Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T05:26:57.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gender Differences in Political Participation in Britain: Traditional, Radical and Revisionist Models*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2014

Pippa Norris
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

IN RECENT YEARS QUESTIONS ABOUT THE EXTENT AND nature of gender differences in political participation have proved controversial. Within the literature we can identify three main perspectives. The traditional view, common in the 1950s and 1960s, was that women tended to be less involved and interested in most conventional forms of political life, whether in terms of elected office, party membership, interest group activity, or campaign work, and, to a lesser extent, in voting. The paucity of women in parliamentary elites therefore seemed consistent with their general lack of interest in political life. Debates about the causes of the participation gap tended to revolve around the relative importance of gender differences in structural life-styles (domestic constraints, socio-economic resources, and organizational affiliations) and/or political attitudes (sex role socialization, political efficacy and confidence). The traditional perspective may have become less popular but it continues to receive support from some recent studies.

Type
Articles
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , 01 January 1991 , pp. 56 - 74
Copyright
Copyright © Government and Opposition Ltd 1991

References

1 Duverger, Maurice, La participation des femmes à la vie politique, UNESCO, Paris, 1955, pp. 13–74 Google Scholar; Almond, G. and Verba, S., The Civic Culture, Boston, Mass., 1965, pp. 324–5Google Scholar; Tingsten, H., Political Behaviour, London, 1937 Google Scholar.

2 Martin Lipset, Seymour, Political Man, London, Heinemann, 1971, pp. 182–4Google Scholar.

3 Rokkan, Stein, Citizens, Elections and Parties, Oslo, 1970 Google Scholar.

4 Milbrath, L., Political Participation, Chicago, Rand McNally, 1968, p. 18 Google Scholar; Lane, R. E., Political Life, Glencoe, Illinois, Free Press, 1959, pp. 204–34Google Scholar.

5 Blondel, Jean, Votes, Parties and Leaders, Harmondsworth, Pelican, 1970, pp. 55–56 Google Scholar.

6 Verba, Sidney, Nie, Norman and Kim, Jae, Participation and Political Equality, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1980, p. 234.Google Scholar

7 L. Milbrath, op. cit., p. 116.

8 Bourque, Susan and Grossholtz, , ‘Politics and unnatural practice: political science looks at female participation’ in Siltanen, Janet and Stanworth, Michelle, Women and the Public Sphere, London, Hutchinson, 1984, pp. 103–21Google Scholar; Murray Goot and Elizabeth Reid, ‘Women: if not apolitical, then conservative’ in Siltanen and Stanworh, ibid.; Jones, Kathleen, ‘Towards a revision of politics’ in Jones, Kathleen and Jonasdottir, Ann, The Political Interests of Gender, London, Sage, 1988, pp. 20–27 Google Scholar.

9 See Lovenduski, Joni, Women and European Politics, Brighton, Wheatsheaf, 1986, pp. 135–62Google Scholar; Weber, M., Odorisio, C. C. and Zincone, G., The Situation of Women in the Political Process in Europe, Part I, Strasbourg, Council of Europe, 1984, p.66 Google Scholar.

10 Skard, Torild and Haavio-Mannila, Elina, ‘Mobilisation of Women at Elections’ in Haavio-Mannila, Elina et al., Unfinished Democracy: Women in Nordic Politics, Oxford, Pergamon Press, 1985, pp. 43–48 Google Scholar.

11 Dalton, Russell, Citizen Politics in Western Democracies, New Jersey, Chatham House, 1988, pp. 52–73 Google Scholar.

12 Earl Bennett, Stephen, Apathy in America, 1960–64: Causes and Consequences of Citizen Political Indifference, Dobbs Ferry, N. Y., Transnational Publishers, 1986, pp. 72–75 Google Scholar.

13 Randall, Vicky, Women and Politics, 2nd ed., London, Macmillan, 1987, p. 57 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; see also reviews of the literature by Joni Lovenduski op. cit., pp.117–62; Weber, Odorisio and Zincone, op. cit., pp.26–52; Christy, C., Sex Differences in Political Participation: Processes of Change in Fourteen Nations, New York, Praeger, 1987 Google Scholar.

