Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:47:58.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rethinking the Decentralization of Legislative Organization and its Implications for Policymaking: Evidence from Taiwan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2020

Isaac Shih-hao Huang Open the ORCID record for Isaac Shih-hao Huang [Opens in a new window]  and
Shing-yuan Sheng Open the ORCID record for Shing-yuan Sheng [Opens in a new window]
Isaac Shih-hao Huang*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan
Shing-yuan Sheng
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It can be challenging for a democratic government to effectively make policies that address crucial national problems. While a bulk of literature reports that many democracies have overcome this challenge through centralization of legislative organization, few studies have explained why legislative decentralization that allegedly impairs policymaking performance would take place. Drawing on Taiwan's experience and over 13,000 legislative bills proposed in Taiwan's parliament between 1993 and 2012, this article demonstrates that the legislative decentralization during the onset of Taiwan's democratization slightly revived the policymaking performance of a near-paralysed parliament. Like drinking poison to quench the thirst, myopic politicians may opt for legislative decentralization as an instant remedy to ease severe legislative obstruction, despite the unfavourable consequences that the resulting decentralized legislative organization may eventually bring about. These findings shed new light on the evolution of legislative organization and account for the difficulties in policymaking facing developing democracies.

Keywords

legislative organizationlegislative decentralizationgovernmentmajority partypolicymakingTaiwan
Type
Article
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 57 , Issue 2 , April 2022 , pp. 318 - 335
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Government and Opposition Limited

