No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Case Studies
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Government and Opposition Ltd 1986
References
1 Reagan, Ronald, ‘East‐West Trade Relations and the Soviet Pipeline Sanctions’, Department of state Bulletin , 12 1982, p. 28 Google Scholar.
2 Commission des Communautés Européennes, Communication de la Commission au Conseil Concernant le Gaz Naturel, COM. (84) 583 find, 26 October 1984, p. 6.
3 ibid.
4 ‘The Pipeline Cutoff Throttles Telefunken’, Business Week, 12 July 1982, p. 34.
5 ‘Les Développements Politiques de l’Alliance’, Assemblée de l’Atlantique Nord, November 1983, p. 15.
6 ‘Japan Condemns US Action’, The Times, 3 July 1982, p. 4f.
7 As quoted in Keesing’s Contemporary Archives, 30 April 1982, p. 31458.
8 ‘Oil Output to Recover in 1985’, Petroleum Economist, January 1985, p. 24.
9 ‘Energy Supply in the COMECON — Current Status, Problems and Perspectives’, by Martin Czakainski in Energy Exploration and Exploitation, vol. 3, number 4, 1985, pp. 255–63.
10 See Yakemtchouck, Romain, ‘Transferts de Technologies Sensibles entre l’Est et l’Ouest’, Studia Diplomatica , No. 4, 1984, pp. 415–61Google Scholar, for a history of US East‐West trade policy.
11 Nixon, Richard, La Vraie Cuerre , Paris, Albin Michel, 1980, p. 237 Google Scholar.
12 Huntington, Samuel P., ‘Trade, Technology, and Leverage: Economic Diplomacy’, Foreign Policy , No. 32, Fall 1978, pp. 63–80 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
13 Mastanduno, Michael, ‘Strategies of Economic Containment: US Trade Relations with the Soviet Union’, World Politics , No. 4, 07 1985, pp. 503–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See pp. 516–20 for a discussion of Reagan’s strategy of economic warfare.
14 ‘Secretary Interviewed for U.S. News and World Report’, Department of State Bulletin, December 1982, pp. 19–20.
15 World Politics, p. 519.
16 Paarlberg, Robert L., ‘Lessons of the Grain Embargo’, Foreign Affairs , No. 59, Fall 1980, pp. 144–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
17 Business Week, 2 August 1982, p. 28.
18 Parlement Européen, ‘Rapport sur les relations de la Communauté Européenne avec les Pays à Commerce d’Etat d’Europe de l’Est et le CAEM’, PE 78.596/déf. p. 31.
19 Parlement Européen, ‘La Signification et les Effets des Sanctions Economiques, nottament de l’Embargo Commercial et du Boycottage, sur les Relations Extérieures de la CEE’, PE 76.096/déf.
20 ‘European Alternatives to Importing Soviet Natural Gas’, US General Accounting Office, GAO/ID‐83–31, 16 May 1983, p. 49.
21 Commission des Cornrnunautés Européennes, Communication de la Commission au Conseil Concernant le Gar Naturel, COM (84) 120 final, 13 April 1984, p. 11.
22 Several Reagan Administration officials equally opposed unilateral action as ineffective and detrimental to Atlantic strategic co‐operation. See Root, William A., ‘Trade Controls that Work’, Foreign Policy , No. 56, Fall 1984, pp. 61–80 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
23 Stent, Angela, ‘East‐West Trade and Technology Transfer: The West’s Search for Consensus’, The World Today , 11 1984, p. 459 Google Scholar.
24 Fitchett, Joseph, ‘After Years of Disputes, US, Europe Are Closer on Technology Exports’, International Herald Tribune , 6 02 1985 , p. 1, col. 4 Google Scholar.
25 Gherardi, Sophie, ‘L’Espagne Controlera mieux ses exportations vers les pays de l’Est’, La Tribune de l’Economie , 5 03 1985 , p. 3 Google Scholar.
26 Herblay, Michel, ‘La Logique du Gaz’, L’Expansion , 19 02—4 03 1982 , p. 93 Google Scholar.
27 ‘The Growing Split Between Paris and Washington’, Business Week, 2 August 1982, p. 28.
28 The World Today, p. 458.