Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:12:09.582Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Terrorism Studies: What We Have Forgotten and What We Now Know’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2018

Caroline Kennedy-Pipe
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In our current troubled times, terrorism and the threat of attacks on liberal states preoccupies both policymakers and much of the scholarly community. Four important books are reviewed here. These works represent the evolution of thinking on terrorism over the last three turbulent decades. Revisiting earlier thinking and bringing debates up to date about how to understand and respond to violent threats allows us to ponder what we ‘now know’ and may not know about terrorism and liberal states.

Keywords

al-QuaedadronesIRAliberalismradicalizationterrorism
Type
Review Article
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 53 , Issue 2 , April 2018 , pp. 356 - 384
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s). Published by Government and Opposition Limited and Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Caroline Kennedy-Pipe is Professor of International Studies and International Security at the University of Loughborough. Contact email: [email protected].

References

REFERENCES

Ashraf, M.A. (2011), ‘Al Qaeda’s Ideology through Political Myth and Rhetoric’, unpublished PhD thesis (St Andrews University).Google Scholar
Blair, T. (1999), ‘Doctrine of the International Community’, speech in Chicago, 24 April, http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.number10.gov.uk/Page1297.Google Scholar
Boyes, R. (2016), ‘Does Terrorism Work? A History by Richard English’, Sunday Times, 30 July.Google Scholar
Canovan, M. (1996), Nationhood and Political Theory (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).Google Scholar
Carothers, T. (1991), In the Name of Democracy: US Policy Towards Latin America in the Reagan Years (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991).Google Scholar
CNN (2003), ‘Bush Makes Historic Speech aboard Warship’, 2 May, http://edition.cnn.com/2003/US/05/01/bush.transcript.Google Scholar
Connolly, W.F. (1974), The Terms of Political Discourse (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Dingli, S. (2015), ‘We Need to Talk about Silence: Re-examining Silence in International Relations Theory’, European Journal of Politics and International Relations, 21(4): 721–742.Google Scholar
Dodd, V. and Norton-Taylor, R. (2005), ‘Mohammed Sidique Khan Video of 7/7 Ringleader Blames Foreign Policy’, The Guardian, 2 September, www.theguardian.com/uk/2005/sep/02/alqaida.politics.Google Scholar
Duffield, M. (2001), Global Governance and the New Wars (London: Zed Books).Google Scholar
English, R. (2016), Does Terrorism Work? A History (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Fanon, F. (1967), The Wretched of the Earth (New York: Grove Weidenfeld).Google Scholar
Freeden, M. (2005), ‘What Should Be “Political” in Political Theory?’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 13(2): 113–134.Google Scholar
Gaddis, J.L. (1998), We Now Know: Rethinking Cold War History (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Gaddis, J.L. (2005), Surprise: Security and the American Experience (New Haven: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Gordon, M.R. (1990), ‘Bush Sends US Forces to Saudi Arabia as Kingdom Agrees to Confront Iraq’, New York Times, 1 August.Google Scholar
Grainger, J.H. (2005), Tony Blair and the Ideal Type (Exeter: Imprint Academic).Google Scholar
Grayling, A.C. (2006), Among the Dead Cities: Is the Targeting of Civilians in War Ever Justified? (London: Bloomsbury).Google Scholar
The Guardian (2016a), ‘US Had Extensive Contact with Ayatollah Khomeini before Iran Revolution’, 10 June 2016.Google Scholar
The Guardian (2016b), ‘The Attacks in France Show that its Colonial Past Endures’, 22 July.Google Scholar
The Guardian (2017), ‘Anwar al-Awlaki’s Daughter Nawar Killed in Yemen Raid Approved by Trump’, 1 February.Google Scholar
Guess, R. (2008), Philosophy and Real Politics (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Hersch, S. (2015), ‘The Killing of Osama bin Laden’, London Review of Books, May.Google Scholar
Hoffman., B. (1999), ‘Terrorism Trends and Prospects’, in I.O. Lesser et al. (eds), Countering the New Terrorism (New York: Rand Corporation): 7–38.Google Scholar
Horgan, J. and Boyle, M.J. (2008), ‘Symposium: Critical Terrorism Studies: Foundations, Issues, Challenges’, Critical Studies in Terrorism, 1(1): 51–64.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch (2002), ‘Fatally Flawed: Cluster Bombs and their Use by the United States in Afghanistan’, report, 18 December, www.hrw.org/report/2002/12/18/fatally-flawed/cluster-bombs-and-their-use-united-states-afghanistan.Google Scholar
Ignatieff, M. (2000), Virtual War: Kosovo and Beyond (London: Picador).Google Scholar
The Independent (2015), ‘The Attacks in France and the French Algerian War: France’s Unresolved Algerian War Sheds Light on the Paris Attack’, 16 November.Google Scholar
