1 For example the Socialist International set up in 1972 a special working party on international terrorism and its implications for social democrats. Pugwash, at its meeting in Oxford last September, discussed on the initiative of H. Alfven (Sweden), the question of scientific work on the combating of terrorism. And the subject was raised in the general section of the British Association Conference in the same week.

2 See, for example, the strongly worded leading article in The Times, 23 December 1972.

3 Proceedings of the General Assembly, 19 December 1972. The Study Committee proposal was incorporated in a resolution which also condemned ‘the continuation of repressive and terrorist acts by colonial racist and alien regimes in denying peoples their legitimate right to self‐determination and independence and other human rights and fundamental freedom’. The voting was seventy‐six in favour, thirty‐five against (including Britain and the USA), with seventeen abstentions.

4 Fanon, Frantz, The Wretched of the Earth, Penguin, Harmondsworth, 1967, PP. 127 ff.Google Scholar

5 There are a number of sources for these data: David Wood in his Conflict in the Twentieth Century: Adelphi Paper No. 48, June 1968, estimates that in the period 1945–65 there were fifty‐five internal wars compared to twenty in the years 1919–39; McNamara's, Robert, The Essence of Security, Harper and Row, New York, 1968,Google Scholar asserts that only fifteen of the 164 major outbreaks of violence between 1958–66 constituted inter‐state conflicts. Nor is the increasing incidence confined to Third World countries. Robert Moss gives figures of 214 killed and over nine thousand injured as a result of acts of political terrorism in the USA in the years 1965–68. He cites the Scanlan's Magazine figures for the incidence of acts of sabotage and terrorism in the USA: 1965 – 16; 1968 – 236; 1970 – 546; viz. Moss, Robert, Urban Guerrillas, Temple Smith, London, 1972, pp. 67–74.Google Scholar

6 Bull, Hedley, ‘Civil Violence and International Order’ in Adelphi Paper No. 83, 12 1971, pp. 27–36.Google Scholar

7 Trochu, Louis, Oeuvres posthumes, Vol. 1, Tours, 1896, p. 511.Google Scholar

8 Kiernan, V. G., The Lords of Human Kind, Penguin, Harmondsworth, 1972, P. 233.Google Scholar

9 Quoted in Davies, Lord, Force, Constable, London 1934, p. 165.Google ScholarPubMed

10 Churchill, Winston S., The World Crisis: The Aftermath, pp. 451–4.Google Scholar

11 Report of the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, 1972.

12 Report from Peter Deeley in The Observer, 9 July 1972.

13 Niccolo Machiavelli, The History of Florence, Book II, Chap. 34.

14 Chapman, Brian, The Police State, Pall Mall, London, 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

15 See Lewin, M., Russian Peasants and Soviet Power, Allen and Unwin, London, 1968, PP. 446–517.Google Scholar

16 For a guide to French military thinking on counter‐revolutionary measures see Revue Militaire d'Information, Paris, February/March, 1957. Thompson, Sir R., Revolutionary War in World Strategy 1941–69, Secker, London, 1970 Google Scholar, contains a discussion of the applicability of French military doctrine to other terrain. Also Paret, Peter, French Revolutionary Warfare from Indo China to Algeria, London, 1964.Google Scholar

17 Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. W., ‘Politics as a Vocation’, Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, Transl. and Edited with an Introduction by Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. W., Routledge, London, 1947, pp. 77–8.Google Scholar

18 Moss, Robert, Urban Guerrillas, Temple Smith, London, 1972, p. 36.Google Scholar

19 Malraux, André, Le triangle noir, Laclos, Goya, Saint‐Just, Gallimard, Paris, 1970, p. 121.Google Scholar

20 Ibid., p. 123.

21 Quoted in Levytsky, B., The Uses of Terror, Sidgwick and Jackson, London, 1971, PP. 38–9.Google Scholar

22 Malraux, André, La Condition Humaine, Gallimard, Paris, 1946, p. 189.Google Scholar

23 Calvert, Peter, A Study of Revolution, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1970, p. 22.Google Scholar

24 Guevara, Che, Guerrilla Warfare, Penguin, Harmondsworth, 1969, p. 22.Google Scholar

25 Moss, op. cit., p. 64.

26 Guevara, op. cit., p. 26.

27 Debray, Regis, Revolution in the Revolution?, Penguin, Harmondsworth, 1968, P. 74.Google Scholar

28 Quoted in Heilbrunn, O., Partisan Warfare, Allen & Unwin, London, 1962, p. 38.Google Scholar

29 See the useful analysis by Moss, op. cit., pp. 211–25.

30 Report in The Times, 19 October 1972.

31 Report in The Times, 30 November 1972.

32 Calvert, op. cit., p. 176.

33 For the distinction between feud sanctions and legal sanctions see Poposil, L., Kapauku Papuans and their Law, Yale University Press, 1958.Google Scholar

34 Paul, Leslie, The Age of Terror, Faber, London, 1950, p. 213.Google Scholar

35 Quoted in Avrich, Paul, The Russian Anarchists, Princeton University Press, 1964, p. 48.Google Scholar

36 Ibid., p. 48.

37 Joll, James, The Anarchists, Eyre and Spottiswoode, London, 1964, p. 118.Google Scholar

38 Hobsbawm, E. ‘The Andalusian Anarchists’ in Primitive Rebels, Manchester University Press, 1959.Google Scholar

39 James Joll, op. cit., p. 128.

40 ‘Civil Violence and the International System’, Parts I and II, Adelphi Papers Nos. 82 and 83, International Institute for Strategic Studies, London, 1971.

41 Calvert, op. cit., p. 21.

42 Excerpt from speech by Himmler to his SS Obergruppenführers at Posen, 4 October 1943, Documents in Evidence, Nuremberg, 1947–49, Document number 1, 919‐PS.

43 For example Frantz Fanon, op. cit., and Marighela, For the Liberation of Brazil, translated by John Butt and Rosemary Sheed, Penguin, Harmondsworth, 1971.

44 Blake, G., ‘The Wandering Arabs’, Geographical Magazine, Vol. XLV, No. 3, 12 1972, pp. 179–82.Google Scholar

45 Blake, op. cit., p. 180.