Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T03:25:34.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gender, Politics and Policy Change: The Case of Welfare Reform Under New Labour

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2013

Claire Annesley
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Politics and gender scholarship is increasingly seeking to understand the relationship between the presence of women in politics and gendered policy outcomes – the substantive representation of women (SRW). Yet its focus remains squarely on the activities of ‘critical actors’ in parliaments and women's policy agencies and on ‘feminist’ rather than ‘mainstream’ policy areas. In contrast, this article investigates the impact of feminist actors in a range of institutional settings on recent processes of welfare reform in the UK. It finds that the gendered welfare reform introduced by New Labour was initiated and pushed through by a coalition of committed feminist actors across a range of institutions. Crucially, the reforms relied on the existence of ‘strategic actors’ and ‘gate openers’, defined as feminist actors in positions of significant institutional power. It makes a contribution to the actor-centred SRW scholarship, develops an institutionalist approach to this research and identifies the need for a political economy perspective to understanding how women can shape policy outcomes.

Type
Articles
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 45 , Issue 1 , 2010 , pp. 50 - 72
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2010.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Chappell, L., Gendering Government, Vancouver, University of British Columbia Press, 2004 Google Scholar; Childs, S., New Labour's Women MPs: Women Representing Women, London, Routledge, 2004 Google Scholar; Lovenduski, J., Feminizing Politics, Cambridge, Polity Press, 2005 Google Scholar; Mazur, A., Theorising Feminist Policy, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Stetson, D. McBride and Mazur, A. (eds), Comparative State Feminism, London, Sage, 1995 Google Scholar; Waylen, G., Engendering Transitions, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Childs, S. and Krook, M. L., ‘Critical Mass Theory and Women's Political Representation’, Political Studies, 56: 3 (2008), pp. 725–37.Google Scholar

3 Childs and Krook, ‘Critical Mass Theory and Women's Political Representation’; Childs, S. and Krook, M. L., ‘Analysing Women's Substantive Representation: From Critical Mass to Critical Actors’, Government and Opposition, 44: 2 (2009), pp. 125–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 Childs, S., New Labour's Women MPs: Women Representing Women, London, Routledge, 2004 Google Scholar.

5 McBride Stetson and Mazur, Comparative State Feminism; J. Outshoorn and J. Kantola (eds), Changing State Feminism, Basingstoke, Palgrave, 2007.

6 McBride Stetson and Mazur, Comparative State Feminism, p. 1.

7 C. Durose and F. Gains, ‘Engendering the Machinery of Governance’, in C. Annesley, F. Gains and K. Rummery (eds), Women and New Labour, Bristol, Policy Press, 2007, pp. 93–116; C. Annesley and F. Gains, ‘The Core Executive: Gender, Power and Change’, Political Studies, forthcoming.

8 Annesley, C., ‘Women's Political Agency and Welfare Reform’, Parliamentary Affairs, 60: 4 (2007), pp. 452–66;CrossRefGoogle Scholar H. M. Hernes, Welfare State and Women Power, Oslo, Norwegian University Press, 1987.

9 Outshoorn and Kantola, Changing State Feminism; True, J., ‘Mainstreaming Gender in Global Public Policy’, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 5: 3 (2003), pp. 368–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10 Annesley, ‘Women's Political Agency and Welfare Reform’.

11 Mackay, F., ‘ “Thick” Conceptions of Substantive Representation’, Representation, 44: 2 (2008), pp. 125–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

12 Mazur, Theorising Feminist Policy.

13 Childs, S. and Withey, J., ‘The Substantive Representation of Women: The Case of the Reduction of VAT on Sanitary Products’, Parliamentary Affairs, 59: 1 (2005), pp. 10–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14 D. Stetson, (ed.), Abortion Politics, Women's Movements and the Democratic State: A Comparative Study of State Feminism, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2001; J. Outshoorn (ed.), The Politics of Prostitution, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2004; J. Lovenduski (ed.), State Feminism and Political Representation, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2005.

15 Annesley, Gains and Rummery, Women and New Labour.

16 Celis, K., Childs, S., Kantola, J. and Krook, M., ‘Rethinking Women's Substantive Representation’, Representation, 44: 2 (2008), pp. 99–110;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Mackay, ‘ “Thick” Conceptions of Substantive Representation’.

17 Celis et al., ‘Rethinking Women's Substantive Representation’.

18 Mackay, ‘ “Thick” Conceptions of Substantive Representation’.

19 Childs and Krook, ‘Critical Mass Theory and Women's Political Representation’.

20 Mackay, ‘ “Thick” Conceptions of Substantive Representation’.

21 The research was conducted for the ESRC project ‘Gendering Welfare Reform in Adult Worker Model Welfare States: The UK’ (reference RES-000-22-1615). The grant holder thanks the ministers, politicians, officials, special advisers and lobbyists who agreed to be interviewed.

22 The adult worker model welfare state is one in which all adults – male and female – are expected to take paid employment and be financially independent. See Lewis, J., ‘The Decline of the Male Breadwinner Model: Implications for Work and Care’, Social Politics, 8: 2 (2001), pp. 152–70;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Annesley, ‘Women's Political Agency and Welfare Reform’.

