Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T05:10:14.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Economics and Politics in a Socialist Country: Gorbachev's New Concepts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2014

Klaus von Beyme
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

SINCE GORBACHEV'S COMING TO POWER THE RELATIONSHIP between economics and politics in the Soviet Union has been changing rapidly. But even from the outset one could see that there would be limits to change. The primacy of politics which characterizes the relationship between economics and politics under the conditions of socialism in power will be fully maintained in the future, too. All proposals for more decentralization meet with obstacles when they seem to call into question the leading role of the party. The party is only advised to observe a kind of ‘economic restraint’: it should stop mingling every aspect of public administration with the economy. The idea is to free the party from its responsibility for detail in order to allow it to concentrate more on its central political tasks. In this respect socialism has problems similar to those which Western governments face in the welfare state. After the end of the hegemony of social democracy it is, above all, the conservative parties in Western Europe who are ready to reduce the responsibility of the governments of the day for many economic and social tasks: this is why we find deregulation efforts, privatization of public enterprises and the transfer of political functions to non-state social organizations everywhere.

Type
Articles
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , 01 April 1988 , pp. 167 - 185
Copyright
Copyright © Government and Opposition Ltd 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Buchholz, A., ‘Perestrojka und Ideologie’, Berichte des Bundesinstituts für ostwissenschaftliche and internationale Studien, 20, 1987, p. 38.Google Scholar

2 Gorbachev, M. S., Politicheskiy doklad tsentral’nogo komiteta KPSS XXVll s”ezdy Kommunistiches-koy partii Sovetskogo Soyuza, Moscow, Politizdat, 1986, p. 41.Google Scholar

3 ibid., p. 48.

4 M. S. Gorbatschow, Die Rede, Reinbek, Rowohlt, 1987, p. 52f.

5 V. Z. Drobizhev (ed.), SotsiaVnaya potitika sovetskogo gosudarstva, Moscow, Mysl’, 1985.

6 Materialy XXVI s”ezda KPSS, Moscow, Politizdat, 1982, p. 52.

7 Raykevich, A. (ed.), Sotsial’naya politika, Moscow, Progress, 1977.Google Scholar

8 Bortomore, T. B., Elites and Society, London, Watt, 1959, Chapter VII.Google Scholar

9 M. N. Rutkevich, ‘Sotsialisticheskaya spravedlivost”, Sotsiohgicheskiye issledovaniya (henceforth quoted as SI), 1986, No. 3 (13–23), p. 15.

10 Materialy XXVII s”ezda Kommunisticheskoy partit Sovetskogo Soyuza, Moscow, Politizdat, 1987.

11 H.-H. Höhmann, ‘Die sowjetische Wirtschaft nach dem XXVII. Parteitag der KPdSU’, in H. G. Bütow (ed.) Länderbericht Sowjet Union, Bonn, Bundeszentrale fur politische Bildung, 1986, p. 387—92.

12 Aitov, N. A., Sotsial’noye razvitiye regionov, Moscow, Mysl’, 1985, p. 69.Google Scholar

13 Sherstvobytov, V. P. et al. (eds), Natsional’niye otnosheniya v SSSR na sovremennom étape, Moscow, Nauka, 1979, p. 69.Google Scholar

14 Kulichenko, M. I., Rastsvet i sblizheniye natsii v SSSR, Moscow, Mysl’, 1981, p. 208.Google Scholar

15 Sources: N. A. Aitov, Sotsial’noye razvitiye regionov, Moscow, Mysl’, 1985, p. 29 (col. 1); p. 34 (col. 2) p. 36 (col. 3); A. S. Rebaykin/T. V. Troshina, Regional’nye osobennosti jormirovaniya i ispol’zovaniya obshchestvennykh Jondov potrebleniya, Moscow, Nauka, 1985, p. 64 (col. 4—5); ibid., p. 38f. (col. 6), ibid., p. 41 (col. 7—8), Aitov, op. cit., p. 22 (col. 9–10); R. I. Kosolapov et al. (Red), Sotsial’naya polhika i natsional’nye otnosheniya, Moscow, Mysl’, 1982, p. 142.

l6 Gorbachev, op. cit., 1986, p. 58.

17 ibid., p. 61.

18 M. Ch. Titma, Vybor professii kak sotsial’naya problems, Moscow, Mysl’, 1975, pp. 141ff.

19 F. R. Fillipov, ‘Nauchno-tekhnicheskiy progress i sovershenstvovaniye sotsial’noy struktury sovetskogo obshchestva’, SI, 1982, No. 2 (16–21), p. 18.

20 L. V. Sokhan et al., ‘Normativno-tsennostnyy podkhod k issledovaniyu obraza zhizni’, SI, 1984, No. 2 (104–109), p. 107.

21 Shmelev, G. I., Lichnoye podsobnoye khozyaystvo: vozmozhnosti i perspektivy, Moscow, Politizdat, 1983, p. 60.Google Scholar

22 G. Meyer (ed.), 27. Parteitag der KPdSU, Düsseldorf, Brücken-verlag, 1986, p. 362.

23 Komarov, V. E. and Cheryavsky, U.J., Dokhody i potrebnosti naseleniya SSSR, Moscow, Nauka, 1973.Google Scholar

24 Ruban, M. E., ‘Einkommen und Lebensstand’, in: Bütow, op. cit., (100–106), p. 100.Google Scholar

25 V. Ch. Bigulov et al., ‘Material’noye blagosostoyanie i sotsial’noye blagopoluchiye: Opyt postroeniya indeksov i analiziz vzaymosvyazi’, SI, 1984, No. 4 (78—93), p. 93.

26 yzhkov, R in Meyer, op. cit. p. 362 cf. Ryabushkin, T. V. (ed.), Demograficheskaya politika sotsialisticheskogo obshehestva, Moscow, Nauka, 1986, p. 75.Google Scholar

27 Narodnoye khozyaystvo, Moscow, Finansy i statistika, 1985, p. 465.

28 Ryzhkov in Meyer, op. cit. p. 364.

29 P. Stiller, Sozialpolitik in der UdSSR Î950-Î980, Baden-Baden, Nomos, 1983, p. 216.

30 L. M. Obrutskiy, ‘Bor’ba s p’yanstvom i alkogolizmom’, SI, 1985, No. 3 (35–41), p. 40.

31 Belyy, A. K. et al. (eds.), Eâinstvo ekonomicheskoy t sotsial’noy politiki razvitogo søtsialisticheskogø obshchestva, Leningrad, Izdatel’stvo Leningradskogo universiteta, 1985, pp. 7fF.Google Scholar

32 Quoted in: Schönfelder, B.: ökonomisches Risiko und Versicherung in sozialistischen Volkswirtschaften, Berlin, Duncker & Humblot, 1986, p. 75.Google Scholar

33 Drobizhev, op. cit. 1985, p. 231.

34 Stiller, op. cit. 1983, p. 302.