Hostname: page-component-669899f699-tzmfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T15:56:50.117Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Resisting the Irresistible: ‘Failed Opposition’ in Azerbaijan and Belarus Revisited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 February 2018

Sofie Bedford  and
Laurent Vinatier
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In recent literature on post-Soviet electoral revolutions in places where attempts at regime change through popular protest did not succeed, opposition groups are often simply regarded as ‘failed’. And yet, opposition actors exist and participate in the political life of their country. Building on the Belarusian and Azerbaijani cases, we argue that opposition actors are maintained in a ‘ghetto’, often virtual, tightly managed by the ruling authorities who exert monopolistic control over civic activities. Opposition actors adapt to the restricted conditions – accepting a certain level of dependency. They thus develop various tactics to engage with the outside, striving to reduce the ghetto walls. To this end this article proposes a typology of what we call oppositional ‘resistance models’: electoral, in the media, lobbying and through education. The models highlight what makes ‘opposition’ in authoritarian states and are a step towards a more comprehensive understanding of the phenomenon in this context.

Keywords

oppositionactivismresistance modelsauthoritarianismAzerbaijanBelarus
Type
Articles
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 54 , Issue 4 , October 2019 , pp. 686 - 714
Copyright
© The Author(s). Published by Government and Opposition Limited and Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

Sofie Bedford is currently a Visiting Fellow at the Institute for Human Sciences (IWM), Vienna, Austria and a Researcher at the Institute for Russian and Eurasian Studies, Uppsala University. Contact email: [email protected].

Laurent Vinatier is a Researcher at the Institute for Russian and Eurasian Studies, Uppsala University. Contact email: [email protected].

