Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T05:37:48.132Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Separate and Rule - the Emerging Judicial Power in France

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2014

Jack Hayward
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , 01 January 1985 , pp. 104 - 117
Copyright
Copyright © Government and Opposition Ltd 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Quermonne makes excellent use of the article by Burdeau, Georges, ‘La conception du pouvoir selon la Constitution française du 4 octobre 1958’, Revue Française de Science Politique, 03 1959, pp. 87 et seq CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Extracts from the 31 January 1964 press conference, form number 4 of the 16 ‘political documents’ appended to Quermonne’s book. The quotations appear on p. 647.

3 See the text of Giscard d’Estaing’s address to the Constitutional Council of 8 November 1977 in Quermonne, Document 12, pp. 676–8.

4 On this debate see Nicolet, Claude, L’idée républicaine en France, Paris, Gallimard, 1982, pp. 349–61Google Scholar.

5 Burdeau, op. cit., p. 98.

6 Philip, Lofe, ‘Le développernent du contrǒle de constitutionnalité et l’accrois‐sement des pouvoirs du juge constitutionnel’, Revue du Droit Public, 1983, No. 2, p. 402 Google Scholar; cf. 411 note.

6 Ibid., p. 413.

7 Ibid., p. 417. More generally, see issue 13, 1980 of the review Pouvoirs devoted to ‘Le Conseil Constitutionnel’.