Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T00:48:10.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Political Realignment in Advanced Industrial Society: From Class‐Based Politics to Quality‐of‐Life Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2014

Ronald Inglehart  and
Jacques‐René Rabier
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Throughout this century, the Marxist Left in Europe has emphasized an economic interpretation of history, with state ownership of the means of production as the key element in their prescription for society. Political polarization is depicted as a direct reflection of social class conflict, with the working class the natural base of support for the Left. This diagnosis has become increasingly out of touch with reality in recent years, which have seen the decline of orthodox Marxist parties in Western Europe and the diminishing credibility of the ideology on which they are based. For as advanced industrial society emerges, economic determinism provides a progressively less adequate analysis of society, and class-based parties and the policies they advocate become less central to politics. Economic development reduces the impact of economic determinism. Though economic factors tend to play a dominant role in the early stages of industrial society, in advanced industrial society their relative importance diminishes; and self-expression, ‘belonging’ and the quality of the physical and social environment become increasingly important.

Type
Articles
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , 01 October 1986 , pp. 456 - 479
Copyright
Copyright © Government and Opposition Ltd 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Aron, Raymond, ‘Fin de l’Age Idéologique?’ in Adorno, Theodore W. and Dires, Walter (eds), Sociologica, Frankfurt, Europäische Verlaganstalt, 1955, pp. 219—33Google Scholar; Daniel Bell, The End of Ideology, Glencoe, Free Press, 1960; Martin Lipset, Seymour, ‘The Changing Class Structure and Contemporary European Polities’, Daedalus 93, Winter 1964, pp. 271—303 Google Scholar; Lane, Robert, ‘The Politics of Consensus in an Age of Affluence’, American Political Science Review, 59, 4, 12 1965, pp. 874—985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Inglehart, Ronald, ‘The Silent revolution in Europe: Intergenerational Change in Post-Industrial Societies’, American Political Science Review, 65, 1971, pp.991—1017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar and The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles Among Western Publics, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1977.

3 See Inglehart, Ronald, ‘Postmaterialism in an Environment of Insecurity’, American Political Science Review, 75, 1981, pp. 880—900 CrossRefGoogle Scholar, for citations of literature published by 1980.

4 For more recent findings see: Baker, Kendall R., Dalton, Russell J. and Hildebrandt, Kai, Germany Transformed, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, 1981 Google Scholar; Flanagan, Scott C., ‘Changing Values in Advanced Industrial Societies: Inglehart’s silent revolution from the perspective of Japanese findings’, Comparative Political Studies, 14, 1982, pp. 403—44CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Van Deth, Jan, ‘The Persistence of Materialist and Postmaterialist Value Orientations’, European Journal of Political Research, 11, 1983, pp. 63—79 CrossRefGoogle Scholar and Politieke Waarden: Een Onderzoek naar Politieke Waardorien-taties in Nederland, Amsterdam, CT Press, 1984; Jagodzinski, Wolfgang, ‘Materialism in Japan reconsidered: toward a synthesis of generational and life-cycle explanations’, American Political Science Review, 77, 1983, pp.925—43CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Stephen F. Szabo (ed.), The Successor Generation: International Perspective of Postwar Europeans, London, Butterworths, 1983; Calista, Donald J., ‘Postmaterialism and value convergence’, Comparative Political Studies’, 16, 1984, pp. 525—55Google Scholar; Lafferty, William M. and Knutsen, Oddbjorn, ‘Postmaterialism in a social democratic state: an analysis of the distinctness and congruity of the Inglehart value syndrome in Norway’, Comparative Political Studies, 17, 1985, pp. 411—30CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Savage, James, ‘Postmaterialism of the Left and Right’, Comparative Political Studies, 17, 1985, pp. 431—52CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ronald Inglehart and Renata Siemienska, “Political values and dissatisfaction in Poland and the West: a comparative analysis’, (forthcoming).

5 Inglehart, Ronald, ‘New Perspectives on value Change’, Comparative Political Studies, 17, 1985a, pp. 485—532 CrossRefGoogle Scholar and ‘Aggregate Stability and individual-level change in mass belief systems: the level of analysis paradox’, American Political Science Review, 79, 1985b, pp. 97–116.

6 Inglehart, Ronald, ‘The changing structure of political cleavages in Western society’, in Dalton, Russell J., Flanagan, Scott C. and Beck, Paul A. (eds), Electoral Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1984, pp. 25—69 Google Scholar; Borre, Ole, ‘Critical electoral change in Scandinavia’ also in Electoral Change … , op. cit., pp. 330—64.Google Scholar

7 Inglehart, Ronald and Klingemann, Hans D., ‘Party identification, ideological preference and the left—right dimension among western publics’, in Budge, Ian et al, (eds), Party Identification and Beyond, New York, Wiley, 1976.Google Scholar

8 Alford, Robert A., Party and Society: The Anglo-American Democracies, Chicago, Rand McNally, 1963.Google Scholar

9 Ronald Inglehart, ‘ Impact on Behavior of Long-Term Predispositions’, paper presented at meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, Amsterdam, July 1986.