References

REFERENCES

Albrecht, H. (2005), ‘How Can Opposition Support Authoritarianism? Lessons from Egypt’, Democratization, 12(3): 378–397.Google Scholar
Alieva, L. (2006), ‘Azerbaijan’s Frustrating Elections’, Journal of Democracy, 17(2): 147–160.Google Scholar
Alieva, L. (2013), ‘The Characteristics of Political Parties and Elections in Post-Soviet Azerbaijan’, in L. Alieva (ed.), The Soviet Legacy 22 Years On: Reversed or Reinforced? (Baku: Centre for National and International Studies): 103–123.Google Scholar
Ambrosio, T. (2014), ‘Beyond the Transition Paradigm: A Research Agenda for Authoritarian Consolidation’, Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization, 22(3): 471–495.Google Scholar
Anderson, L. (1987), ‘Lawless Government and Illegal Opposition: Reflections on the Middle East’, Journal of International Affairs, 40(2): 219–232.Google Scholar
Ash, K. (2015), ‘The Election Trap: The Cycle of Post-Electoral Repression and Opposition Fragmentation in Lukashenko’s Belarus’, Democratization, 22(6): 1–24.Google Scholar
Bedford, S. (2014), ‘Ideological Hegemony Versus the Perpetual Underdog: Re-Considering Democratic Opposition in Azerbaijan’, paper presented at the Convention for the Association of the Study of Nationalities (ASN), New York, 24–26 April.Google Scholar
Bedford, S. (2015), ‘To Participate or Not to Participate – That is the Question: Electoral Strategies of the Azerbaijani Opposition’, Caucasus Analytical Digest 73, Parliamentary Election in Azerbaijan: 9–12.Google Scholar
Blaydes, L. (2013), ‘Compliance and Resistance in Iraq under Saddam Hussein: Evidence from the Files of the Ba ‘th Party’, Stanford Comparative Politics Workshop, March.Google Scholar
Blondel, J. (1997), ‘Political Opposition in the Contemporary World’, Government and Opposition: An International Journal of Comparative Politics, 32(4): 462–486.Google Scholar
Brownlee, J. (2007), Authoritarianism in an Age of Democratization (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Bunce, V. and Wolchik, S. (2011), Defeating Authoritarian Leaders in Post-Communist Countries (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Carothers, T. (2002), ‘The End of the Transition Paradigm’, Journal of Democracy, 13(1): 5–21.Google Scholar
Clem, R. (2011), ‘Going it Alone: Belarus as the Non-European European State’, Eurasian Geography and Economics, 52(6): 780–798.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. (1966), ‘Preface’, in R. Dahl (ed.), Political Opposition in Western Democracies (New Haven: Yale University Press): xiii–xxi.Google Scholar
De Cordier, B. (2014), ‘Islamic Social Activism, Globalization and Social Change: A Case Study of Hajji İlgar İbragimoğlu and the Cüma Ehli in Baku, Azerbaijan’, Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 34(2): 134–151.Google Scholar
Diamond, L. (1994), ‘Rethinking Civil Society: Towards Democratic Consolidation’, Journal of Democracy, 5(3): 4–17.Google Scholar
Eberhardt, A. (2006), ‘Belarus after the 2006 Presidential Election: The Prospects for Democracy’, Polish Quarterly of International Affairs, 2: 3–6.Google Scholar
Ergun, A. (2010), ‘Post-Soviet Political Transformation in Azerbaijan: Political Elite, Civil Society and the Trials of Democratization’, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 7(26): 67–85.Google Scholar
Frear, M. (2014), ‘The Parliamentary Elections in Belarus, September 2012’, Electoral Studies, 33(March): 350–3.Google Scholar
Gandhi, J. and Przeworski, A. (2006), ‘Cooperation, Cooptation, and Rebellion Under Dictatorships’, Economics and Politics, 18(1): 1–26.Google Scholar
Gandhi, J. and Przeworski, A. (2007), ‘Authoritarian Institutions and the Survival of Autocrats’, Comparative Political Studies, 40(11): 115–144.Google Scholar
Gelman, V. (2005), ‘Political Opposition in Russia: A Dying Species?’, Post-Soviet Affairs, 21(3): 226–246.Google Scholar
Gerschewski, J. (2013), ‘The Three Pillars of Stability: Legitimation, Repression, and Co-optation in Autocratic Regimes’, Democratization, 20(1): 13–38.Google Scholar
Greene, K. (2007), Why Dominant Parties Lose: Mexico’s Democratization in Comparative Perspective (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Guliyev, F. (2013), ‘Oil and Regime Stability in Azerbaijan’, Democratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization, 21(1): 113–147.Google Scholar
Habdank-Kołaczkowska, S. (2015), Nations in Transit 2015: Democracy on the Defensive in Europe and Eurasia (New York: Freedom House).Google Scholar
Helms, L. (2008), ‘Studying Parliamentary Opposition in Old and New Democracies: Issues and Perspectives’, Journal of Legislative Studies, 14(1–2): 6–19.Google Scholar
Ionescu, G. and De Madariaga, I. (1968), Opposition: Past and Present of a Political Institution (London: C.A. Watts & Co).Google Scholar
Johnston, H. (2005), ‘Talking the Walk: Speech Acts and Resistance in Authoritarian Regimes’, in C. Davenport, H. Johnston and C. McClurg Mueller (eds), Repression and Mobilization, Vol. 21 (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press): 108–137.Google Scholar
Johnston, H. (2006), ‘“Let’s Get Small”: The Dynamics of (Small) Contention in Repressive States’, Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 11(2): 195–212.Google Scholar
Korosteleva, E. (2009), ‘Was There a Quiet Revolution? Belarus After the 2006 Presidential Election’, Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 25(2–3): 324–346.Google Scholar
Korosteleva, E. (2012), ‘Questioning Democracy Promotion: Belarus’ Response to the “Colour Revolutions”’, Democratization, 19(1): 37–59.Google Scholar
Kubát, M. (2010), Political Opposition in Theory and Central European Practice, Vol. 3 (Frankfurt: Peter Lang).Google Scholar
Kulakevich, T. (2015), ‘Political Parties in Belarus – Do They Really Matter?’, Belarus Digest, 16 June, http://belarusdigest.com/story/political-parties-belarus-do-they-really-matter-22849.Google Scholar
LaPorte, J. (2015), ‘Hidden in Plain Sight: Political Opposition and Hegemonic Authoritarianism in Azerbaijan’, Post-Soviet Affairs, 31(4): 339–366.Google Scholar
Lindberg, S. (2006a), ‘Opposition Parties and Democratisation in Sub-Saharan Africa’, Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 24(1): 123–138.Google Scholar
Lindberg, S. (2006b), ‘Tragic Protest: Why Do Opposition Parties Boycott Elections?’, in A. Schedler (ed.), Electoral Authoritarianism (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner): 203–223.Google Scholar
Lenzi, M. (2002), ‘Lost Civilization: The Thorough Repression of Civil Society in Belarus’, Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization, 10(3): 401–421.Google Scholar
Lust-Okar, E. (2005), Structuring Conflict in the Arab World: Incumbents, Opponents, and Institutions (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Lust-Okar, E. (2009), ‘Competitive Clientelism in the Middle East’, Journal of Democracy, 20(3): 122–135.Google Scholar
Magaloni, B. (2006), Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and its Demise in Mexico (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Magaloni, B. (2008), ‘Credible Power-sharing and the Longevity of Authoritarian Rule’, Comparative Political Studies, 41: 715–741.Google Scholar
Manaev, O. (2014), ‘Media in Post-Soviet Belarus: Between Democratization and Reinforcing Authoritarianism’, Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization, 22(2): 207–229.Google Scholar
Manaev, O., Manayeva, N. and Dzmitry Yuran, D. (2011), ‘More State Than Nation: Lukashenko’s Belarus’, Journal of International Affairs, 65(1): 93–113.Google Scholar
Marples, D. (2006), ‘Color Revolutions: The Belarus Case’, Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 39(3): 351–364.Google Scholar
Marples, D. (2009), ‘Outpost of Tyranny? The Failure of Democratization in Belarus’, Democratization, 16(4): 756–776.Google Scholar
Matonytė, I. and Chulitskaya, T (2012), ‘The Third Sector and Political Communication in Belarus: Highlights on the Topic of Social Policies from the Presidential Campaign 2010’, Lithuanian Annual Strategic Review, 10(1): 235–263.Google Scholar
McAllister, I. and White, S. (2016), ‘Lukashenka and his Voters’, East European Politics and Societies, 30(2): 360–380.Google Scholar
Mehrabov, I. (2016), ‘Azerbaijani Women, Online Mediatized Activism and Offline Mass Mobilization’, Social Sciences, 5(4): 60.Google Scholar
Merkel, W. (2004), ‘Embedded and Defective Democracies’, Democratization, 11(5): 33–58.Google Scholar
Mitchell, L. (2012), The Color Revolutions (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press).Google Scholar
Morse, , , L. (2013) (ed.), ‘Azerbaijan’, in L. Morse (ed.), Europe and Eurasia Media Sustainability Index 2013: The Development of Sustainable Independent Media in Europe and Eurasia (Washington DC: IREX): 146–159.Google Scholar
Morse, Y.L. (2012), ‘The Era of Electoral Authoritarianism’, World Politics, 64(1): 161–198.Google Scholar
Naumov, V. (2014), ‘Social Activism in Post-Communist Countries and New Media: The Case of the Tent Camp Protest Action in Minsk, 2006’, Polish Sociological Review, 187: 291–315.Google Scholar
Navumau, V. (2016), The Belarusian Maidan in 2006: A New Social Movement Approach to the Tent Camp Protest in Minsk (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang GmbH).Google Scholar