23 Lewis, ‘The Decline of the Male Breadwinner Model’.

24 Lewis, J., ‘Gender and the Development of Welfare Regimes’, Journal of European Social Policy, 3 (1992), pp. 159–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

25 Lewis, ‘The Decline of the Male Breadwinner Model’; Annesley, C., ‘Transforming Welfare and Gender Regimes: Evidence from the UK and Germany’, Comparative European Politics, 1: 2 (2003), pp. 129–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

26 Annesley, C., ‘Lisbon and Social Europe: Towards a European “Adult Worker Model” Welfare System’, Journal of European Social Policy, 17: 3 (2007), pp. 195–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

27 Lewis, ‘The Decline of the Male Breadwinner Model’.

28 J. Waldfogel, S. K. Danziger, S. Danziger and K. Seefeldt, Welfare Reform and Lone Mothers' Employment in the US, CASE paper 47, London, LSE, 2001.

29 The gap between women's median hourly pay and men's was 12.8 per cent in April 2008. www.statistics.gov.uk/cci/nugget.asp?id=167 (accessed 18 February 2009).

30 C. Hakim, Key Issues in Women's Work: Female Diversity and the Polarisation of Women's Employment, 2nd edn, London, Glasshouse Press, 2004.

31 D. Fuchs, ‘Mucho Chores for Macho Men with Spain's New Law’, Observer, 26 June 2005, www.guardian.co.uk/print/0,3858,5224574-110592,00.html (accessed 25 October 2005); C. Valiente, ‘Spanish Gender Equality Policy: At the Vanguard of Europe?’, paper presented at the Feminist Ethics, Feminist Politics and the States We're in Conference, University of Edinburgh, 11 February 2006.

32 H. Bergman and B. Hobson, ‘Compulsory Fatherhood: The Coding of Fatherhood in the Swedish Welfare State’, in B. Hobson (ed.), Making Men into Fathers. Men, Masculinities and the Social Politics of Fatherhood, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2002, pp. 92–124.

33 DTI, Work and Parents: Competitiveness and Choice: A Green Paper, Cm 5005, 2000.

34 Interview with special adviser, 2008.

35 DTI, Work and Families: Choice and Flexibility: A Consultation Document, London, Stationery Office, 2005.

36 www.berr.gov.uk/whatwedo/employment/workandfamilies/add-paternityleave/index.html (accessed 18 February 2009).

37 P. Wintour, ‘Mandelson Under Fire Over Costcutting Plan to Drop Flexible Working Reforms’, Guardian, 21 October 2008.

38 H. Carter, ‘Fathers Failing to Take up Paid Paternity Leave’, Guardian, 27 July 2004.

39 Interview with special adviser, 2007.

40 Ibid.

41 P. A. Sabatier and H. Jenkins-Smith (eds), Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach, Oxford, Westview Press, 1993.

42 Interview with political adviser, 2007; interview with minister, 2007.

43 Interview with minister, 2007.

44 J. Lovecy, ‘Framing Claims for Women’, in Annesley, Gains and Rummery, Women and New Labour, pp. 63–92; interview with former policy adviser, 2007.

45 Interview with former policy adviser, 2007.

46 Interview with minister, 2007.

47 Interview with political adviser, 2007.

48 Interview with minister, 2007.

49 Interview with policy adviser, 2008.

50 Interview with political adviser, 2008.

51 Since 2007 the Equality and Human Rights Commission.

52 Interview with policy adviser, 2008.

53 Interview with DTI official, 2008.

54 Interview with former policy adviser, 2008.

55 Interview with DTI official, 2007.

56 Interview with minister, 2007.

57 Interview with policy adviser, 2008.

58 Interview with political adviser, 2007; interview with policy adviser, 2008.

59 Interview with former DTI senior official, 2008.

60 Interviews, 2007.

61 Interview, 2007.

62 Interview with policy adviser, 2008.

63 Ibid.

64 Interview with head of voluntary group, 2007.

65 DTI, Work and Families: Choice and Flexibility, Government Responses to Public Consultation, London, Stationery Office, 2005, 1.14.

66 Interview with DTI official, 2007.

67 Interview with policy adviser, 2008.

68 Interviews, 2007 and 2008.

69 Interview, 2008.

70 Smith, M. J., The Core Executive in Britain, London,Macmillan, 1999 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

71 Annesley and Gains, ‘The Core Executive’.

72 Interview with former senior DTI official, 2008.

73 Interviews, 2007 and 2008.

74 Interview, 2007. Kitty Ussher was elected MP for Burnley in 2005 and appointed economic secretary to the Treasury in June 2007. Deborah Lincoln was the Labour Party women's officer during the period of opposition and now works in the private sector.

75 Interviews with feminist ministers, 2007.

76 Interview with former policy adviser, 2007; interview with feminist journalist, 2008.

77 Interview, 2007. Carey Oppenheim has a social policy background as an academic at South Bank University and later the IPPR. She is now co-director of the IPPR on a job-share basis with Lisa Harker.

78 Sally Morgan was director of campaigns and elections 1993–97 and head of party liaison for Blair as leader of the opposition 1995–97. She is now Baroness Morgan of Huyton in the House of Lords.

79 D. Aitkenhead, ‘Behind Closed Doors’, Guardian, 12 May 2005.

80 Interview with former special adviser, 2007.

81 Kenny, M., ‘Gender, Institutions and Power’, Politics, 27: 2 (2007), pp. 91–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar