Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:15:32.771Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Problems of Integration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2014

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Government and Opposition Ltd 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Lindberg, L. and Scheingold, S. A., Europe's Would‐Be Polity, Prentice Hall, Engle‐wood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1970 Google Scholar.

2 Nye, J., ‘Comparative Regional Integration‐Concept and Measurement’, International Organisation, Vol. 22, No. 4, 1968 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Hansen, R., ‘Regional Integration. Reflections on a Decade of Theoretical Efforts’, World Politics, Vol. 21, No. 2, 1969, pp. 242–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Haas, E., ‘The Study of Regional Integration. Reflections on the Joy and Anguish of Pre‐theorising,’ International Organisation, Vol. 24, No. 4, 1970 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Ake, C., A Theory of Political Integration, The Dorsey Press, 1967 Google Scholar.

6 Galtung, J., ‘A Structural Theory of Integration’, Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 5, No. 4, 1968 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 C. Ake, ibid., p. 8. Where he discusses empirical indicators of integration. ‘Legitimacy score ‐ the extent to which citizens identify with the state as an embodiment of their interests and therefore concede that it deserves their loyalty and the authority to exercise certain powers over them.’