14 Hernes, Helga Maria, The Situation of Women in the Political Process in Europe, Part III, ‘The Role of Women in Voluntary Associations and Organisations’, Strasbourg, Council of Europe, 1984, pp. 21–31 Google Scholar; Joni Lovenduski, op. cit., pp.126–7.

15 Social Trends, London, CSO, HMSO, op. cit., 1989, pp.176–7.

16 Butler, David and Butler, Gareth, British Political Facts, 1900–1985, London, Macmillan, 1986 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; NEC Report, London, The Labour Party, 1989.

17 See Randall, op. cit., pp.58–64; Lovenduski, op. cit., London, pp.126–7; Weber, Odorisio and Zincone, op. cit., p.29.

18 Barnes, S. and Kaase, M., et al., Political Action. Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies, Beverly Hills, Sage, 1979, p. 184 Google Scholar.

19 Randall, op. cit., pp.60–63.

20 Pridham quoted in Randall, op. cit.

21 Weber, Odorisio and Zincone, op. cit, p.29.

22 Dalton, op. cit, pp.68–69.

23 Marsh, Alan, Protest and Political Consciousness, London, Sage, 1977, p. 70–71 Google Scholar

24 Jones, op. cit., pp.22–3.

25 Carroll, Berice, ‘Review Essay: Political Science, Part I: American Politics and Voting behaviour’, Signs, Vol. V, No. 2, 1979, p. 292 Google Scholar; see also Beckwith, Karen, American Women and Political Participation, Westport, Connecticut, Greenwood Press, 1986 Google Scholar.

26 Miller, Warren E. and Traugott, Santa A., American National Election Studies Data Sourcebook, 1952–1986, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, 1989 Google Scholar.

27 Stanley, Harold W. and Niemi, Richard G., Vital Statistcs on American Politics, Washington, DC, CQ Press, 1990 Google Scholar.

28 Skard and Haavio-Mannila, op. cit, p.40.

29 Verba, Nie and Kim, op. cit.

30 Craig, F. W. S., British Electoral Facts, 1832–1987, Dartmouth, Parliamentary Research Services, 1989, p. 89 Google Scholar.

31 For France and Germany, however, see Duverger, Maurice, La participation des femmes à la vie politique, Paris, UNESCO, 1955, pp. 14–20 Google Scholar

32 Baxter, Sandra and Lansing, Marjorie, Women and Politics: The Visible Majority, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, 1983, p. 150 Google Scholar.

33 Crewe, Ivor, Fox, Anthony and Alt, James, ‘Non-voting in British General Elections 1966-October 1974’ in Crouch, Colin (ed.), British Political Sociology Yearbook, Vol. 3, London, Croom Helm, 1977, pp. 52–4Google Scholar.

34 See Kevin Swaddle and Anthony Heath, ‘Official and reported turnout in the British General Election of 1987’, British Journal of Political Science, 1989.

35 The information on turn-out in the 1987 general election was derived independently of the 1987 British Election Study from records held in the Lord Chancellor’s office by Kevin Swaddle. Given the systematic bias towards over-reporting, voting participation was checked against actual, rather than reported turn-out

36 George Moyser and Geraint Parry, ‘A Map of Political Participation in Britain’, paper presented at the Conference of Political Participation, Manchester, 1990, p.22; George Moyser, Geraint Parry and Neil Day, ‘Political Participation in Britain: National and Local Patterns’, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington DC, 28–31 August 1986, p.28.

37 Crewe, Fox and Alt, op. cit., pp.52–4.

38 Hills, Jill, ‘Britain’, in Lovenduski, Joni and Hills, Jill, The Politics of the Second Electorate, London, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1981 Google Scholar.

39 Welch, Susan, ‘Sex Differences in Political Activity in Britain,’ Women and Politics, Vol. 1: 2, Summer 1980. pp. 29–46 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

40 Moyser, Parry and Day, op. cit., p.28.

41 Marsh, op. cit.

42 Crewe, Fox and Alt, op. cit.

43 Crewe, Fox and Alt, op. cit., pp.63–89