Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T02:33:52.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Democratic Institutions Beyond the Nation State: Measuring Institutional Dissimilarity in Federal Countries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2013

Imke Harbers  and
Matthew C. Ingram
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The persistence of subnational undemocratic regimes in new democracies has recently revived interest in intra-national patterns of democratization. This article offers new data and a methodological contribution to this literature, emphasizing the measurement of institutional variation across territorial units and levels of government. Developing new measures of the unevenness of democratic institutions within individual countries, and illustrating these measures with an original data set on electoral rules in Mexico at the federal level and across 32 subnational units, we provide tools to enhance the study of democracy, particularly at the subnational level and in federal or decentralized systems. More specifically, we develop measures of institutional characteristics across a country's spatial units and of federal-to-state institutional dissimilarity – what we call system-wide institutional incongruence.

Type
Articles
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 49 , Issue 1 , January 2014 , pp. 24 - 46
Copyright
Copyright © Government and Opposition Ltd 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Imke Harbers is Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Amsterdam and a Research Fellow at the Centre for Latin American Research and Documentation. Contact email: [email protected]. Matthew C. Ingram is Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University at Albany, State University of New York. Contact email: [email protected]. Both authors contributed equally to this work.

References

Beer, C.C. (2003), Electoral Competition and Institutional Change in Mexico (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press).Google Scholar
Beer, C.C. (2006), ‘Judicial Performance and the Rule of Law in the Mexican States’, Latin American Politics and Society, 48(3): 33–36.Google Scholar
Beer, C.C.Mitchell, N. (2004), ‘Democracy and Human Rights in the Mexican States: Elections or Social Capital?’, International Studies Quarterly, 48: 293–312.Google Scholar
Behrend, J. (2011), ‘The Unevenness of Democracy at the Subnational Level: Provincial Closed Games in Argentina’, Latin American Research Review, 46(1): 150–176.Google Scholar
Birnir, J.K. (2004), ‘Stabilizing Party Systems and Excluding Segments of Society? The Effects of Formation Costs on New Party Foundation in Latin America’, Studies in Comparative International Development, 39(3): 3–27.Google Scholar
Birnir, J.K. (2005), ‘Public Venture Capital and Party Institutionalization’, Comparative Political Studies, 38(8): 915–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bland, G. (2011), ‘Considering Local Democratic Transition in Latin America’, Journal of Politics in Latin America, 3(1): 65–98.Google Scholar
Borges, A. (2011), ‘The Political Consequences of Center-Led Redistribution in Brazilian Federalism: The Fall of Subnational Party Machines’, Latin American Research Review, 46(3): 21–45.Google Scholar
Calvo, E.Micozzi, J.P. (2005), ‘The Governor's Backyard: A Seat–Vote Model of Electoral Reform for Subnational Multiparty Races’, Journal of Politics, 67(4): 1050–1074.Google Scholar
Chandler, W.M.Chandler, M.A. (1987), ‘Federalism and Political Parties’, European Journal of Political Economy, 3(1–2): 87–109.Google Scholar
Cornelius, W. (1999), ‘Subnational Politics and Democratization: Tensions between Center and Periphery in the Mexican Political System’, in W. Cornelius, T. Eisenstadt and J. Hindley (eds), Subnational Politics and Democratization in Mexico (La Jolla: Center for US–Mexican Studies, University of California): 3–16.Google Scholar
Crespo, J.A. (2004), ‘Party Competition in Mexico: Evolution and Prospects’, in K.J. Middlebrook (ed.), Dilemmas of Political Change in Mexico (London: Institute of Latin American Studies): 57–81.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, T.A. (2004), Courting Democracy in Mexico: Party Strategies and Electoral Institutions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Geddes, B. (1999), ‘What do we Know about Democratization after Twenty Years?’, Annual Review of Political Science, 2(1): 115–144.Google Scholar
Gibson, E. (2005), ‘Boundary Control: Subnational Authoritarianism in Democratic Countries’, World Politics, 58(1): 101–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, E. (2010), ‘Politics of the Periphery: An Introduction to Subnational Authoritarianism and Democratization in Latin America’, Journal of Politics in Latin America, 2: 3–12.Google Scholar
Gibson, E.Suarez-Cao, J. (2010), ‘Federalized Party Systems and Subnational Party Competition: Theory and an Empirical Application to Argentina’, Comparative Politics, 43(1): 21–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giraudy, A. (2010), ‘The Politics of Subnational Undemocratic Regime Reproduction in Argentina and Mexico’, Journal of Politics in Latin America, 2(2): 53–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giraudy, A. (2012), ‘Subnational Democracy: Lessons from Latin America’, APSA-CD, Comparative Democratization, 10(1), January.Google Scholar
Hagopian, F. (1996), Traditional Politics and Regime Change in Brazil (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Hauss, C.Rayside, D. (1978), ‘The Development of New Parties in Western Democracies since 1945’, in L. Maisel and J. Cooper (eds), Political Parties: Development and Decay (Beverly Hills: Sage): 31–58.Google Scholar
Holzner, C. (2010), Poverty of Democracy: The Institutional Roots of Political Participation in Mexico (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press).Google Scholar
Hooghe, L.Marks, G. (2003), ‘Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-level Governance’, American Political Science Review, 97(2): 233–243.Google Scholar
Hug, S. (2001), Altering Party Systems: Strategic Behavior and the Emergence of New Political Parties in Western Democracies (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).Google Scholar
Ingram, M.C. (2012a), ‘Crafting Courts in New Democracies: Ideology and Judicial Council Reforms in Three Mexican States’, Comparative Politics, 44(4): 439–458.Google Scholar
Ingram, M.C. (2012b), ‘Elections, Ideology, or Opposition? Assessing Competing Explanations of Judicial Spending in Mexico’, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, published early online 31 January.Google Scholar
Katz, R.S.Mair, P. (1995), ‘Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy: The Emergence of the Cartel Party’, Party Politics, 1(1): 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key, V.O. (1949), Southern Politics in State and Nation (New York: Alfred A. Knopf).Google Scholar
Lijphart, A. (1975), ‘The Comparable-Cases Strategy in Comparative Research’, Comparative Political Studies, 8(2): 158–177.Google Scholar
Lujambio, A. (2001), ‘Democratization through Federalism? The National Action Party Strategy, 1939–2000’, in K. Middlebrook (ed.), Party Politics and the Struggle for Democracy in Mexico (La Jolla: Center for US-Mexican Studies): 47–94.Google Scholar
McMann, K.M. (2006), Economic Autonomy and Democracy: Hybrid Regimes in Russia and Kyrgyztan (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Mainwaring, S., Gervasoni, C.España-Nájera, A. (2010), The Vote Share of New and Young Parties, Kellogg Institute Working Paper 368.Google Scholar
Miragliotta, N. (2012), ‘From Local to National: Explaining the Formation of the Australian Green Party’, Party Politics, 18(3): 409–425.Google Scholar
Moncada, E.Snyder, R. (2012), ‘Subnational Comparative Research on Democracy: Taking Stock and Looking Forward’, APSA-CD, Comparative Democratization, 10(1), January.Google Scholar
Monsiváis Carrillo, A. (2009), 'La equidad electoral formal en los estados: México (1996–2007)’, Perfiles Latinoamericanos, 17(33): 7–37.Google Scholar
Montero, A.P.Samuels, D.J. (2004) (eds), Decentralization and Democracy in Latin America (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press).Google Scholar
O'Donnell, G. (1993), ‘The Browning of Latin America’, New Perspectives Quarterly, 10(4): 50–53.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, G. (1994), ‘Delegative Democracy’, Journal of Democracy, 5(1): 55–69.Google Scholar
Rae, D.W. (1971), The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Rosenstone, S.J., Behr, R.L.Lazarus, E.H. (1984), Third Parties in America: Citizen Response to Major Party Failure (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Sartori, G. (1970), ‘Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics’, American Political Science Review, 64(4): 1033–1053.Google Scholar
Sartori, G. (2005), Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis (Colchester: ECPR Press) (first published 1976).Google Scholar
Snyder, R. (2001), ‘Scaling Down: The Subnational Comparative Method’, Studies in Comparative and International Development, 36(1): 93–110.Google Scholar
Spirova, M. (2007), Political Parties in Post-Communist Societies: Formation, Persistence, and Change (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stefuriuc, I. (2007), ‘Governing Coalitions in Multi-level Settings: State-wide Parties and the Sub-National Arena in Spain’, in K. Deschouwer and M.T. Jans (eds), Politics Beyond the State (Brussels: Brussels University Press): 45–70.Google Scholar
Tavits, M. (2008), ‘Party Systems in the Making: The Emergence and Success of New Parties in New Democracies’, British Journal of Political Science, 38(1): 113–133.Google Scholar
Véliz, C. (1980), The Centralist Tradition of Latin America (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Willey, J. (1998), ‘Institutional Arrangements and the Success of New Parties in Old Democracies’, Political Studies, 46(3): 651–668.Google Scholar
Wuhs, S.T. (2008), Savage Democracy: Institutional Change and Party Development in Mexico (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press).Google Scholar