Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:32:24.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The International Political Economy of the Communications Revolution: The Case for a Neo‐pluralist Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2014

Peter J. Humphreys
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

THE LAST TWO DECADES HAVE SEEN AN UNPRECEDENTED ‘convergence’ of technological developments in computing, telecommunications and the mass media, an event now referred to collectively as ‘the communications revolution’. At the heart of this revolution lies a Kondratievian cluster of technologies: specifically, the silicon microchip, which has facilitated an increase of several orders of magnitude in information storage and processing capabilities; and advanced telephonic, cable and satellite technologies, which have, again by orders of magnitude, expanded the capacity to transmit information instantaneously. A particular result of the economics of satellite communication is that the costs of accessing data bases and information services have become increasingly unaffected by distance and independent of location. The communications revolution has facilitated development of a world-wide system of computerized financial transactions and has also greatly accelerated globalization of the operations of transnational enterprises engaged in manufacturing, resource exploitation and business service.

Type
Articles
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 25 , Issue 4 , 01 October 1990 , pp. 497 - 518
Copyright
Copyright © Government and Opposition Ltd 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Nikolai Kondratieff was a Russian economist who, writing in the 1920s, identified half-century-long cycles or waves of economic development. Joseph Schumpeter popularized the concept of Kondratiev cycles in the West. Both emphasised the importance of new technologies.

2 de Sola Pool, I., ‘International Aspects of Telecommunications Policy’, in Moss, M. L. (ed.), Telecommunications and Productivity, Reading, Mass., Addison-Wesley, 1981 Google Scholar, Chapter 7.

3 Strange, S., States and Markets, London, Pinter, 1988 Google Scholar, Chapter 5 on ‘The Financial Structure’; Dicken, P., Global Shift: Industrial Change in a Turbulent World, London, Harper & ROW, 1986, pp. 110–14Google Scholar.

4 Snow, M., ‘Telecommunications Literature. A Critical Review of the Economic, Technological and Public Policy Issues’, Telecommunications Policy, 06 1988, p. 153 Google Scholar.

5 Kuwahara, S., The Changing World Information Industry, Paris, Atlantic Institute for International Affairs, 1985, p. 52 Google Scholar.

6 Gill, S. and Law, D., The Global Political Economy: Perspectives, Problems and Policies, New York and London, Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1988, pp. 24–53 Google Scholar.

7 Traber, M. (ed.), The Myth of the Information Revolution, London, Sage, 1986 Google Scholar.

8 Toffler, A., The Third Wave, London, Pan, 1981 Google Scholar.

9 Masuda, Y., ‘Parameters of the Post-Industrial Society: Computopia’, in Forester, T., (ed.), The Information Technology Revolution, Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1985, pp. 620–34Google Scholar.

10 Dizard, W., The Coming Information Age: An Overview of Technology, Economics and Politics, New York, Longman, 1982 Google Scholar.

11 Stonier, T., ‘The Microelectronic Revolution, Soviet Political Structure, and the Future of East/West Relations’, The Political Quarterly, Vol. 54, 1983, pp. 137–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 Of course, Marxist theories address such questions, often with considerable sophistication, but this perspective is not addressed in this short article, which advances instead a neo-pluralist approach.

13 Wallerstein, E., The Capitalist World Economy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1979 Google Scholar.

14 Dicken, Global Shift, pp. 110–14.

15 ibid., pp. 88–9, p. 114.

16 Wilks, S. and Wright, M., ‘States, Sectors and Networks’, in Wilks, S. and Wright, M., (eds), Comparative Government-Industry Relations: Western Europe. United States and Japan, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1987, pp. 275–313 Google Scholar.

17 Lindblom, C., Politics and Markets: The World’s Political-Economic System New York, Basic Books, 1977, in particular pp. 170–88Google Scholar.

18 Dyson, K., ‘European States and the Communications Revolution’, in Dyson, K. and Humphreys, P. (eds), The Politics of the Communication Revolution in Western Europe, London, Frank Cass, 1986, pp. 10–55 Google Scholar.

19 Dicken, Global Shift, op. cit., p. 136.

20 Wilks and Wright, ‘States, Sectors and Networks’, op. cit.

21 ibid.

22 Ohmae, K., Triad Power. The Coming Shape of Global Competition, New York, The Free Press, Macmillan, 1985 Google Scholar.

23 Tunstall, J., Communications Deregulation: The Unleashing of America’s Communications Industry, Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1986 Google Scholar.

24 Hills, J., ‘Foreign Policy and Technology: the Japan-US, Japan-Britain and Japan-EEC Technology Agreements’, Political Studies, XXXI, 1983, pp. 205–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hills, J., Deregulating Telecoms: Competition and Control in the United States, Japan and Britain, London, Frances Pinter, 1986 Google Scholar.

25 Dyson, K. and Humphreys, P., ‘Politics, Markets and Communication Policies’ in Dyson, K. and Humphreys, P., (eds), The Political Economy of Communications: International and European Dimensions, London and New York, Routledge, 1990, p. 12 Google Scholar.

26 Kuwahara, The Changing World Information Industry, p. 60; Hills, ‘Foreign Policy and Technology’, p. 218.

27 Kuwahara, op. cit., pp. 59–60.

28 Hills, op. cit., p. 219.

29 Kuwahara, p. 60.

30 P. Humphreys, ‘The Political Economy of Telecommunications in France’, EPRU Working Paper, 3/90, Government Department, University of Manchester; Ch. 9 in Dyson and Humphreys, The Political Economy of Communications.

31 Kuwahara, p. 61.

32 C. Shearman, ‘European Collaboration in Computing and Telecommunications: a Policy Approach’, in Dyson and Humphreys, The Politics of the Communications Revolution, p. 149.

33 Humphreys, ‘The Political Economy of Telecommunications in France’, p. 9.

34 V. Schneider and R. Werle, ‘Regime or Corporate Actor? The European Community in Telecommunications Policy’, in Dyson and Humphreys, The Political Economy of Communications, pp. 77–107.

35 K. Dyson and P. Humphreys, ‘Conclusion’ in Dyson and Humphreys, The Political Economy of Communications, pp. 229–43, p. 236.

36 Shearman, ‘European Collaboration…’, op. cit.

37 Schneider and Werle, ‘Regime or Corporate Actor?’, op. cit.

38 The Economist, 28 October 1989, p. 113.

39 Dyson and Humphreys, ‘Politics, Markets and Communication Policies’, p. 11

40 Economist Telecommunications Survey, 10 March 1990, p. 16.

41 K. Morgan and D. Webber, ‘Divergent Paths: Political Strategies for Telecommunications in Britain, France and West Germany’, in Dyson and Humphreys, The Politics of the Communications Revolution, pp. 56–79.

42 V. Schneider, ‘Governance by Policy Networks: the German Telecommunications Sector’, Max‐Planck‐Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung, Cologne, 1989.

43 Grande, E., ‘Telecommunications policy in West Germany and Britain—a Comparative Analysis of Political Strategies for Telecommunications’, Political Studies Association Annual Conference, Aberdeen, 7–9 04, 1987 Google Scholar; P. Humphreys, ‘The State and Telecommunications Modernisation in Britain, France and West Germany’, Manchester Papers in Politics, Government Department, Manchester University, 6/88.

44 Wilks and Wright, ‘States, Sectors and Networks’, op. cit.

45 Humphreys, ‘The Political Economy of Telecommunications in France’, op. cit.

46 Webber, D., ‘The Assault on the “Fortress on the Rhine”. The Politics of Telecommunications Deregulation in the Federal Republic of Germany’, Paper for the Conference of the Council of European Studies, Washington, D.C., 30 10—1 11, 1987 Google Scholar.

47 Schneider, ‘Governance by Policy Networks’, p. 53.

48 Dyson and Humphreys, ‘Politics, Markets and Communication Policies’, pp. 24–30.

49 M. Komiya, ‘Intelsat and the Debate on the Introduction of Satellite Competition: an Economic Assessment’, in Dyson and Humphreys, The Political Economy of Communications, pp. 58–76, p. 65.

50 Kavanaugh, A., ‘Star WARCs and New Systems: an Analysis of US International Satellite Policy Formation’, Telecommunications Policy, 10, 2, 1986, pp. 93–105 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

51 J.‐L. Renaud, ‘The Role of the International Telecommunications Union: Conflict, Resolution and the Industrialised Countries’, in Dyson and Humphreys, The Political Economy of Communications, pp. 35–57.

52 Dyson and Humphreys, ‘Conclusion’ in Dyson and Humphreys, The Political Economy of Communications, pp. 240–1.

53 Brzezinski, Z., Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Technetronic Era, New York, Viking Press, 1970 Google Scholar; Goldman, M., Gorbachev’s Challenge. Economic Reform in the Age of Technology, New York, W. W. Norton, 1987 Google Scholar, Chs. 4 and 5.

54 D. Herspring, ‘Technology and the Soviet System’, Problem of Communism, January/February 1985, pp. 73–76, p. 74. Also see Parrot, B., Politics and Technology in the Soviet Union (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1983 Google Scholar); and, Hoffmann, E. and Laird, R., The Scientific-Technical Revolution and Soviet Foreign Policy (New York: Pergamon, 1982 Google Scholar)—both of which works Herspring’s article reviews.

55 Stonier, op. cit., ‘The Microelectronic Revolution, Soviet Political Structure, and the Future of East/West Relations’.

56 Dizard, W. and Swensrud, S., Gorbachev’s Information Revolution: Controlling Glasnost in a New Electronic Era (Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 1987), pp. 1–2 Google Scholar.

57 ibid., pp. 14–7.

58 Gill and Law, The Global Political Economy, op. cit., p. 375.