Nikolayenko, O. (2015), ‘Youth Movements and Elections in Belarus’, Europe-Asia Studies, 67(3): 468–492.Google Scholar
Ó Beacháin, D. and Polese, A. (2010), The Colour Revolutions in the Former Soviet Republics (Oxford: Routledge).Google Scholar
Padhol, U. and Marples, D. (2011), ‘The 2010 Presidential Election in Belarus’, Problems of Post-Communism, 58(1): 3–16.Google Scholar
Parry, G. (1997), ‘Opposition Questions’, Government and Opposition: An International Journal of Comparative Politics, 32(4): 457–461.Google Scholar
Pearce, K. (2014), ‘Two Can Play at that Game: Social Media Opportunities in Azerbaijan for Government and Opposition’, Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization, 22(1): 39–66.Google Scholar
Pearce, K. (2015), ‘Democratizing Kompromat: The Affordances of Social Media for State-sponsored Harassment’, Information, Communication and Society, 18(10): 1158–1174.Google Scholar
Pearce, K. and Kendzior, S. (2012), ‘Networked Authoritarianism and Social Media in Azerbaijan’, Journal of Communication, 62(2): 283–298.Google Scholar
Protsyk, O. (2006), ‘Moldova’s Dilemmas in Democratizing and Reintegrating Transnistria’, Problems of Post-Communism, 53(4): 29–41.Google Scholar
Roessler, P.G. and Howard, M.M. (2009), ‘Post-Cold War Political Regimes: When do Elections Matter?’, in S. Lindberg (ed.), Democratization by Elections: A New Mode of Transition (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press): 101–127.Google Scholar
Schedler, A. (2006), ‘The Logic of Electoral Authoritarianism’, in A. Schedler (ed.), Electoral Authoritarianism: The Dynamics of Unfree Competition (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner): 1–23.Google Scholar
Schedler, A. (2009), ‘Sources of Competition under Electoral Authoritarianism’, in S. Lindberg (ed.), Democratization by Elections: A New Mode of Transition (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press): 179–201.Google Scholar
Schedler, A. (2013), The Politics of Uncertainty: Sustaining and Subverting Electoral Authoritarianism (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Schwedler, J. (2005), ‘Cop Rock: Protest, Identity, and Dancing Riot Police in Jordan’, Social Movement Studies, 4(2): 155–175.Google Scholar
Schwedler, J. (2012), ‘The Political Geography of Protest in Neoliberal Jordan’, Middle East Critique, 21(3): 259–270.Google Scholar
Silitski, V. (2005), ‘Pre-empting Democracy: The Case of Belarus’, Journal of Democracy, 16(4): 83–97.Google Scholar
Silitski, V. (2010), ‘Survival of the Fittest: Domestic and International Dimensions of the Authoritarian Reaction in the Former Soviet Union Following the Colored Revolutions’, Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 43(4): 339–350.Google Scholar
Silitski, V. and Zaprudnik, J. (2010), The A to Z of Belarus (Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press).Google Scholar
Stepan, A. (1990), ‘On the Tasks of a Democratic Opposition’, Journal of Democracy, 1(2): 41–49.Google Scholar
Stepan, A. (1997), ‘Democratic Opposition and Democratization Theory’, Government and Opposition: An International Journal of Comparative Politics, 32(4): 657–678.Google Scholar
Stewart, S., Klein, M. and Schmitz, A. (2012) (eds), Presidents, Oligarchs and Bureaucrats: Forms of Rule in the Post-Soviet Space (Farnham: Ashgate).Google Scholar
Sultanova, S. (2014), ‘Challenging the Aliyev Regime: Political Opposition in Azerbaijan’, Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization, 22(1): 15–38.Google Scholar
Svåsand, L. (2013), ‘The Concept of Opposition and the Structure of Opposition in Malawi’, Commonwealth and Comparative Politics, 51(3): 306–325.Google Scholar
Turovsky, R. (2015), ‘The Systemic Opposition in Authoritarian Regimes: A Case Study of Russia’s Regions’, in C. Ross (ed.), Systemic and Non-systemic Opposition in the Russian Federation: Civil Society Awakens? (Farnham: Ashgate): 121–140.Google Scholar
Wahman, M. (2013), ‘Att studera, mäta och förklara auktoritär motståndskraft’, Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift, 115(4): 261–273.Google Scholar
Valiyev, A. (2006), ‘Parliamentary Elections in Azerbaijan: A Failed Revolution’, Problems of Post-Communism, 53(3): 17–35.Google Scholar
Weghorst, K. and Lindberg, S. (2011), ‘Effective Opposition Strategies: Collective Goods or Clientelism?’, Democratization, 18(5): 1193–1214.Google Scholar
Weinblum, S. and Brack, N. (2011), ‘“Political Opposition”: Towards a Renewed Research Agenda’, Interdisciplinary Political Studies, 1(1): 69–79.Google Scholar
Wickham, C.R. (2002), Mobilizing Islam: Religion, Activism and Political Change in Egypt (New York: Columbia University Press).Google Scholar