Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T23:27:50.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Virtue of Civil Society*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2014

Edward Shils
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

SINCE MONTESQUIEU, WRITERS ON POLITICS HAVE BEEN aware that there might be an association of particular moral qualities and beliefs with particular political regimes. The association between virtue and republican governments, although duly recorded by students of Montesquieu's thought, has however been passed over. The disposition to participate in politics, the sense of political potency or impotence, certain traits of personality such as could be summarized in the term ‘authoritarian personality’, etc., have all been studied by theorists of democracy. Virtue, or public spirit or civility, has been neglected.

I would like to take up Montesquieu's theme once more. I wish to enquire into the place of virtue or what I call civility in the liberal democratic order, which Montesquieu referred to as the republican type of government. Latterly the term ‘civil society’ has come to be used very loosely as equivalent to ‘liberal democratic society’. They are not entirely the same and the difference between them is significant. In civility lies the difference between a well-ordered and a disordered liberal democracy.

Type
Articles
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , 01 January 1991 , pp. 3 - 20
Copyright
Copyright © Government and Opposition Ltd 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Weber, Max, Zur Neuordnung Deutschlands: Schriften und Reden 1918–1920. Gesamiausgabe, Tübingen, J. C. B. Mohr, 1988, Abt I, Band 16, p. 553 Google Scholar.

2 Schumpeter, Joseph, Capitatism, Socialism and Democracy, London, Allen & Unwin, 1943, pp. 269–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Montesquieu, , de l’Esprit des lois (Oeuvres), Paris, Dalibon, 1822, II, pp. 213–14Google Scholar.

4 Encounter, XLI, 1 July 1973, pp. 31–43.

5 Weber, Max, Politik als Beruf, Munich, Leipzig, Duncker & Humblot 1919, pp. 48ff Google Scholar.

6 Weber, Max, Zur Politik im Weltkrieg, Schriften und Reden, 1914–1918. Gesamtausgabe, Tübingen, J. C. B. Mohr, 1984, Abt I, Band 5, pp. 421–596 Google Scholar.