Ingram, H.J. and Whiteside, C. (2017), ‘The Yemen Raid and the Ghost of Anwar al-Awlaki: The Enduring Propaganda Value of a Martyr’, The Atlantic, 9 February.Google Scholar
Jackson, R. (2008), ‘The Ghosts of State Terror: Knowledge, Politics and Terrorism Studies’, Critical Studies on Terrorism, 1(3): 377–392.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. (2000), Blowback: The Costs and Consequences of American Empire (London: Little, Brown).Google Scholar
Kaldor, M. (1999), New and Old Wars: Organised Violence in a Global Era (London: Polity).Google Scholar
Kaldor, M. (2003), ‘Terrorism as Regressive Globalisation’, Open Democracy, 25 September, www.opendemocracy.net/democracy-americanpower/article_1501.jsp.Google Scholar
Knowlton, B. and International Herald Tribune (2001a), ‘The US and UK Bomb Targets in Afghanistan: Bush, “Battle Joined”’, New York Times, 8 October.Google Scholar
Knowlton, B. and International Herald Tribune (2001b), ‘Terror in America: “We’re Going to Smoke Them Out”: President Airs his Anger’, New York Times, 19 September.Google Scholar
Kramer, M. (2003), ‘The Collapse of the Soviet Union (Part 1)’, Journal of Cold War Studies, 5(1): (special issue).Google Scholar
Lewis, M.E. (2013), ‘Drones: Actually the Most Humane Form of Warfare Ever. How Better Targeting and Surveillance Can Reduce the Number of Civilian Casualties’, The Atlantic, 21 August.Google Scholar
McDonald, A. (2008), Depleted Uranium Weapons and International Law: A Precautionary Approach (The Hague: TMC Asser Press).Google Scholar
Mueller, J.E. (1989), Retreat from Doomsday: The Obsolescence of Major War (New York: Basic Books).Google Scholar
Mueller, J.E. (1997), Quiet Cataclysm: Reflections on the Recent Transformation of World Politics (London: Longman).Google Scholar
Nagel, T. (2016), ‘By Any Means or None’, London Review of Books, September.Google Scholar
Newman, E. (2004), ‘The “New Wars” Debate: A Historical Perspective is Needed’, Security Dialogue, 35(2): 173–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Sullivan, N.K. (1986) (ed.), Terrorism, Ideology and Revolution: The Origins of Modern Political Violence (Brighton: Wheatsheaf).Google Scholar
O’Sullivan, N.K. (1997), ‘Difference and the Concept of the Political in Contemporary Political Philosophy’, Political Studies, 445(4): 739–754.Google Scholar
O’Sullivan, N.K. (2014), The Concept of the Political in Contemporary Western and Non-Western Political Thought, Heidelberg Paper in South Asian and Comparative Politics: Working Paper 73.Google Scholar
Pickard, J. (2017), ‘Corbyn Links Terror Attacks to Foreign Wars’, Financial Times, 25 May, www.ft.com/content/b249730a-4170-11e7-82b6-896b95f30f58.Google Scholar
Ranstorp, M. (2009), ‘Mapping Terrorism Studies after 9/11: An Academic Field of Old Problems and New Prospects’, in R. Jackson, M. Breen Smyth and J. Gunning (eds), Critical Terrorism Studies (London: Routledge): 13–33.Google Scholar
Rengger, N. (2013), Just War and International Order: The Uncivil Condition in World Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Runciman, D. (2006), The Politics of Good Intentions: History, Fear and Hypocrisy in the New World Order (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Scahill, J. and the staff of The Intercept (2016), The Assassination Complex (New York: Barnes & Noble, 2016).Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. (2006), The Nomos of the Earth: In the International Law of the Jus Publicum Europeaeum’, transl. G.L. Ulmen (New York: Telos).Google Scholar
Shane, S. (2015), Objective Troy: A Terrorist, a President, and the Rise of the Drone (New York: Tim Duggan Books).Google Scholar
Silke, A. (2006), ‘The Impact of 9/11 on Research on Terrorism’, in M. Ranstorp (ed.), Managing Terrorism Research: State of the Art, Gaps and Future Direction (London: Routledge): 175–193.Google Scholar
Sloan, E.E. (2002), The Revolution in Military Affairs: More Proportionate Ways of Conducting Military Affairs (Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press).Google Scholar
Sluke, J.A. (2009), ‘The Contribution of Anthropology to Critical Terrorism Studies’, in R. Jackson, M. Breen Smyth and J. Gunning (eds), Critical Terrorism Studies (London: Routledge): 138–155.Google Scholar
Spinner, J. and Vick, K. (2004), ‘Battle for Fallujah’, Washington Post, 9 November.Google Scholar
Tanenhaus, S. (2006), ‘The Education of Richard Hofstadter’, New York Times, 6 August.Google Scholar
Truman, H.S. (1965), Memoirs: Years of Decision (Garden City, NJ: Doubleday).Google Scholar
Ucko, D.H. (2014), ‘Critics Gone Wild: Counterinsurgency as the Root of All Evil’, Small Wars and Insurgencies, 25(1): 161–179.Google Scholar
Wakefield, M. (2016), ‘How Do Schoolgirls Fall for Jihadis? The Same Way they Fell for Justin Bieber’, The Spectator, March 2016.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, P. (1977), Terrorism and the Liberal State (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
Zenko, M. (2015), ‘What Obama Really Meant by “No Boots on the Ground”’, The Atlantic, 3 December.Google Scholar