doubt by Kienast, D., Historia xiv (1965), 180 ff.).Google Scholar

page 212 note 4 Thomson, J. O., Hist, of Anc. Geography (Cambridge, 1948), 135.Google Scholar

page 212 note 5 A. v. 29. 4–5; C. x. 1. 21; D. xviii. 3. 2; 39. 6; xix. 14. 8.

page 212 note 6 A. vii. 8. 1.

page 212 note 7 A. vii. 16, cf. iv. 15.

page 212 note 8 A. vii. 19. 3 ff., cf. Strabo, xvi. 1. 11.Google Scholar

page 212 note 9 D. xviii. 4; C. x. 1. 17–19. Tarn's criticisms are answered by Schachermeyr, F., Jahreshefte der österr. arch. Inst. (1954), 118 ff.Google Scholar

page 212 note 10 A. iv. 7. 5; vii. 1. 4.

page 213 note 1 Thomson, , op. cit. 139 ff.Google Scholar

page 213 note 2 Perdiccas conquered Cappadocia after Alexander's death (D. xviii. 16); Armenia remained unsubdued.

page 213 note 3 Badian, E., JHS lxxxi (1961), 16 ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 213 note 4 A. Ind. 40. 7–8 (Nearchus). For the motive cf. Tac. Agr. 21.Google Scholar

page 213 note 5 A. iii. 1. 5 (cf. P. 26);iv. 25. 4; vi. 15.2:21. 5; vii. 21; Strabo, ix. 2. 18Google Scholar; xvi. 1. 9–11.

page 213 note 6 Jones, (op. cit. in n. 5, p. 206)Google Scholar, ch. 1. Native towns, e.g. A. ii. 27. 7; iv. 28. 4.

page 213 note 7 Hdt. i. 146.

page 213 note 8 Tod 138 (Caria); Olmstead, A. T., Hist, of the Persian Empire (Chicago, 1948), 348–50Google Scholar; 360; 391–2; 405–6 (Lycia).

page 213 note 9 D. xvii. 67. 1; P. 47. 3 (cf. A. vii. 12). For Alexander's culture see P. 4. 1 and 6; 7–8; 10. 4; 11. 6 (= A. i. 9. 10); 26. 1; 29. 1–3 (cf. A. iii. 6. 1); A. i. 12. 1, &c.

page 214 note 1 Badian, E., Historia vii (1958), 440 ff.Google Scholar

page 214 note 2 Badian, , op. cit. 425 ff.Google Scholar; Merlan, P., CPh. xlv (1950), 161 ff.Google Scholar

page 214 note 3 A. vii. 11. 8–9; Plut. Mor. 329.

page 214 note 4 A. vii. 12.

page 214 note 5 A. iv. 19; vii. 4.

page 214 note 6 A. vii. 6; 11; 23.

page 214 note 7 D. xviii. 7.

page 214 note 8 e.g. Alexander the Lyncestian, Leonnatus, and Perdiccas (cf. Berve's biographies); see also A. iv. 13. 1.

page 215 note 1 D. xvii. 16.

page 215 note 2 P. 329.

page 215 note 3 Pliny, , NH iii. 39.Google Scholar