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Batto, N, Tsai, Y-C and Weng, T-W (2016) Parliamentary Brawls, Media Coverage, and Re-Election in Taiwan. Paper presented at the 2016 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, 1–4 September.Google Scholar
Binder, S (1996) The Partisan Basis of Procedural Choice: Allocating Parliamentary Rights in the House, 1789–1990. American Political Science Review 90(1), 8–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunner, M (2013) Parliaments and Legislative Activity: Motivation for Bill Introduction. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casar, MA (2002) Executive-Legislative Relations: The Case of Mexico (1946–1997). In Morgenstern, S and Nacif, B (eds), Legislative Politics in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 114–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, M-T (1996) Local Factions and Elections in Taiwan's Democratisation. In Tien, H-M (ed.), Taiwan's Electoral Politics and Democratic Transition: Riding the Third Wave. Armonk: M. E. Sharpe, pp. 174–192.Google Scholar
Cho, K (2016) Legislative Impact Assessment at the National Assembly of the Republic of Korea. Presentation at IFLAPARL Pre-Conference, Washington, DC, 10–12 August, www.ifla.org/files/assets/services-for-parliaments/preconference/2016/cho_presentation.pdf (accessed 28 July 2020).Google Scholar
Christiansen, FJ and Damgaard, (2008) Parliamentary Opposition under Minority Parliamentarism: Scandinavia. Journal of Legislative Studies 14(1–2), 46–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiansen, FJ and Seeberg, HB (2016) Cooperation between Counterparts in Parliament from an Agenda-Setting Perspective: Legislative Coalitions as a Trade of Criticism and Policy. West European Politics 39(6), 1160–1180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, G (1987) The Efficient Secret: The Cabinet and the Development of Political Parties in Victorian England. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, G (2006) The Organization of Democratic Legislatures. In Weingast, B and Wittman, D (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Political Economy. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 141–161.Google Scholar
Cox, G and McCubbins, M (1993) Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cox, G and McCubbins, M (2005) Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U. S. House of Representatives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Döring, H (1993) Parliaments, Public Choice and Legislation. Paper presented at the Project Conference, Heidelberg, 12 November.Google Scholar
Fell, D (2005) Party Politics in Taiwan: Party Change and the Democratic Evolution of Taiwan, 1991–2004. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Field, B (2016) Why Minority Governments Work: Multilevel Territorial Politics in Spain. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figueiredo, AC and Limongi, F (2000) Presidential Power, Legislative Organization, and Party Behavior in Brazil. Comparative Politics 32(2), 151–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, R, Hoare, J, Köllner, P and Pares, S (eds) (2013) Korea 2013: Politics, Economy and Society. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, A and Hill, J (2007) Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hedlund, R (1984) Organizational Attributes of Legislative Institutions: Structure, Rules, Norms, Resources. In Loewenberg, G, Patterson, S and Jewell, M (eds), Handbook of Legislative Research. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, pp. 321–391.Google Scholar
Hedlund, R and Freeman, P (1981) A Strategy for Measuring the Performance of Legislatures in Processing Decisions. Legislative Studies Quarterly 6(1), 87–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hibbing, J and Theiss-Morse, E (1995) Congress as Public Enemy: Public Attitudes Toward American Political Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicken, A and Stoll, H (2017) Legislative Policy-Making Authority, Party System Size, and Party System Nationalization. Electoral Studies 47, 113–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, S-Y (1986) Legislative Politics of the Republic of China: 1970–1984. PhD dissertation, University of California.Google Scholar
Horowitz, D (2014) Ethnic Power Sharing: Three Big Problems. Journal of Democracy 25(2), 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, S-H (2019) How Parliamentary Negotiation Affects Policy-making: Evidence from Taiwan. Parliamentary Affairs 72(3), 702–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J and Kim, S (2016) A Study on the Effect of the 2012 National Assembly Act Amendment. KDI Research Monograph Paper 2015-03, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2799088 (accessed 4 August 2020).Google Scholar
Kingdon, J (1995) Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Krehbiel, K (1991) Information and Legislative Organization. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebo, M, McGlynn, A and Koger, G (2007) Strategic Party Government: Party Influence in Congress, 1789–2000. American Journal of Political Science 51(3), 464–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, A (1969) Consociational Democracy. World Politics 21(2), 207–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, A (1999) Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lo, C-H (2006) Meeting Management and Legal Regulations. Taipei: Wunan (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Maas, C and Hox, J (2005) Sufficient Sample Sizes for Multilevel Modelling. Methodology 1(3), 86–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malesky, E and Schuler, P (2010) Nodding or Needling: Analyzing Delegate Responsiveness in an Authoritarian Parliament. American Political Science Review 104(3), 482–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattson, I (1995) Private Members’ Initiatives and Amendments. In Döring, H (ed.), Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe. Frankfurt: Campus, pp. 448–487.Google Scholar
McCubbins, M and Noble, G (1995) The Appearance of Power: Legislators, Bureaucrats, and the Budget Process in the United States and Japan. In Cowhey, P and McCubbins, M (eds), Structure and Policy in Japan and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 56–80.Google Scholar
McCulloch, A (2018) The Use and Abuse of Veto Rights in Power-Sharing Systems: Northern Ireland's Petition of Concern in Comparative Perspective. Government and Opposition: An International Journal of Comparative Politics 53(4), 735–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishler, W and Rose, R (1994) Support for Parliaments and Regimes in the Transition toward Democracy in Eastern Europe. Legislative Studies Quarterly 19(1), 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nalepa, M (2016) Party Institutionalization and Legislative Organization: The Evolution of Agenda Power in the Polish Parliament. Journal of Comparative Politics 48(3), 353–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, D (1994) Democratic Legislative Institutions: A Comparative View. Armonk: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Paccagnella, O (2011) Sample Size and Accuracy of Estimates in Multilevel Models: New Simulation Results. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioural and Social Sciences 7(3), 111–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parliamentary Library (2015) Legislative Yuan Database. https://npl.ly.gov.tw/do/www/dbMaintainNew?dbKind=%E7%AB%8B%E6%B3%95%E9%99%A2%E6%99%BA%E5%BA%AB (accessed 04 August 2020).Google Scholar
Rasch, BE (2011) Institutionally Weak Governments and Parliamentary Voting on Bills. In Rasch, BE and Tsebelis, G (eds), The Role of Governments in Legislative Agenda Setting. New York: Routledge, pp. 234–253.Google Scholar
Schickler, E (2001) Disjointed Pluralism: Institutional Innovation and the Development of the U.S. Congress. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sheng, S-Y (1996) Electoral Competition and Legislative Participation: The Case of Taiwan. PhD dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Sheng, S-Y (2003) The Influence of the Legislative Branch and the Executive Branch in the Process of Law-making: A Comparison of the Unified and Divided Governments. Taiwan Political Science Review 7(2), 51–105 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Sheng, S-Y (2008) Party Leadership and Cohesion in the Legislative Yuan: Before and After the First Party Turnover in the Executive Branch. Taiwan Democracy Quarterly 5(4), 1–46 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Sheng, S-Y (2014) Revisiting Constituency Service and Legislative Work of Taiwan's Legislators: A Comparison Before and After the Reform of Electoral System. Soochow Journal of Political Science 32(2), 65–116 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Sheng, S-Y and Huang, S-H (2006) Why Does the Taiwanese Public Hate the Legislative Yuan? Taiwan Democracy Quarterly 3(3), 85–128 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Shepsle, K and Weingast, B (1981) Structure-induced Equilibrium and Legislative Choice. Public Choice 37(3), 503–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snijders, T and Bosker, R (1999) Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modelling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Strøm, K (1998) Parliamentary Committees in European Democracies. Journal of Legislative Studies 4(1), 21–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsai, Y-C (2009) The Strategies and Operations of Small Parties in Parliament. PhD dissertation, National Chengchi University (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Tsebelis, G (1995) Decision Making in Political Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicameralism and Multipartism. British Journal of Political Science 25(3), 289–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walgrave, S, Soroka, S and Nuytemans, M (2008) The Mass Media's Political Agenda Setting Power: A Longitudinal Analysis of Media, Parliament, and Government in Belgium (1993 to 2000). Comparative Political Studies 41(6), 814–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, J-P (2003) The Legislative Yuan under a Multiparty System: On the Operation of Party Caucuses in the Legislative Yuan. Legislative Yuan Newsletter 31, 11–21 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Wright, J (2008) Do Authoritarian Institutions Constrain? How Legislatures Affect Economic Growth and Investment. American Journal of Political Science 52(2), 322–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zucchini, F (2011) Italy: Government Alternation and Legislative Agenda Setting. In Rasch, BE and Tsebelis, G (eds), The Role of Governments in Legislative Agenda Setting. New York: Routledge, pp. 53–77.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Huang and Sheng supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Huang and Sheng supplementary material(File)
File 49.4 KB